The proponents of nuclear energy state that it is a cleaner and more sustainable option to burning fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. This is because these substances do not emit carbon dioxide which translates to the global climate change. Another argument is that it is cost-effective and reliable, hence, it is an essential constituent of the economy and the electric grid.
The opponents to the use of nuclear energy state that it is more expensive as compared to the renewable sources of energy. It is also hostile to the environment because of the radioactive wastes that it generates. In addition, the safety and security of the energy are put into question because of the threat of accidents, terrorist attacks at power plants, and the potential that the civic nuclear technology holds in leading to the propagation of nuclear weapons.
Can Nuclear Power Be Green?
Nuclear power does not lead to global warming because fission does not produce polluting combustion gases. On the other hand, the clean and natural way of producing nuclear energy through the ordinary decay of uranium beneath the earth’s surface powers geothermal plants. Fusion creates more energy and lesser nuclear waste through the same process that fuels the sun.
However, nuclear waste is not environmental friendly hence it cannot be green. It contaminates the soil, water, and food crops making them unsafe for human consumption. When human beings are exposed to these radiations, the human cells are genetically modified resulting in increased risks of cancer, birth defects, and other related serious health conditions. However, the waste can be disposed of in eco-friendly ways although they do not guarantee total safety.
The huge costs of maintenance, replacement, and decommissioning of the nuclear power plants also make it less desirable (Gale).
Work Cited
Gale . Nuclear Energy: Opposing Viewpoints. 2017. http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=OVIC"u=lincclin_bwcc"id=GALE%7CPC3010999227"v=2.1"it=r"asid=8f888068. 2 June 2018.
