The Decline of Political Power and its Impact on Artificial Intelligence
The story of the decline of political power serves as the dialectical foundation on which thoughts on artificial intelligence take hold of the mediating leadership roles and how they can be connected to a nation's general populace. The article on humanistic moments in international studies, which is an in-depth reflection of the ideas that leaders like Las Casas and Machiavelli made it appear that they were living their ideas and had better ways on how others could apply them, hence the aforementioned article, makes it seemingly known that they were living their ideas and had better ways on how others could apply them. More, on the other hand, writes in close proximity to the thoughts that Machiavelli thus making it quite difficult for an individual who does not follow their writings closely to form a clear boundary between the two. By so saying, I mean to imply that there are numerous ideas that appear in both the one presented by More and that which was written by Machiavelli.
The Relationship Between Religion and Politics
The reason as to why Machiavelli and More are almost alike in terms of their article oratory is majorly due to the fact that they were responding to the same issues thus the same line of thought. Religion and politics are often two distinct fields that have caused a lot of controversies. The latter have arisen owing to the heated debate on whether leaders should use the religious platform as their campaign joint or rather treat religion and politics as two fields that have no connection to each other. On the same note, James Nendza seems to be arguing put that the two are distinct and ought to be treated. Nendza argues by including the thoughts that were presented by Locke and Machiavelli who are known to be the founding heads behind the modern republican government that is perceived to be a theoretical perspective.
The Impact on Material Prosperity and Civil Peace
Material prosperity, the natural rights of human beings and civil peace are feared to be the essential aspects that would be interfered with if at all politics and religion are treated as aspects that have a precise correlational connection. Even though Locke an Machiavelli disagree on most of the issues regarding the relationship between religion and politics, they are for the fact that if Churches are accorded extreme power then some of the goals linked to human co-existence may otherworldly cause a tussle that would not be hard to end. In accordance with the article on humanism in international studies, the author succinctly points out a global map that plays a pivotal role that is not only continental but also intermediatory. The reason being that it forms the basis on which allied arts and humanities are pegged, in the surety of ensuring the survival of both plants and human beings.
Machiavelli's Influence on International Relations
On most instances, Machiavelli has had connections shared in as far as international relations are concerned since he is greatly associated with the conquering and expansion of kingdoms and empires. In efforts to attempt to reconstruct the re-discovery of post-modernity and humanities back to renaissance, Machiavelli seems to have taken the right route. Casas on the other hand, was just as accurate yet his remarks regarding the post-colonial world order seems to have taken longer as opposed to that which was taken by Machiavelli. Even though More an Machiavelli seem to be on the same page in pertinence to the political and religious issues, they differ on some of the matters that Casas and Machiavelli find themselves rather comfortable to agree on which completely juxtaposes their stands on world matters.
Bibliography
Alker, Hayward R. Rediscoveries and reformulations: Humanistic methodologies for international studies. Vol. 41. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Nendza, James. "Religion and Republicanism in More's Utopia." Western Political Quarterly 37, no. 2 (1984): 195-211.
Schauer, Frederick. "Too Hard: Unconstitutional Conditions and the Chimera of Constitutional Consistency." Denv. UL Rev. 72 (1994): 989.
