Importance of Private Sector-Intelligence Community Relationship in Prevention of WMD

Expanding security motivation technological improvement, as well as building a business community for business insight merchants supplying information previously unavailable to the general public. Because of the data disruption, the traditional knowledge group no longer has an outstanding business model on the abilities or data required to analyze, investigate, or mitigate current security threats (Collins, 2016). A stronger partnership between the commercial sector and the intelligence agency would encourage faster information sharing. It would also boost intelligence community accountability. This advancement is essential in the spread of weapons of mass devastation (WMD).  Global internet web and technological innovations pose a challenge to proliferation. Proliferators have networks with their financiers through global financial systems. The private industries, in their profitmaking drive, are vulnerable to the conspiracy of the terrorists with a promise of huge profits. It is within the jurisdiction of the treasury classifying these activities as “money laundering” (Collins, 2016)

Emergency Manager Role in Improving the Relationship

While there are distinctive apparatuses intended to unite the private sector agents and the intelligence community. Receiving a completely incorporated virtual condition is imperative in upgrading the connection between the intelligence community and the private-sector. Such straightening measures will have the extra advantage of diminishing the level of division and absence of responsibility between leaders and experts.

An emergency manager should concentrate on recognizing and exchanging better business knowledge instruments; constant situational awareness, incorporated data administration, and relevant correspondence empowering agents would enhance the relationship and guarantee adequacy. The manager devise methods aimed at adjusting the numerous client knowledge developments being utilized so adequately in the publicizing business to discover experiences into the conduct of information collection, and also the conduct of intelligence agents.

Dilemmas in Nuclear Proliferation

Two dilemmas are observed in the nuclear proliferation process. First is the “Loose Nukes” (The Great Unknown) The single most prominent obstacle to a psychological militant's manufacture of an atomic gadget is the obtaining of weapons-usable nuclear material. If fear-based oppressors can master cure such material in place, they can skip this most difficult part of the atomic weapons advancement cycle. Private proliferators and the "dark market" for nuclear trafficking represent another growing risk (Williams, 2012). The uncertainty of atomic materials, consolidated with the dispersion of the specialized learning necessary to build or amass a nuclear gadget, has brought about a thriving industry for entrepreneurial go-betweens, as showed in Libya.

Impacts of Proliferation Control Regimes and Non-proliferation Control Regimes

Despite the fact that non-proliferation administrations are a valuable apparatus in forestalling perilous innovation exchanges, a few components undermine their viability. One is the trouble of tending to hidden inspirations of nations to procure weapons of mass decimation (WMD). A few states may need WMD to overwhelm their enemies (Williams, 2012). Notoriety is another motivation behind why certain countries look for WMD. The rocket limitation administration of 1987, the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), will likely reduce the spread of missiles equipped for conveying atomic weapons (Collins, 2016). The administration has obstructed a few rocket programs. However, it has failed to stop rocket improvement in North Korea and Iran.

























References

Collins, A. (2016). Contemporary security studies. Oxford university press.

Williams, P. D. (Ed.). (2012). Security studies: an introduction. Routledge.