In summary, the topic has expounded large-scale primary knowledge on the harmful health effects of smoking as most bodies and health professionals bound it to adverse risks, diseases, health harm and a possible cause of premature deaths. The project has created a greater concern on the need for building better projects to facilitate awareness of the health concerns of the smoking practice. Of importance, the research has acknowledged that smoking serves a critical instantiation of greater interests to sociologists. They are capable of relating the practice to particular cognitive behaviors. Notably, it has extensively explored the environmental and health effects of tobacco agriculture, the manufacture of cigarette and its consumption. It is a health concern issue that must be death with as it slowly eats up the healthy segment of the human population and renders it almost useless.
There are a number of strategies and solutions to the problem entirely highlighted in the project. There is a need for more projects to diversely highlight and create better awareness of the need for tobacco processing firms and companies to execute operational policies that limit environmental degradation through the implementation of corporate social responsibility programs. These future projects must further acknowledge the importance of enhancing public protection against tobacco industrial impacts as aligned in FCTC Article 5.3 guidelines. It is crucial to establish a community concern across the multiple economic segments of health, agriculture, environment and trade with an agenda to conclusively address the health and environmental impacts related to tobacco production and consumption. The involved parties must consider a broader approach as a new strategy that includes the non-governmental organizations, the academia as well as the non-party countries. It is categorical that tobacco control directly intersects with highly pressing global concerns like the execution of environmental policies, trade agreements, sustainable development, human rights concerns and issues regarding climate change.
Of importance, adopting broader and effective actions against the hazards generated by tobacco use will help to reduce tobacco demand and hence, reduce the associated health impacts. Moreover, there will be elevated costs for these products, a reduction in social acceptance of its consumption and possibly better changes and termination of the commonly consumed tobacco products. Adoption of policy strategies and recommendations regarding alternatives to tobacco cultivation must be largely comprehensive, and practicable on environmental oriented large-scale control interventions for both the growing and non-growing states. Parties must identify, limit, treat and further monitor tobacco growing practices among both farmers and workers. Developing strategies that aim at freeing the farmers from unfair and unsafe growth and labor-oriented practices is considered necessary. It will strengthen the existing regulations that fight against the extreme health concerns associated with tobacco use to limit degradation and resultant land degradation practices.
Policy regulation parties must aim at reducing, mitigation and prevention of manufacturing and the post-utilization of the products of tobacco wastes. It will facilitate extension of the sale of tobacco products and regulatory policies for eliminating single-use filters that entail any form of biodegradable varieties to reduce and further mitigate post-consumption wastes that result into extreme health defects. Such practices will engage litigation and associated economic interventions to establish a recovery of costs of industry misconduct that would likely result in extreme environmental damages. Creation of better innovation platforms for improving and enforcing better or currently implemented tobacco use regulation to limit ecological consequences as they apply to the transportation, management, and parameters of post-consumption wastes. The strategy can further be facilitated through assigning of aggressive teams essentially determined to develop better skills that bring together research and comprehensive literature resources that can address the trending health problems of tobacco on a global scale to limit its side effects to the society. Notably, such an experience will influence the access boards by improving governance and thinking capacity by expounding their reasoning base. They will be presently capable of addressing more complicated topics on factors that would compromise the well-being of humans and their quality of life following the trends on tobacco consumption.
The contemporary public health approaches should seek to draw better attention to the unequal societal based distribution of cigarette smoking. The sociological approach implemented should be employed across all the three dimensions of history and social changes, social structures, and power as well as individual agency and experience to articulate distinct systematic and positive claims regarding tobacco as an object of sociological inquiries. Introducing campaigns on smoking prohibitions will be essential a fight towards reducing indoor air pollution and the associated health risks among millions of populations on a worldwide scale. Certainly, more prohibitive strategies in outdoor sections like the beaches, urban areas or parks will inclusively limit butt waste from entirely flowing into aquatic environs. As a form of a disciple, individuals can challenge their friends and communities in tobacco control by joining several environmental change movements and forces with the need to allocate solutions towards eliminating the toxic form of trash. If all the recommendations are diversely practiced and focused upon, then the resultant environmental and health impacts of tobacco will seize to be a menace.
