Toulmin Model of Argument in Writing

By encouraging the growth of new ideas based on preexisting ones through discussion forums and inquiry, "making knowledge free and open-sourced has the potential to accelerate human development." The claim in this thesis would be the first component, which is: "Making knowledge free and open-sourced can accelerate human progress," in line with Clements' podcast "Argument and the Toulmin Model." The argument's basic premise—that knowledge is easily accessible and can hasten human development—would serve as the warrant. Although I firmly believe this to be true, others' perspectives may differ.
While outlining the case, it is important to emphasize each of Clements' arguments. The logos of this argument would be the available research and studies proving that easy availability and accessibility of knowledge enhances human development. The ethos of this argument would be the idea that knowledge is an essential element in the society from the fact that it triggers the evolution of new ideas based on existing ones; therefore, it is a moral obligation to make knowledge free and open-sourced. The pathos of this argument would come from the importance of human development. Some people miss certain vital aspects of human development because they cannot freely and easily access knowledge. The fallacies that I might want to avoid with this argument are the emotional fallacies. I would avoid causing either anger, sadness, or feelings of happiness to express my argument. In this regard, I would avoid using bandwagon appeals, sentimental appeals, or scare tactics in making people believe in my ideas. The audience is likely to agree with my warrant because my basis of argument and my use of the logical appeals are conclusive.



Reference

Clements, K. (2013, September 6). The three appeals of argumentative writing [Podcast]. Effective Writing Podcast Series. Retrieved from http://www.screencast.com/t/8gyyeFs27