Corporate Governance

Leadership in a company is often used to improve the organization's facilities. Various nations have strict laws in place that these businesses can follow. In the long run, these will be the instruments used to assess the firm's strength. According to Sandoval (2014, p. 200), it is concerned with the processes, laws, and practices that a company can use in its operations. Nonetheless, narrow concepts often center on the partnerships between chief executives, the board of directors, and different stakeholders. On the other hand, broad interpretations of the subject matter include the relationship of the multiple corporations to all its stakeholders and the community covering all state laws and regulations. Additionally, it states various rules and voluntary private company practices that have an impact on the attraction of more capital, profit, and attainment of efficiency. According to a statement by Blackburn (2012, p. 163), various companies have been convinced that company management is a journey towards sustainability. Britain wishes to have a relatively high financial strength on the global market and influence the various production activities executed in various parts of the world. The realization of this goal can be linked to the highly developed framework for corporate governance. Various theories have been applied in the creation of the policies that will act as a guideline on the implementation of various program in these companies.

Importance of the concept

The UK wanted to act as the pioneers to corporate governance providing suggestions on the best measures that a manager can use in administering various activities. The finance sector is often observed with the acts of implementing corporate governance. Business stability will reduce the chances of seeking external support from other business partners or companies. For example, Lloyd Bank plc is a British retail and commercial bank that concentrates with monetary businesses in the UK and other parts of the world. The presence of stiff competition forces the Bank to implement these policies and maintain its status of being the undisputed regional leader. A researcher can use this aspect to analyse the model of operations that are implemented in the firm.

Corporate governance involves the practices of performance and conformance. The factor of compliance encompasses the aspect of monitoring the performance of the firm and the executive officers. The application of this concept is a significant asset to the UK with the intentions of competing in the global economy and providing a reputation for being a dependable area for other companies to do business. The attainment of this goal can be derived from the concepts of marinating corporate governance up to date. Various sectors in the country need to be improved help in the country attain its goals.

The government published the Green Paper indicating a series of changes required in the executive pay, corporate governance in the large private-held businesses, and the steps that a company boards take to engage with its clients, employees, and other interested parties. Based on the interpretation of these provisions, the government is likely to register significant development programs that will help in the attainment of its goals. It is further documented that the Green paper attracted an estimated 375 responses from various business entities and society providing the government with an ideal baseline to take decisions (Colino & Furse, 2011, p. 142). Additionally, it has also registered a series of benefits from the work of the business, energy, and the industrial strategy committee that help in the act of publishing recommendations for the practices of corporate governance.

Themes Emerging from the Responses and Consultations

First, in relation to the concept of executive remunerations, there were extensively held apprehensions that a small minority of corporations are not providing an adequate response when they meet essential shareholder. The majority of these groups are resistant to the aspects of executive payments and that the various salary boards need to improve on their services through acts of demonstrating that they are willing to pay and meet the various conditions through the wider employees. The concept of executive pay can further be elaborated on the basis of pay ratio, pay protest register and another type of proposals that the interested parties raise any.

According to the adjustment that is being made on the pay ratio, the government was to introduce the issues of secondary legislation that was to act as a guide on listed companies reporting annually in their remuneration reports. It further encompasses the ration of the CEO pay or the average pay of other people working in the UK along with a narrative of making an explanation on any changes that this ratio from year to year and its relation to the pay conditions across the region (Thomas & Hill, 2012, p. 58). Furthermore, the pay protest register involves the practices of naming and shaming particular companies. For instance, the government is making a proposition to invite the Investment Association to collate and maintain a public register of the listed companies who have encountered a shareholder percentage of 20 or more on the executive pay.

Secondly, an extensively held interpretation that the majority of the large companies in the regions could increase their capabilities of strengthening the employees, customers, suppliers and comprehensive stakeholders’ concerns at the boardroom level. It is often viewed as a critical factor in the process of improving the aspect of boardroom decision-making, providing more reliable business enactment and creation of a more extensive public self-assurance in the way business transactions can be run. In the long run, these firms are likely to register an improved rate of customer retention and realizing the concept of competitive advantage in a shorter period compared to the competing companies. Additionally, these businesses will also have the ability to register higher income generation practices hence helping in the process of attaining financial stability in the industry.

The third concept is related to issues of transparency and accountability; the government analysed that there should be more practices of transparency and responsibility for the acts of corporate governance in large privately-apprehended companies. The primary goal is to help in the concepts of reflecting their financial and social implication in the market. The utilization of a proper basis will assist in the activities of providing financial assistance to other companies in the same market sphere. Similarly, the attainment of financial stability can also assist in the acts of dictating a significant portion of the business activities that are being carried out in the industry.

The Government has now published its answer to the conference pointing out the various set of proposals that it would like to take forward in the process of addressing these activities and various corporate governance concerns. Nevertheless, these concepts encompass an amalgamation of secondary law-making, improvements to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Financial Reporting Council usually oversees the idea) and the voluntary business-led actions.

The concept of secondary law making refers to the various forms of legislation that are not Acts of Parliament. According to Brölmann & Radi (2016, p. 141), the concept is familiar to the issues of administrative law in the United States. The legislative branch of governments often delegate power to allow various ministers in the country to make the various pieces of secondary legislation. Furthermore, the secondary legislations include directives, regulations, and decisions that are being made by commissions or councils. Nevertheless the majority of the Acts of Parliament in the UK contain certain provisions that accept secondary legislations. According to the interpretation of Susan Rose-Ackerman (2015, p. 191), the various types of secondary legislation include; delegated and prerogative legislation. On the other hand, the UK Corporate Governance Code dictates the criterions of good practice for recorded companies on board arrangement and development, payment, shareholder dealings, responsibility and auditing. The code is always documented by the Financial Reporting Council. The code is also used in the practices of prescribing the expected actions and behaviours of the board of directors in a company. It further includes the aspect of setting the tones on the values through the firm. The code was recently corrected in the month of June 2016 with these modifications being operative for the period that commenced after the 17th of June the same year.

Impact of the Amendments to Business Operations

According to the concepts of leadership, the Code’s provisions recommend the regular board conferences in the company. Additionally, the code includes the distinctive and unconnected duties of the chairman and the chief executive of that company. According to interpretation by Sheehan (2012, p. 146), the code also advocates for non-executives to make applications of scepticism with the intentions to make a challenge in certain organizational activities and also make some scrutiny in practices of management at the company.

The concept of effectiveness focuses on the company’s size, employees’ skills, capability and the steadiness of the non-executive and senior manager in the company. It should also be adequate to respond to the complication of the business activities and its industry. The non-executive managers in the company should be independent of limited control emerging from other departments. Additionally, the board appointment, evaluation practices, and re-selection dealings should be with a limited aspect of bias and discrimination. Therefore, all directors in these companies, especially the non-executive, must have the ability to exhibit the concepts of commitment whilst attaining significant levels of support from the top management. The major goal of this act is to create an interpretation of the various business activities and its industry.

The code also discusses the values of accountability in any business transactions. For instance, the board of any company should have the ability to make excellent presentations to its employees. On the other hand, there should be an aspect of balanced and comprehensible valuation activities of the corporation’s position and projections in the annual report. It will also help in the practices of identifying the sectors that need levels of adjustment. Additionally, the company’s directors should state in yearly and half-yearly financial statements whether there is a need to consider it an appropriate activity to adopt the working apprehension basis of accounting in preparing them. It should also play a significant role in the acts of identifying any material reservations to the firm’s ability to continue to do its activities over a stipulated period of at least one year. The analysis is often executed from the day of endorsement of the company’s financial statements.

In addition to a declaration that the trade is a going concern, the leaders in that company should publish a proclamation validating that they have a realistic anticipation that the corporation will have the ability to continue executing its mandate. Additionally, they are to achieve its obligations as they fall due in a particular duration which is considered as the length of which these activities must also be revealed (Mallin, 2016, p. 71). The directors' in each company are also held responsible for the acts of making a robust valuation of the primary risks facing the business and also have a specific obligation for scrutinizing the corporation's risk management and internal control arrangements. Furthermore, it is involved in the activities of ensuring that they are sound whereas also upholding an appropriate connection with the firm’s auditors. The audit committee and the firm’s sub-committee of the panel should have the capacity to look at various financial reporting concepts and the workings that have been done by both the internal and external auditors. Similarly, at least one member of the audit committee in the company must be a qualified accountant and also a member of any accounting body in the region. It will play a significant role in the aspects of keeping the management updated with the various accounting activities that will help improve the model of bookkeeping implemented in the company.

Regarding the issue of creating better relations with the shareholders, the code further indicates that all directors in the company should be fully conscious of the shareholders’ worries and sentiments at any time. The code also offers no exemptions to the practice even though the chief administrative personnel in the company and the finance director will have a higher bond in the aspects of direct interaction with other major shareholders. Nevertheless, the annual general meeting held by the firm is also considered as an effective procedure of preserving contact with the shareholders, and these directors should also help in the practices of encouraging shareholder participation.

The Code further includes a provision that is requiring these companies to make an explanation on what set of actions they expect to take in reaction to the instances where a momentous percentage of ballots have been cast in contradiction of determination at any general meeting. It is predominantly considered as a relevant factor to the resolutions on administrators' compensation programs. The issue of complying with the Code hardly provides a guarantee of good governance in the company. The directors are left with the aspect of ensuring that the unique conditions set in their Company will provide a similar response irrespective of an inclusion of a tailored intervention.

Furthermore, the Code recommends that the company’s Chairman makes a report individually in the company’s annual statements and making indications on the way the principles linking to the duties and efficiency of the panel have been applied (Plessis & Low, 2017, p. 115). Additionally, the Code should be followed on the basis of complying or making an explanation on the basis where a firm may find that there is a need of an alternative approach in the execution of various activities. The unconventional approach may be more advantageous towards the concepts of good leadership than provisions indicated in the Code. In that instance, the firm must offer to enlighten the position in the yearly statements.

Compliance and Non-Compliance

The board of directors of the company has the mandate of drawing the operation proceeds to be applied in the firm. However, the stakeholder and employees are also involved in the practices of providing suggestions but offered limited opportunities in the practices of decision making in the institution. The violations of this conduct may lead to the termination of the worker’s contract or a suspicion from a particular committee held with the mandate of implementing a specific program.

The issue of compliance with this practice can also be linked to the impact of Brexit on the UK economy and market share on the global market. Nevertheless, the Brexit referendum has further forced the UK Government to make improvements on corporate governance. The major target is to increase the issues of self-sufficiency in an effort to guarantee the UK’s leading position as the contribution the best possible environments in which companies may operate. On the other hand, the government is making plans to bring legislation before Parliament by March 2018, with the hopes of it getting into effect in the month of June 2018. It also offers significant time to various companies to initiate development programs that will help in the attainment of competitive advantage in the industry. However, these set of reforms target the director’s ability for evaluation, employee’s representation on panel meetings, executive payment systems, and the private company loyalty to the Corporate Governance Code.

The existence of the Brexit program has offered a particular level of confidence to the UK companies in being the leading providers in certain businesses on the global market. It then reflects on the estimated amount of income that is likely to be collected from the services that they are to offer to the public (Clarke et al., 2012, p. 118). The companies are then left with a single opportunity to meeting the desired demand of the market and provision of customer satisfaction in the market. In the long run, these companies will enjoy significant profits from the activities that they are offering to the market. It is further published that the identified changes in the organization of the UK economy that are in view as an outcome of Brexit will entail the aspects of company law and corporate governance arrangements that are adequately permitting and also stated as flexible to offer significant response appropriately to the fluctuating positions and needs of corporations.

Next steps and timing

After the invitation by the government, the FRC has provided a confirmation statement that it will make a series of consultations on the various amendments to the UK Corporate Governance Code later in the coming trade year. However, the necessary draft secondary legislation is to be provided before Parliament before March the year 2018, and the Government has made a promise that it will offer a series of consultation programs on the detail of this secondary legislation. The primary target of this innovation is to have the companies apply an appropriate mechanism in the execution of their activities. Additionally, the government intends to commence the work on developing voluntary corporate governance principles for large private companies in this autumn. Therefore, it is concluded that the current intention of the program is to bring the indicated reforms into the application by the month of June 2018. The companies will then have to start implementing these policies in the reporting years beginning on or after the provided date.

Conclusion

The provision of these changes in corporate governance is of significant impact to the region’s economy. The various person in companies is viewed as beneficiaries as they are enjoying a series of benefits from these programs. The companies are further employing specific directives on the process of registering improvement in the activities that they are offering to the public. Nevertheless, the majority of these changes can be made in the annual general meetings which involve all person of the company. Additionally, the concept has also created a platform where all involved person in a company’s operation can offer adjustments in the duties that are being executed in the company. Similarly, the majority of these activities are linked to the UK code of corporate governance. The Code further includes a provision that is requiring these companies to make an explanation on what set of actions they expect to take in reaction to the instances where a momentous percentage of ballots have been cast in contradiction of determination at any general meeting.



References

Blackburn, W. R., 2012. The sustainability handbook: [the complete management guide to achieving social, economic and environmental responsibility]. 1st ed. London: Earthscan. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=LyRRCwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+sustainability+handbook:+%5Bthe+complete+management+guide+to+achieving+social,+economic+and+environmental+responsibility&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwigor20wsvXAhWBWRoKHa9rCSIQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=The%20sustainability%20handbook%3A%20%5Bthe%20complete%20management%20guide%20to%20achieving%20social%2C%20economic%20and%20environmental%20responsibility&f=false

Brölmann, C. & Radi, Y., 2016. Research handbook on the theory and practice of international law-making. 1st ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=6ArxCwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Research+handbook+on+the+theory+and+practice+of+international+lawmakin&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwih_bfGwsvXAhXKExoKHTlNAssQ6AEILjAB#v=onepage&q=Research%20handbook%20on%20the%20theory%20and%20practice%20of%20international%20lawmakin&f=false

Clarke, T., Branson, D. & Publications. S., 2012. The SAGE handbook of corporate governance. 1st ed. London: SAGE. Retrieved from: http://www.worldcat.org/title/sage-handbook-of-corporate-governance/oclc/1004931290

Colino, S. M. & Furse, M., 2011. Competition law of the EU and UK. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=uuMjrdSWwKUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Competition+law+of+the+EU+and+UK&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjh2trdwsvXAhUBfhoKHUkEC5oQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=Competition%20law%20of%20the%20EU%20and%20UK&f=false

Mallin, C., 2016. Corporate governance. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: http://www.worldcat.org/title/corporate-governance/oclc/1000477358

Plessis, J. J. D. & Low, C. K., 2017. Corporate governance codes for the 21st century: International perspectives and critical analyses. 1st ed. Cham: Springer. Retrieved from: http://www.worldcat.org/title/corporate-governance-codes-for-the-21st-century-international-perspectives-and-critical-analyses/oclc/983466004

Sandoval, M., 2014. From Corporate to Social Media: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in Media and Communication Industries. 1st Ed. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from; https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=RZD8AgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=From+Corporate+to+Social+Media:+Critical+Perspectives+on+Corporate+Social+Responsibility+in+Media+and+Communication+Industries&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwibuafzwsvXAhXHAxoKHT3pB4IQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=From%20Corporate%20to%20Social%20Media%3A%20Critical%20Perspectives%20on%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility%20in%20Media%20and%20Communication%20Industries&f=false

Sheehan, K. M., 2012. Regulation of executive compensation: greed, accountability and say on pay. 1st ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub. Retrieved from: http://www.worldcat.org/title/regulation-of-executive-compensation-greed-accountability-and-say-on-pay/oclc/812529253

Susan Rose-Ackerman, S. E. J. F., 2015. Due Process of Law-making. 1st Ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from: https://books.google.co.ke/books?id=-_9DBgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Due+Process+of+Lawmaking&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjzhLaJw8vXAhUMfxoKHXEtDbgQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=Due%20Process%20of%20Lawmaking&f=false

Thomas, R. S. & Hill, J. G., 2012. Research handbook on executive pay. 1st ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub. Retrieved from: http://www.worldcat.org/title/research-handbook-on-executive-pay/oclc/779455073