The United States and North Korea have had a tense policy relationship for decades (Easley, 14). North Korea, officially known as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), has been accused by the US of trying to advance its nuclear program. According to the US, North Korea's nuclear program poses a threat not only to America's allies, such as South Korea and Japan but also to the US mainland (Ghitis, 5). More importantly, the US has made unprecedented attempts to stop the North's production of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, which it claims represents the largest danger to American citizens. On this note, the United States foreign policy with North Korea must be looked at in the context of its allies within the Korean peninsula. Besides security interests in this region, United States has economic interests as well. In this way, nuclear attack by the North to its allies will negatively affect Americas massive investment in the peninsula (Easley, 21). On its side, North Korea accuses United States of meddling in the peninsulas economic, regional, social, and security affairs. According to North Korea, it is pretentious for the United States to prevent the North from developing its nuclear program, yet America and several countries have nuclear arsenal. Further, North Korea has accused America of pushing for economic sanctions, which are aimed to prevent the nuclear program (Farago, 1136). Based on these main issues, the foreign policy between United States and North Korea has worsened over the years. The following paper wishes to highlight some of the main issues in the United States-North Korea relations and the reasons for changes in the U.S. policy. Further, this paper provides several options to policy changes, the pros and cons of each option and the best option for the United States. The objective of the paper is to show that although there are several options, diplomatic process remains to be the most viable solution to United States-North Korea foreign policy. Main Issues between United States and North Korea As noted above the both United States and North Korea have basic issues that have negatively influenced their poor relationship. The tension in the Korean peninsula rose when an international investigative report revealed that North Korea was responsible for the sinking of the warship from the South Korea (Easley, 26). The Korean War and the nuclear program development by the North have made both the South and the North become long term enemies. On this basis, United States consider North Korea as the greatest threat to its allies and its interests in the peninsula. Therefore, the United States concern is the consistent threat posed by nuclear program (Farago, 1135). Connectedly, America has taken the position that peace and stability of the region, as well as its relationship with North Korea, can only be achieved if the North stops its nuclear program. In addition, United States is alarmed by the intention of developing ICBM by the North, which is to strike Americas mainland. On the other hand, North Korea is determined to continue with its nuclear program (Easley, 23). The intention is to not only become a nuclear state and be recognized as such by the international community, but also use such weapons to strike and defend itself from its enemies, especially United States. The DPRK has raised concerns over Americas intention to strike its territory. Therefore, North Korea sees United States and its allies as its enemies. Another issue is the direct sanctions imposed by American administration and through United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which the North interprets as an attempt to interfere with its sovereignty. The Need for Policy Change Despite the efforts made by the United States in preventing the north from continuing with its nuclear program, it is clear that the past approaches have not worked. In fact, recent events such as testing the long range and intercontinental missiles have shown that North Korea is in the process of becoming a nuclear state (Easley, 24). Further, the economic sanctions by the United States and United Nations have not significantly affected the program. According to experts, such economic sanctions are negatively affecting the poor citizens in the DPRK, whose life has become economically unbearable (Squassoni, 374). In addition, the continued threats by leaders from North Korea and America have only raised tension in the Korean peninsula. Based on these and other reasons, there is need to review the United States policy and strategy toward solving the North Korean problem. Several Options to Policy Changes In reference to the above observation, several options have been considered. In solving the North Korean nuclear program issue, one of the options that are widely mentioned is launching of a military intervention (Minnich, 36). The main advantage of striking nuclear sites, installation and any other specific targets is that United States will be making its intention clear that North Korean must stop the nuclear program. However, it must be noted that North Korea has nuclear weapons, which it will apply once attacked (Easley, 19). The result is that millions of lives could be lost. Further, such action will affect not only the neighboring countries, but also the entire world. Another option would be doing nothing, thus maintaining the status quo (Easley, 13). The status quo is that North Korea will be allowed to continue with its nuclear program and United States and its allies in the peninsula will remain the Norths first enemies. Further, the current economic sanctions will continue being in place, which, as noted above, may not stop North Korea from advancing its nuclear program. The main disadvantage to such step is that due to the aggressive nature of the North Korean leadership, the use of nuclear weapons could take place anytime in the future. Imposing more sanctions is another option to the North Korea nuclear program. However, it is clear that more sanctions will not make any difference (Easley, 15). According to foreign policy experts, North Korean president, Kim, would let his citizens eat grass in order to keep his nuclear weapons (Minnich, 35). Therefore, placing more sanctions will make matters worse by negatively affecting North Korean people, instead of solving the current stalemate. Consequently, applying more diplomatic approach is the most suitable option in not only solving the problem on the North Korean nuclear program, but also improving the relationship between United States and DPRK. The Most Applicable Option Notably, experts have warned that the current rhetoric between united states and north Korea will lead to war that might end up causing massive property destruction and loss of lives. Although negotiation talks are often raised time and again, there are no deliberate efforts to bring the two nations and their allies together (Easley, 11). In embracing the need to have a diplomatic talk, it would be vital to explore what each party has to accept or to concede. Over the years, the United States debate over policy options toward DPRK has suffered from failure to have candor on all sides. Apparently, calling for military strikes, such as those conducted in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, is a way of showing Washingtons inability to use wide range of diplomatic options. The policymakers in the United States need to understand that based on the inevitable retaliation from the North and the mass casualties that will occur, military option should not be on the table (Squassoni, 373). In the diplomatic efforts, a freeze for freeze approach should be incorporated. In this approach, North Korea should stop nuclear and missile tests, while United States should halt its military exercises with the South. The U.S should convey to the DPRK and the international community that it is ready to talk without preconditions. However, other countries such as South Korea, Japan, China, and Russia must be involved, as was the case in the Six-Party model. The model should only be used as formal mechanism of guiding the diplomatic talks. However, the real responsibility should be done by Pyongyang and Washington. While the direct talk between these two nations continues, close allies such as Japan and South Korean should play a supporting role. On its side, China should be encouraged to convince Pyongyang in halting its nuclear tests and the willingness of Washington to have a peaceful Korean peninsula. Summary and Conclusion In the above discussion, it is clear that poor relationship between United States and North Korea is exacerbated by the Norths nuclear program. Notably, United States fears that North Korea could strike its allies and its mainland, while DPRK is concerned about Americas interference with its sovereignty. In solving the current stalemate, some of the options highlighted include military action, more sanctions, doing nothing, and diplomatic process. Among these options, a diplomatic solution is the most suitable since it will avoid mass causalities, destruction of property, and displacements, while halting the nuclear program. Works Cited Primary Sources: Easley, Leif-Eric. "From Strategic Patience to Strategic Uncertainty: Trump, North Korea, and South Koreas New President." World Affairs, vol. 180, no. 2, Summer2017, pp. 7-31. Squassoni, Sharon. "Through a Fractured Looking-Glass: Trumps Nuclear Decisions so Far." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 73, no. 6, Nov. 2017, pp. 370-375. Farago, NIV. "Washington's Failure to Resolve the North Korean Nuclear Conundrum: Examining Two Decades of US Policy." International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 5, Sept. 2016, pp. 1127-1145. Supplementary Sources; Ghitis, Frida. "Trump Really Likes Dictators. That's a Problem for U.S. Foreign Policy." World Politics Review (Selective Content), 04 May 2017, pp. 1-6. Minnich, James M. "North Korea Policy: Changed Regime." Military Review, vol. 97, no. 6, Nov/Dec2017, pp. 39-53.
Type your email