The rates of obesity have increased significantly in the recent past due to factors such as the sudden change of lifestyle and poor feeding habits(James et al, 2001 p,9). People rarely engage in physical exercises despite the poor diet. According to a recent report, people’s body mass index, which determines whether a person is obese, has been reported as being higher than the recommended thus implying the prevalence of obesity is on the rise. Obesity has similarly become undesirable in the society as obese people continue to experience discrimination in the social set up. It has therefore proved difficult for the obese people to fit in as they are not acceptable in various places such as learning institutions, and workplaces among others. This paper aims to identify the causes of weight bias in the workplaces, the perceptions of the society regarding obesity as well as the measures that should be put in place to reduce stigmatization resulting from obesity in workplaces and the community.
Weight Influence in Hiring
Introduction
Weight discrimination has significantly increased up to more than 66% from early 1990’s to the mid-2000. This is according to a research conducted by the Yale University’s Rudd Centre for Food Policy and Obesity. If further reported that more than two-thirds of Americans are currently obese or overweight and that the discrimination based on weight has overpowered discriminationbased on factors such as disability, sexual orientation and ethnicity among others. Notably, there is no federal guidance and litigation to protect the overweight-related discrimination in workplaces despite the existence of such evidence. It is this kind of discrimination that affects the psyches and souls of obese people barring them from trying new things and performing better in the workplaces( Bacon). It also leads to stigmatization in the workplaces with fat people experiencing isolation, ridicule and negative perceptions such as greed.
Methodology
Data was collected using the Google Scholar database using weight, bias, weight bias, stigma, stigmatization, discrimination, stereotypes, workplace, work setting, and employment as the keywords.
Bias in Workplaces
Overweight and obesity often attract some undesirable social consequences. People with obesity usually face stigma and bias in the society often being victims of negative attitudes in most social places. Stigma and prejudice may occur in different forms that affect the interpersonal interactions such as stereotypes, ridicule, name-calling and physical stigma among others(Fikka"Rothblum, 2005 p. 55). Some overweight people have expressed concerns especially after job interviews whereby a previously successful candidate has declined a job opportunity upon meeting their prospective employees. Many of these attribute their appearances as the primary causes of such denial of opportunities and discrimination, which according to studies has been prevailing in the past and recent years. A meta-analysis by Mark Roehlingindicates that weight-based discrimination customarily impacts all areas of employment from hiring, firing, career counseling, discipline, pay allocation, and promotion among others. This bias is most evident during hiring when the employer is less informed about an employee thus he/she is influenced by stereotypes regarding overweight people such as being lazy, non-performers, anti-social among others(Cort Rudolph, 2001, p. 25)
The rise in discrimination rates among people with obesity has been on the rise mainly on women. In the course of employment, sixty-five percent of women reported cases of discrimination as compared to the thirty-five percent of men(Fikka"Rothblum, 2005 p. 65).. It is thus in order to deduce that discrimination based on weight affects women disproportionately. The majority of obese people in the population are women thus, have to endure more discriminatory practices and remarks more than their male counterparts.
There has been a perception of weight about gender with some studies attributing that women tend to be less physically active than men and that after childbirth, many women find it difficult to lose weight. In addition, women face cruel judgment from the society due to failing to meet the ideal standards of physical attractiveness, which is expected to be higher than that of men (John Cawley, 2004). He also indicated a correlation between obesity and remuneration in that, if a woman gains more than 60 pounds, her wages are likely to lower by 9 percent or more. Another research revealed that obesity could lower the earnings of a woman by 6.2% annually compared to 2.3% of a man (Charles Baum).
Most of these women that face discrimination usually find it difficult to differentiate the reasons behind it, whether it is due to gender or weight-based, or even both. It is possible that women may be discriminated based on those factors, but there are others that equally lead to such discrimination such as disability, sexual orientation, race, and the nation of origin among others. Race in most cases has been found to relate to the weight-based discrimination primarily due to the genetic and cultural differences. For instance, the Mexican-American and the Africans- Americans women have been observed and identified as to have higher rates of obesity compared to the white women.
In the United States, a new report by the conference board, the employers especially in the private sector are seemingly concerned about obesity in the workplaces due to the cost associated with it. It further spells that most of these companies spend approximately 45 billion dollars annually in work losses and expenditure used in medical insurance. In addition to that, spending, it shows that in more than a decade, the obese worker had filed compensations claims more than the no-obese people, they had more medical costs and had lost many working days due to work injuries or other illnesses. Besides, according to these report, a sampled 100 employees medical claims added up to approximately 51,000 dollars for the obese as compared to 7500 dollars for the non-obese on the average.
In addition, in Britain, some employers were interviewed on their attitudes towards obese workers, and most of them responded negatively regarding employing a fast worker. They perceived the obese workers as less productive terming them lazy and unable to perform the duties allocated to them as well as being unfit for a business environment ( Crossland Employment Solicitors)
Causes of Weight Bias In Employment
The workplaces have been identified as a hotbed for overweight and obese discrimination by many studies and research. There is evidence of insensitivity, inequity, and prejudice to the affected persons. Further studies indicate that employers often have stereotypic attitudes regarding the obese people thus they are generally at a disadvantage even before an interview is conducted. In an experimental study aimed at examining the perception of the employees on the obese people using written description and photographs, people who were described as having an average weight were considered more suitable to make better managers and supervisors while the overweight and obese received criticism and cruel judgments (Klassen et al, 2012). The study was followed by another one where ten fictitious women were selected with descriptions that varied in weight, stereotypical and associated with obesity and being thin. The participants in the study indicated that they were more willing to work with the thin people while the least participants opted for the obese people. In yet another study where there was an opening for a sales and business opportunities, the applicants were required to submit written descriptions whereby the results showed a significant number of obese women receiving cruel judgment as opposed to the non-obese women. In addition to the harsh judgment, the obese women were rated as people who lack self-discipline, have poor personal hygiene, poor professional appearance and a lower supervisor skills. It was the same for the positions of the front office who were considered as having lean bodies and professional appearances as compared to the obese people.
It is overly evident that the obese population is vulnerable to the negative evaluations and ultimately faces discrimination in their places of work whenever they succeed in getting any form of employment primarily because of their weight. It is also evident that the several institutions as well as the society, base their negative evaluation and judgment to the obese people on unfounded and unfair stereotypes which should not be the case. They should be employed based on their qualifications, competencies, and ability to perform a specific task. They should also receive equal treatment with the others especially while promoting, demoting or firing. Obesity should never be used as the tool to determine such actions in the workplaces.
Additionally, these stereotypes ought to change to create an inclusive society for all. The fear and prejudice held by people regarding obesity have contributed to vices in the community such as the discrimination as well as hindering the relevant authorities from implementing the strategies concerned with the fight against obesity. Weight discrimination has led to some consequences among them being the inability to survive social relationships as obese people experience bias in many social setups.
For instance, in public eateries, an obese person might be condemned for eating like the regular people as he/she may be seen as contributing to his eating style thus might be a victim of harsh judgment. Sadly, many people are misinformed thus attribute obesity and overweight conditions to gluttony disregarding other factors such as genetics, and medications among others. Other consequences include the lack of opportunities in social settings like schools and employment firms and the degradation of their health as they continually face discrimination in the healthcare institutions.
Weight discrimination I the employment sector has had a massive impact on the obese employees regarding their wages, promotions and the termination of contracts of work. The employers and colleagues normally assume that the overweight people usually lack the self-discipline, emotionally unstable, disagreeable, sloppy, incompetent and lazy. They are also believed to be slow thinkers, make poor role models as well as holding poor records of attendance. As a result of these stereotypes their wages, termination, and promotion are significantly affected.
According to a study that was involved adults of 18 years and above revealed that the penalty wage for obese employees was significant in ways such as lower wages for the same duties executed by non-obese workers, less obese employees were promoted, and they were less likely to be hired in high positions. Obese men and women face obstacles related to wages even though it happens in different forms. In an analysis by the National Longitudinal Survey Youth Cohort revealed that in a sampled population of more than 8000 people, 12% of obese women earned less than their non-obese counterparts suggesting that the economic penalty is primarily aimed to affect the women. In addition, it was reported that more women that are obese were most likely to hold low-paying jobs that the thin women, while it also suggested that overweight women 6000 dollars less than the non-obese women do (Gortmaker et al, 2012). Social bias and discrimination have been identified as the leading causes of the lower wages among the obese women (Stunkard" Sorensen, 2000)
On the other hand, men with obesity have been reported not to receive such a wage penalty as women but face discrimination in other ways. They are often paid less than the non- obese men and are overly underrepresented in professional, supervisory and managerial positions. They are over-represented in sectors such as transportation. Therefore, as opposed to obese women who in most cases get a pay cut, the obese men are bound to occupational sorting which is also discriminatory.
Moreover, an experimental study conducted showed that the obese employees had been rated to have lower chances of being promoted in the workplaces compared to their male counterparts. According to that study, a team of managerial and supervisory staff was to evaluate the potential of a promotion to hypothetical employees one who was disabled and the other one was obese. The obese employee was rated with lower promotion recommendations as opposed to the disabled employee.
In addition, even though there is not much research that shows the benefits obese employees receive. However, as the self-conducted study revealed that people with obesity had been denied health insurance benefits due to their weight while others were sent on compulsory leave because of the same. These workers often perceive that they have been sent on these eaves or suspended due to their obesity ( Rothblum et al, 2001)
Perceptions of Obesity by the Society
Various perceptions exist in the society regarding people with obesity. According to several studies, there is evidence that most of the Americans especially in the north have negative perceptions of people with obesity, and sadly, it is usually acceptable and encouraged.
Other than the negative stereotypes, various channels such as the media shape the opinion of the people regarding obesity. In most of these media industries, rarely do we see obese people working for them in news castings among other roles that are viewed by the public(Cogan et al, 1996, p105). Such people work in departments that are rarely accessed by the public and in some instances use the images of the obese people as examples of poor health and living style. Owing to their wide range of reaching the audience, they should develop messages that promote healthy living among people and help in reducing the weight bias in the places of work(Cogan et al, 1996, p107).
Interventions to Reduce Obesity Stigmatization
Notably, despite the vast evidence of the discrimination of obese people in the society, there are no established laws that prohibit this discrimination in work places. Except Michigan’s civil rights legislation that prohibits employment discrimination and California, that includes weight in the definition of unlawful discrimination, no other rule that prohibits the discrimination of obese individuals. In addition, there are states in the United States such as San Francisco, Madison and Washington D.C that prohibit(Swami et al, 2008, p, 970). There needs to be more on public policy interventions that will look into the interests of the overweight people. The federal government should set the pace on how they should be treated equally in the all the social setups. The researchers and the health experts should work hand in hand with the authorities to help in the formulation of policies that focus on the employers and the motivational factors that will lead to the creation of healthy and safer programs in the workplaces. This implies that their research will be based in the identification of the employer’s monetary constraints and perceptions regarding people with obesity so that to develop policies that will aim at decreasing the weight bias in the workplace as well as improving the health of the employees( Swami et al, 2008, p, 972).
The society should stop the denial regarding the existence of stigma among the people with obesity. There is the need for the community to abandon the perceptions regarding obese individuals, consider them worth in the society, and stop measuring their health depending on how fat people are.
In the workplaces, the employers need to improve the attitudes while dealing with overweight and obese people. In most cases, employers develop strategies that they perceive will enhance the welfare of the obese employees but they work against them mainly due to how to execute those plans. It is commendable that they have begun taking actions without waiting for the guidance of the federal government to deal with problems arising in the organization set up. For instance, they should set more realistic individual goals by comprehending each, circumstances such as histories and conditions that will enable them to come up with ways to help obese individuals shed some weight and become more healthy.
Additionally, most employees usually provide unhealthy diets to their employees for the cases of those that work in night shifts or otherwise. Unhealthy eating habits promote such things as obesity, the same condition they are trying to fight. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the employees to always advocate for healthy eating whenever they can to ensure. They should also offer a supportive environment in that it encourages all the employees to practice safer and more robust lifestyles such as offering opportunities to become active physically(Gortmaker, 199, p. 410).
Rather than the employer looking at the costs of medication and the off days, the obese employees spend on; they should encourage them to become healthy so that they can be more productive. They ought to increase awareness to people with obesity as well as ensuring they access treatment to their conditions since it hardly improves without the correct form of treatment. On the same note, such people require follow up to ensure they are in perfect health as continue working for an organization.
The employer or the leadership of an organization need to take the lead in recognizing and appreciating people with obesity among them. Using negative stereotypes to define them and allocate them duties is unwarranted thus, in-depth interviews and evaluations should be the basis for determining what role they should play. They should be subject to economic penalty, demotions and unfair firing due to their conditions(Wolf " Colditz,1998 p. 100).
. The level of discrimination should stop starting from the top as well as encouraging the other employees to follow suit. By taking care of their needs, they will feel appreciated which will psych up their morale and motivation hence more productivity.
Other areas have been understudied but are potentials for obesity discrimination include the public accommodations where people with obesity can experience trouble. In the public settings such as airplanes, buses, trains, restaurants among others could cause challenges to obese people due to the sizes of the seats and other things such as seatbelts. Additionally, in the housing department, the overweight people face discrimination from the property owners according to a small study that involved obese and non –obese students who paused as seeking rental houses(Obesity-Preventing, W.H.O.)
The non-obese students were offered the rental units while the obese were denied. Besides, obesity is a potential barrier towards adopting a child in places that use the weight of a parent to criteria to determine the adoption process. Research should also not discriminate people with obesity. The underrepresentation of overweight persons is massive not unless it primarily focuses on obesity. For instance, research institutions usually fund the investigations of other ailments disregarding obesity, which is a complex condition in itself.
Limitations
Most of the studies on anti-obesity attitudes among different professionals such as hiring, educational, and medical have used the self -report techniques, a myriad of mentality assessing measures and non-random methods which have not been tested for reliability. Also, studies looking into discriminatory behaviors and attitudes have solely relied on samples from the students. Additionally, the literature is not significantly appropriate to come up with conclusions in areas where discriminations have been identified to occur. In addition, it is not entirely clear that discrimination occurs in higher intensities as obesity of an individual increase.
Discussion
Weight and obesity-related bias have become common in many social settings that have had immense social and economic challenges. With the identification of the causes of this stigma and prejudice, as well as the interventions necessary to end it, it is evident that it will reduce drastically. The researchers should conduct more research that will help in the formulation of policies to protect the obese population from harassment and discrimination and those that will promote a safer and healthy working environment.
Conclusion
The purpose of this paper was to examine the causes of bias in hiring, perceptions in the society regarding obesity as well as identifying measures to curb it. The identified interventions will lead to the decrease of weight based discrimination in workplaces.
Conflict of interest
None
Bibliography
Agne, A.A., Daubert, R., Munoz, M.L., Scarinci, I. and Cherrington, A.L., 2012. The cultural context of obesity: exploring perceptions of obesity and weight loss among Latina immigrants.Journal of immigrant and minority health, 14(6), pp.1063-1070.
Cogan, J.C., Bhalla, S.K., Sefa-Dedeh, A. and Rothblum, E.D., 1996.A comparison study of United States and African students on perceptions of obesity and thinness.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(1), pp.98-113.
Cunningham, G.B., Sartore, M.L. and McCullough, B.P., 2010. The influence of applicant sexual orientation, applicant gender, and rater gender on ascribed attributions and hiring recommendations of personal trainers.Journal of Sport Management, 24(4), pp.400-415.
Fikkan, J. and Rothblum, E., 2005. Weight Bias in Employment.
Giel, K.E., Thiel, A., Teufel, M., Mayer, J. and Zipfel, S., 2010.Weight bias in work settings–a qualitative review.Obesity facts, 3(1), pp.33-40.
Gortmaker, S.L., Peterson, K., Wiecha, J., Sobol, A.M., Dixit, S., Fox, M.K. and Laird, N., 1999. Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet Health.Archives of pediatrics " adolescent medicine, 153(4), pp.409-418.
Hebl, M.R. and Mannix, L.M., 2003. The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), pp.28-38.
James, P.T., Leach, R., Kalamara, E. and Shayeghi, M., 2001.The worldwide obesity epidemic.Obesity, 9(S11).
Larkin, J.C. and Pines, H.A., 1979. No fat persons need apply: experimental studies of the overweight stereotype and hiring preference. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 6(3), pp.312-327.
Mason, R.W. and Schroeder, M.P., 2010. Principal hiring practices: Toward a reduction of uncertainty.The Clearing House, 83(5), pp.186-193.
Neckerman, K.M. and Kirschenman, J., 1991. Hiring strategies, racial bias, and inner-city workers. Social Problems, 38(4), pp.433-447
Obesity-Preventing, W.H.O., 1997. managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity.Geneva: Who, pp.7-17.
Pingitore, R., Dugoni, B.L., Tindale, R.S. and Spring, B., 1994. Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), p.909.
Puhl, R. and Brownell, K.D., 2002. Stigma, discrimination, and obesity.Eating disorders and obesity: A comprehensive handbook, pp.108-112.
Puhl, R., Peterson, J.L. and Luedicke, J., 2013. Fighting obesity or obese persons?Public perceptions of obesity-related health messages.International Journal of Obesity, 37(6), p.774.
Puhl, R., Wharton, C. and Heuer, C., 2009. Weight bias among dietetics students: implications for treatment practices.Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(3), pp.438-444.
Puhl, R.M. and Heuer, C.A., 2009.The stigma of obesity: a review and update.Obesity, 17(5), pp.941-964.
Puhl, R.M., Moss-Racusin, C.A., Schwartz, M.B. and Brownell, K.D., 2007.Weight stigmatization and bias reduction: perspectives of overweight and obese adults. Health education research, 23(2), pp.347-358.
Rankinen, T., Zuberi, A., Chagnon, Y.C., Weisnagel, S.J., Argyropoulos, G., Walts, B., Pérusse, L. and Bouchard, C., 2006. The human obesity gene map: the 2005 update. Obesity, 14(4), pp.529-644.
Roehling, M.V., Roehling, P.V. and Pichler, S., 2007. The relationship between body weight and perceived weight-related employment discrimination: The role of sex and race.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(2), pp.300-318.
Rothblum, E.D., Miller, C.T., and Garbutt, B., 1988. Stereotypes of obese female job applicants.International Journal of Eating Disorders, 7(2), pp.277-283.
Rudolph, C.W., Wells, C.L., Weller, M.D. and Baltes, B.B., 2009. A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), pp.1-10.
Sartore, M.L., and Cunningham, G.B., 2007. Weight discrimination, hiring recommendations, person-job fit, and attributions: Fitness-industry implications. Journal of Sports Management, 21(2), pp.172-193.
Strauss, R.S., 2000. Childhood obesity and self-esteem.Pediatrics, 105(1), pp.e15-e15.
Swami, V., Chan, F., Wong, V., Furnham, A. and Tovée, M.J., 2008.Weight‐Based Discrimination in Occupational Hiring and Helping Behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(4), pp.968-981.
Swami, V., Pietschnig, J., Stieger, S., Tovee, M.J. and Voracek, M., 2010.An investigation of weight bias against women and its associations with individual difference factors.Body Image, 7(3), pp.194-199.
Wada, K., Tamakoshi, K., Tsunekawa, T., Otsuka, R., Zhang, H., Murata, C., Nagasawa, N., Matsushita, K., Sugiura, K., Yatsuya, H. and Toyoshima, H., 2005.Validity of self-reported height and weight in a Japanese workplace population.International journal of obesity, 29(9), p.1093.
Washington, R.L., 2011. Peer reviewed: Childhood obesity: Issues of weight bias. Preventing chronic disease, 8(5).
Wolf, A.M. and Colditz, G.A., 1998. Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obesity, 6(2), pp.97-106.
