When we discuss intellectual honesty
we are referring to how we gather, evaluate, and communicate ideas that have been derived from other people. Without significantly changing the framework, intellectual honesty depends on the truth. Academicians frequently work to advocate viewpoints that are similar to those of their sponsors, including the government and other organizations that provide them with money. Regrettably, our educational system also seeks to steer us in the same directions (Ball & Willson, 2012). Politics can sometimes exert pressure on juries, leading them to make poor decisions. But, in order to identify the real authors of such quotations, the case, the proper citation, and the accreditation must be included (Mooney, 2011). This paper examines the importance of intellectual honesty as follows.
Firstly, intellectual honesty makes works judgments easier and plausible
A more complicated issue brings much murkier to the facts hence making the arguments flawed and inappropriate. Our current world is popular for people, including elites and intellectuals minds, normally have the urge to follow incentives rather than pursuing the ideals process (McCabe, & Pavela, 2010). It will be very significant for us to protect the intellectual property and avoid the risk of omitting facts that hold the weight of our arguments.
Secondly, it is very crucial to cite authors appropriately
because it shows the reader the depth and accuracy of the research you have conducted in accomplishing the task (Bornmann & Daneil, 2008). Besides, correct citation shows a sense of irresponsibility and acknowledging authors' ideas and efforts. Lastly, the honesty in citing assists readers in tracking down the sources in the references list as well as avoiding plagiarism.
In summary, the virtue of intellectual honesty helps in systematic analysis, dissemination, and distribution of the acquired ideas by recognizing the original author.
As mentioned above, the act reduces flaws in the decision made by presenting organized and accountable facts (Bornmann & Daneil, 2008; Case, & Higgins, 2009). The common signs of intellectual honesty are making work easier, understandable and plausible among much more.
References
Ball, D.L., & Wilson, S.M. (2012). Integrity in teaching: Recognizing the fusion of the moral and intellectual. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 155-192.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
Case, D.O., & Higgins, G.M. (2009). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 51(7), 635-645.
McCabe, D.L., & Pavela, G. (2010). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity: How faculty can foster student honesty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(3), 10-15.
Mooney, H. (2011). Citing data sources in the social sciences: do authors do it?. Learned Publishing, 24(2), 99-108.
