If a project is successfully finished, the integration approach should be used as the closing strategy. This is primarily because it makes it possible to incorporate the project's ingredients for a successful close into its risk management components. It specifically deals with how effective project resources are distributed among the project's many components and integrated into those sections. As a result, the future functionalities that are a part of the project's follow-up activities will simply be handled by the line of organization.
It is conceivable for the project to fail to be finished successfully. One of the reasons for this would be the inability by the website to offer a program that would enable the communication by counselors to the marines due to the lack of necessary resources as a result of sponsors pulling out. This would make it difficult to have a proper report on the project at the end of it as there will be no delivered output to compare with the initially planned output. In this case, it is the starvation method that would be appropriately used for the closure of the project since there will no longer be need to apply any of the resources in the project (Heldman, 2015).
Thus, the only methods of closing a project that will not be used in this case are the addition and extinction. These may pose some concerns in the project that include addition which indicates implementation through the evolution to ongoing projects. Extraction involves the completion and acceptance by stakeholders like the use of the website by Marines.
References
Heldman, K. (2015). PMP project management professional exam deluxe study guide: updated for the 2015 Exam. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
We will email this sample to you with pleasure!
Type your email