The joint commission system
The joint commission system demonstrates a strong interest in supporting a safe and high-quality healthcare system, with the primary goal of avoiding patient harm (Bahadori et al., 2014). From its inception, the contract has championed patient well-being by supporting healthcare businesses to develop on the value and protection care on offer. The report will assess behavioral healthcare as a joint commission topic of interest. The goals of the debate include increasing pharmaceutical safety and lowering the risk of linked healthcare infections. Before the intervention of the joint commissions, several healthcare institutions had been experiencing the problem of the medication reconciliation (Heyworth et al., 2013). Perhaps, the clinicians have been showing partial and the insufficient understanding of the original prescription of drugs and the exact medicine such people utilize. Additionally, it appears hectic in obtaining the entire list from the individual people, usually patients after medication to assess responses. As a result, the cases of incorrect information act as a great hindrance.<\/p>
Ideally, there is the need to ascertain that this goal is realistic
The strategies in place to achieve the outcome are defined and all geared towards attaining accuracy in the medication reconciliation. For instance, there is varied coordination of the information both within and outside the care institutions and exceptional awareness to the individuals during drug use. However, in the implementation of the goal, there are challenges such as failure by some organizations to enforce the behavioral healthcare (Muller et al., 2013). As well, some facilities lack proper prescription of treatment. The fastening of the implementation requires that all health sectors should be encouraged to store all the medication records while informing the patients to have formal storage of the health records. The practice habit relative to safety meditation exercise is the presumptions by the care organizations that patients do follow the instructions strictly once out of the premise. However, this is impartial. The healthcare sectors should, therefore, conduct necessary follow-up to reinforce the compliance with the regulation.<\/p>
Second Goal: To Reduce the Risk of Associated Healthcare Infections<\/h2>
Often, infections are very eminent when patients undergo treatments, usually due to the unhygienic practices and conditions. Apparently, the situation is exacerbated by the physical contact between the parties (Magil et al., 2014). This goal is realistic as it seeks to enforce the sanitary procedures by the key institutions like the CDC and WHO to reduce the transmission of diseases that occur during medication.<\/p>
The obstacle impeding the implementation of this proposal
is the negligence and lack of strict adherence to the rules, requirements, and the standards of the key healthcare institutions such as WHO and CDC by the care providers (Magil et al., 2014). A timely implementation needs the scrutiny of the Medicare organizations to ensure their strict compliance with the safety standards. The practice habit I would suggest is the extension of the hand sanitation both to the patients as well. The sick should be thoroughly evaluated before attending to them so that they limit the chances of infecting the staff as well.<\/p>
Overall, the joint commission has a greater role in the behavioral healthcare
In the process, it assists in improving the safety using treatments by helping in the medication reconciliation. However, the action faces the challenges such as the failure by some organizations to reinstate the behavioral healthcare and lack of proper prescription treatment. Additionally, the contract reduces the risk of associated care infections especially due to the poor sanitary virtues. The exercise has the limitation of the improper upholding of the set standards by the key international bodies like the CDC and the WHO.<\/p>
References
Bahadori, M., Ravangard, R., Yaghoubi, M., & Alimohammadzadeh, K. (2014). Assessing the service quality of Iran military hospitals: Joint Commission International Standards and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. Journal of education and health promotion, 3(1), 98.
Heyworth, L., Paquin, A. M., Clark, J., Kamenker, V., Stewart, M., Martin, T., & Simon, S. R. (2013). Engaging patients in medication reconciliation via a patient portal following hospital discharge. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(e1), e157-e162.
Magill, S. S., Edwards, J. R., Bamberg, W., Beldavs, Z. G., Dumyati, G., Kaiser, M. A., & Ray, S. M. (2014). Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(13), 1198-1208.
Mueller, S. K., Kripalani, S., Stein, J., Kaboli, P., Wetterneck, T. B., Salanitro, A. H., ... & Schnipper, J. (2013). A toolkit to disseminate best practices in inpatient medication reconciliation: multi-center medication reconciliation quality improvement study (MARQUIS). Tools to Make Medication Reconciliation Work.
