analysis that are conjoint

Conjoint analysis is a mathematical technique used in industry for market research. The technique is used in marketing research to assess the customer's interests and desires so that the firm can best represent him or her. Thus, the tool is used to determine how various clients or consumers of the company value such items, as well as the various factors or characteristics that cause them to choose the products over alternatives. Among the various types of conjoint analysis are card sorts, decision modeling, differential choice, preference-based conjoint, tradeoff matrices, and hierarchical modeling. The technique is used for a combination of goods and services given to the selected participants. The main role of the technique is to determine the reasons why the partakers decided to choose specific types of the products and not others. The valuation that is carried out using this method can be employed to come up with market models which can approximate the costs, profits, revenue and market share of an organization. Data is collected by the use of surveys or in the conjoint analysis.

Several steps are involved in the conveyance of the conjoint analysis. First, the organization should determine the essential services or products in the current market. The second step is to decide on the data collection methodology which will be employed, as well as the methods of recording data. The third step involves the determination of the conjoint techniques that will be used. The type of conjoint technique mostly used is the choice-based conjoint (CBC). After identifying the method, an experimental design is formulated. The strategy aids in determining the significant interactions between the various attributes of the products under question (Natter and Feurstein, 2002, p.450). The real data is collected, and then the utilities are calculated for all the participants in the study. Finally, once the information is obtained, the market simulation model is formulated, and it helps in predicting changes that might occur in future regarding the current product and the new products that might be brought to the consumer. The conjoint analysis technique is an excellent way of ensuring the commodities that an organization comes up with are pleasing to the customers and satisfy their needs.

Advantages of Conjoint Analysis

One of the benefits of conjoint analysis is that it can be applied in market segmentation. The technique is among the most effective ways of examining the tastes and preferences of the clients. Therefore, it is an actual measure of the perceptions the consumers have towards the products of an organization or an enterprise. Market segmentation seems to be in the middle of the technique in term of applicability. Thus, an organization understands how valuable its products are too specific customers, and then it becomes easy to create marketing programs that can be used to determine the benefits of the products to the consumer (Sharma and Malhotra 2015, p.29). An organization is also able to remodel an existing service or product by making use of the benefits obtained. With the remodelling, the new product or service fits the needs of the consumers and they stick to the company. Through innovativeness after carrying out conjoint analysis, the General Motors Company has been able to come up with different automotive designs which are unique for each of near 200 countries where they have buyers (Aribarg 2017, p.280).Consumers in the countries where GM undertakes its operations have varied preferences. (Aribarg 2017, p.280). With this knowledge, GM has been able to attain position nine in the world’s largest publicly traded companies (Aribarg 2017, p.280).

When a consumer understands the analysis of a certain company, they can make sound decisions on which products to purchase and why. Clients are given different alternatives to choose from (Dillon et al. 1987, p.66). Thus, the people who are used as the respondents can mimic the real-life behaviour of consumers to provide the organization with a rough idea of what the customers are likely to prefer and acts as a guide to the processes in the company (Netzer 2008, p.337). When the results are close to the real-life actions of the buyers, then the analysis is considered to be more accurate than when there is a great disparity between the two.

Thirdly, the technique helps in evaluating price sensitivity. It is possible to measure the relationship between price and other attributes of the commodity or service that a certain organization provides to its customers (Donche et al. 2015, p.146). In the information on the interaction or relationship between the participants and real-life buyers, it is easy to evaluate the sensitivity of the price which changes depending on the brand of a commodity (Annunziata and Vecchio 2013, p.350). Hence, an organization or an individual can run simulations at different levels of costs to determine the changes in their undertakings or those of the competitors. Application of the technique at General Electrics has enabled the company to analyse the price sensitivity of their customers as an external factor. Thus, the corporation has been able to maintain a low sensitivity which lowers the bargaining power of the customers, enhancing the customer loyalty.

Another benefit is brand equity where, through the appliance of the technique, it is possible to measure the value of a brand name. By using conjoint analysis, the corporation acquires information relating to the strength of the brand or the popularity of the commodity when compared with prices of the product and other features (Hainmueller et al. 2014, p.20). Basing on archer’s technique, it takes years of the survey to come up with the popularity that a product will have to the consumers to attain maximum profits. The analysis provides information on the advantages of a brand when compared to the characteristics of the products and their prices. At In Vitro Diagnostic Industry (IVD) for example, before a product is released into the market, the product has to under multiple tests to a certain for its effectiveness on patients.

Conjoint analysis aids in the decision-making process especially the purchase decisions. The respondents in the analysis can make any decision regarding the commodity preference (Mitchell 2002, p.104). There is an option of selecting none of the commodities or a service, meaning the customer has decided not to make purchases of the product. Thus, with all the different kinds of purchase decisions available, the customer preference can be obtained with accuracy as the model is almost a reality (Churchill and Iacobucci 2006, p.59). A firm can influence a consumer to buy a product or decline a sales offer depending on the drivers that motivate the consumers to purchase the product or its substitute good. Hence, in the long run, conjoint analysis can help an organization to make more money because the company knows what the customer wants regarding taste and preference thus making more sales (Gaul et al. 2010, p.15).

Drawbacks

One of the principal disadvantages is its complexity. Designing the method is a complicated affair that requires careful planning and massive use of funds. The questions asked in the formulation of the technique have to be accurate to avoid getting unreliable data and information (Meissner and Decker, 2010, p.64). Thus, the process needs expertise for it to succeed, and the right amount of resources should also be pumped.

Secondly, there are many issues associated with the technique when it comes to intangible attributes. There are some commodities that whose attributes or image are invisible. Most of the goods or services that fall into this category are luxury commodities (Sekaran et al., 2016, p.76). Luxury commodities are made of emotional factors rather than the objective factors, and this makes it difficult to make use of the method when luxury goods are involved.

Thirdly, the method comprises excess characteristics. In real life products, the number of features involved is high. When the attributes to be considered are more than 10, it becomes hard to derive the product description. As a result, the respondents are exhausted when they are giving their responses, resulting in the collection of unreliable data that cannot be used in real-life (Wittink and Bergestuen, 2001, p.145). An example of a company that can face this problem is HP. There are so many features on a laptop that a consumer can consider before buying a laptop from a certain company. These features include the size of the hard disc, size of the screen, processing speed, weight of the laptop, RAM, number of USB ports, operating system, among many others. Therefore, the respondents may be tired of responding to each of these attributes. Additionally, the respondents end up simplifying the strategies (Low et al. 2013, p.54) leading to invalid responses.

Fifthly, the technique works with the assumption that the respondent will have to choose one of the products from the vast variety that is offered. It only considers a consumer who has many products to choose. The technique does not take care of the consumers who have no selection of any of the organization’s products or services or those who have no interest in one or two of the company’s products. (Green et al. 2001, S60). It is possible to formulate adjustment to the technique so that the limitation of a large number of attributes can be solved, but still, it is not possible to exhaust all the weaknesses through the formulation of hybrid models (Kim et al. 2016, p.60). The technique does not also include the number of products that are purchased at once. Meaning that it can end up giving an inaccurate view of the market share of a particular organization or product.

Trends in using Conjoint Analysis

In the traditional practices, the research data to be analyzed was collected using pencils and questionnaires, or sometimes through the use of telephone calls or one-on-one communication. However, from the early 1990s to date, the web is used to gather most of the data that is required. This improvement has led to the collection of more information per question in the respondents (Parniangtong 2017, p.90). The new adaptive methods have facilitated the collection of more information. Some of the adaptive techniques include available adaptive conjoint analysis. However, the increase in the accessibility and data collected from the respondents has also come with its disadvantages. One of the drawbacks is the lower levels of patience and attentiveness in the respondents (Vidal et al. 2013, p.68). Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that the respondents maintain their focus on the task at hand. One of the modifications that have been made to ensure the respondents keep their focus is the user design approach (Nikou, Bouwman, and de Reuver 2014, p.82). In this case, the respondent is permitted to design his perfect product on a virtual basis. With the information on the ideal virtual products, the organization can move forward in developing new products or re-designing the existing products to meet the requirements of the customers.

A major issue that the analysis has been associated with since its inception is the analysis of products or services with multiple features (Smith, 2008). In the future modifications that have been proposed to counter this problem, the traditional self-explicated approach is highly applicable. The limitations brought by this issue have been solved by the hybrid estimation method (Wilson et al. 2015, p.44). The hybrid method combines the preference data with the self-explicated data derived from the partial profiles.

Suggestions have been placed on how to deal with the large-product dimensionality by coming up with ingenious methods of data collection. Through such innovative plans, it will be possible to solve even more complex problems in future with a higher degree of accuracy (McQuarrie 2015, p.88). Consequently, the new methods used are combing several types of data. The new auxiliary data is used to supplement the traditional preference data to increase the chances of accuracy in the techniques (Swaim 2011, p.100).

Challenges and Issues in Conjoint Analysis

One challenge that comes up in the use of the technique under discussion is the propensity of the respondents to concentrate on the price of the commodity rather than evaluate all the other attributes before looking at the price (Kucukusta and Guillet 2014, p.122). The respondents do not have a clue of the attributes chosen in the study, meaning that the company wasted time. Hence, it becomes difficult to determine the price sensitivity. One clever technique of addressing this issue is by putting a price range rather than a single price (Natter and Feurstein, 2002, p.450). By including a price range, the respondent will have to evaluate the attributes first before considering the price.

Conclusion

Conclusively, conjoint analysis is a helpful tool in evaluating the consumer perception of a particular product or service offered by an organization. The primary purpose of the analysis technique is to determine the best combination of characteristics according to the tastes and preferences of the respondents, who represents the consumer or customer of the commodity. The most preferred combination of attributes is selected as the product to be produced. The professor Paul Green developed the technique, and currently, it is used for different applications in the field of applied sciences and social sciences in sectors such as marketing, operations research, and management of products. Some of the advantages of the technique include its ability to make use of physical objects, its evaluation of the preferences at the level of the single consumer, and its ability to determine the trade-offs the consumers make when faced with several options. On the other hand, it also has drawbacks like the difficulty involved in drawing up the analysis, over-fixation on the price of the commodity rather than the attributes. The technique also lacks applicability in luxuries and other emotional goods and its lack of consideration of consumers who are willing to buy more than one type of the commodity under evaluation. The conjoint analysis technique is an excellent technique for ensuring the products that an organization comes up with is pleasing to the customers.



References

Annunziata, A. and Vecchio, R., 2013. Consumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probiotics. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), pp.348-355.

Aribarg, A., Burson, K.A. and Larrick, R.P., 2017. Tipping the Scale: The Role ofDiscriminability in Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(2), pp.279-292.

Churchill, G.A. and Iacobucci, D., 2006. Marketing research: methodological foundations. New York: Dryden Press.

Dillon, William R, Thomas J. Madden, and Neil H. Firtle. Marketing Research in a Marketing Environment. St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby College Pub, 1987. Print.

Donche, Vincent, Sven. Meyer, David Gijbels, and Huub. Bergh., 2015. Methodological Challengesin Research on Student Learning.

Gaul, Wolfgang A. (2015). Challenges at the Interface of Data Analysis, Computer Science, andOptimization: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft FürKlassifikation E. V., Karlsruhe, July 21-23, 2010. Berlin: Springer.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M., and Wind, Y., 2001. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31(3), pp.S56-S73.

Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D., and Yamamoto, T., 2014. Cjoint: Causal Inference in ConjointAnalysis: Understanding Multi-Dimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.Package Version.

Kim, D.S., Bailey, R.A., Hardt, N. and Allenby, G.M., 2016. Benefit-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Science, 36(1), pp.54-69.

Kucukusta, D. and Guillet, B.D., 2014. Measuring spa-goers' preferences: A conjoint analysis approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, pp.115-124.

Low, P., and Deborah K. Elms. Global Value Chains in a Changing World. Geneva: WorldTrade Organization, 2013.

McQuarrie, E.F., 2015. The market research toolbox: a concise guide for beginners. Sage Publications.

Meissner, M. and Decker, R., 2010. Eye-tracking information processing in the choice-based conjoint analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 52(5), pp. 58-70.

Mitchell, R.K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P.P., Morse, E.A. and Smith, J.B., 2002.Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side ofentrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 27(2), pp.93-104.

Natter, M. and Feuerstein, M., 2002. Real world performance of choice-based conjoint models.European Journal of Operational Research, 137(2), pp.448-458.

Netzer, O., Toubia, O., Bradlow, E.T., Dahan, E., Evgeniou, T., Feinberg, F.M., Feit, E.M., Hui,S.K., Johnson, J., Liechty, J.C. and Orlin, J.B., 2008. Beyond conjoint analysis: Advancesin preference measurement. Marketing Letters, 19(3-4), p.337.

Nikou, S., Bouwman, H. and de Reuver, M., 2014. A Consumer Perspective on Mobile Service Platforms: A Conjoint Analysis Approach. CAIS, 34, p.82.

Parniangtong, S., 2017. Competitive Advantage of Customer Centricity. Springer.

Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R., 2016. Research methods for business: A skill building approach.John Wiley & Sons.

Sharma, S. and Malhotra, N.K., 2015. Examining Social Setting and Product Reference via Conjoint Analysis An Empirical Study of Restaurant Patronage. Springer, Cham.

Smith, Tim J. Pricing Strategy: Setting Price Levels, Managing Price Discounts, & EstablishingPrice Structures, 2012.

Swaim, Robert W. The Strategic Drucker: Growth Strategies and Marketing Insights from the Works of Peter Drucker. Chichester: Wiley, 2011.

Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Sapolinski, A., Giménez, A., Maiche, A., and Ares, G., 2013. Can eye-tracking techniques overcome a limitation of conjoint analysis? A case study on healthfulness perception of yoghurt labels. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28(5), pp.370-380.

Wilson, L.S., Loucks, A., Gipson, G., Zhong, L., Bui, C., Miller, E., Owen, M., Pelletier, D., Goodin, D., Waubant, E. and McCulloch, C.E., 2015. Patient preferences for attributes of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: development and results of ratings- based conjoint analysis. International Journal of MS care, 17(2), pp.74-82.

Wittink, D.R. and Bergestuen, T., 2001. Forecasting with conjoint analysis. In Principles offorecasting. Springer US.