1. Revenues and Price Competitive Positioning:
Pandora initial model was membership based with free hours upon initial registration. Later they changed to free model while keeping the membership display optional for those in need of more music and ad free accounts. Apart from its mainstream source, Pandora radio earns additional revenue from the referrals to its accomplice online stores, Apple and Amazon. The resultant indirect income from referrals are meager and do not constitute a significant source of Pandora’s income. Advertising is a significant revenue generator for Pandora and contributes 93% of its aggregate income (Dennis). The organization has a broad database of its clients, including data, for example, sexual orientation, age, and postal district of the client. It can likewise provide information on client's music inclinations and spilling history. The music inclination is essential in generating advertisements that are precise and match the users' preferences.
2. User Acquisition
Viral development: The Company depends on viral growth for its advertising. As of to date, this technique is very fruitful, and client stations are developing at comparative rate 10,000 units per day. The mainstream application at the moment for new users’ registrations is Facebook (Arditi 418).
3. Costs
The fixed overhead cost for Pandora incorporates innovation, overhead, and Genome Project activities. Aside from the settled expenses, there are three other variable costs. Pandora needs to pay sovereignties in view of organization's incomes. The company has to pay 4% of its earned revenue to The American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) and Broadcast Music, Inc (BMI) to compensate the songwriter, streaming cost and other revenue-based commissions (Goldspink 76).
Their business plan is generating positive cash flow; the organization has not yet watched a profitable quarter. They have 16 million clients and 65 million stations.
The membership display is not filling in as foreseen and clients are stopping in the wake of utilizing the free hours.
Just 60% of the available advertisement space is used given that promotions are the significant wellspring of income for Pandora. It is uncertain how to structure and value the membership show.
In the interim, their variable expenses are very high which brings about unbeneficial clients.
Q2. Potential Solutions to the Problems Identified
The conceivable alternatives for Pandora for their high utilization clients, as specified for the situation may be:
i. Increase in promoting
ii. Go in for the "Freemium" idea
iii. Implement a membership demonstrate
iv. Cap the listening hours by charging clients a settled sum for surpassing a specific breaking point
The „Cost to Serve‟ is bigger than the extent of settled cost. In such an industry, the significance of CRM and regarding clients as they merit is highlighted. We should in this way center around tending to the issue of managing the clients that are right now unrewarding for Pandora.
Weighing the Options
Pandora should include even more aggressive publicizing as long as it is effective. Pandora can use on the way that they can give focused on publicizing given the data gathered from their clients. Right now, just 60 % of their publicizing space is being used; thus, Pandora has a considerable measure of the extent of expanding its incomes by essentially putting more visual commercials. The accomplishment of the iPhone Application of Pandora is another purpose behind laying more weight on promoting as this has prompted a huge increment in client base giving more alternatives to sponsors to achieve shoppers more precisely and imaginatively. Pandora ought to keep up their strategy of not embeddings sound advertisements as doing as it would ruin the client encounter.
The "Freemium" model of offering Pandora’s benefit is a decent alternative to gain incomes from clients. Nonetheless, this cannot be connected to the present administration level alone as the clients who are accustomed to getting their administration for nothing will not pay for a similar level of administration. Specific increases must be done to the present administration offering of Pandora if this model must be connected.
Develop a membership show: Asking for a membership expense from all clients for utilizing Pandora's administrations exhibit the benefits of spreading the arising costs on the vast client subscriptions thus bringing down the overhead cost per client which can be efficiently paid by them. In any case, this again prompts the issue of delay concerning the clients to pay up for administrations that they have accustomed to get free. Despite the fact that this approach may appear to be reasonable, as clients would pay for gushing the music, however, risks are that many clients would permanently quit utilizing the administrations as has been the experience of Pandora.
Topping the listening hours: The clients who tune in to Pandora unnecessarily are additionally unfruitful. The clients who did not need to pay for gushing the radio left it on even while they were far from their PCs creating no incomes, as they did not play out any movement on their PCs and producing spilling costs for Pandora. In this manner, to debilitate such use, the top of 40 hours of free use every month and after that charging a small measure of 99 pennies for additionally utilize appears like a decent technique. The settled small installment sum would likewise not bring about negative Word of Mouth. We have just observed that a little top of 10 hours did not function admirably for Pandora. Despite the fact that this is a conventional methodology, it is yet not entirely secure as clients may pay the extra 99 pennies and still stay "Flawed Faucets" by utilizing the administration too much with no movement for over 80 hours every month. The methodology can take care of the present issue looked by Pandora to a substantial degree.
Q3. Analyzing the Data Present in the Pandora.
Quantitate Analysis
From Exhibit 3, we can evaluate the breakeven situation with the current scenario.
The Average contribution from a user/hour = Average ad revenue per listener per hour-Total Variable Cost
The Average user hours per day = 2.5 (From Exhibit 3)
The Average user contribution per day =
Current fixed costs =
Fixed costs/ day = $0.0603 million
Thus, from the above quantitative analysis, the breakeven point would be achieved at:
0.0603/0.009= 6.7 million users
From the figures obtained, proceeding with a similar plan of action, a similar use design by the clients, the organization can just breakeven if the number of users going to the site turns out to be about fourfold to 6.7 million from the current 1.8 million. This development is immense, and subsequently, the company cannot proceed with the present plan of action.
Since the administration is taking a gander at charging the clients having over 40 hours of utilization, it is expected that for clients having over 40 hours of use, there is not adequate movement on the screen and their commitment winds up negative. Consequently, for an hour over 40, the cost stays in place yet the income produced through promotions is zero. Along these lines, in the exceed expectations sheet (Appendix 1) the contrary commitment that can be ascertained if the company restrains the hours of use to 40, and in this manner a definite commitment created. Add up to negative commitment dispensed with/month if hours of free utilization decreased to 40 = $1.39 million.
Positive commitment produced per annum with this move= $1.39×12= $16.67 million since the current commitment from clients is 0.009×1.8×365= $5.913 million
On the off chance that the company controls the listening hours to 40, the aggregate commitment will move toward becoming $22.583 million, which will make the organization breakeven with the present number of clients.
In any case, checking the number of hours may turn a piece of the users’ base away, however, when the natural development in next couple of months adjusts for the number of individuals who have left, the organization will breakeven.
If the organization chooses to take $0.99 from clients over 40 hours of use, then the measure of application that can be permitted with it. Let us compute the ideal Y number of hours at which the organization can check the utilization Optimum Y would be the point at which the positive commitment by accepting this $0.99 is disintegrated by the negative commitment of the clients (no action following 40 hours use)
0.0258×(Y-40) =0.99
Y= 78.3
Form the calculations above, the company would earn more if it would take $0.99 from users listening more than 80 hours in a month. The contribution margin of the dormant clients is almost zero, but to avoid negative publicity, it would not be ideal to remove such idle accounts. Subsequently, embracing the indirect and unilateral methodology of cost escalation. By doing this, we increment the cost of getting to our administrations for the clients who were unrewarding for us, without influencing the individuals who positively affected our edges. Besides, the clients that do choose to bring about the extra value ascend for the administration will take care of the incremental expense (Castle, Basheer, and Lexton 255).
Q4. Develop and Communicate your Recommendation for Specific Action that Should be Undertaken by Pandora.
Pandora radio should undertake some additional precautions to guarantee that the "Broken Faucets" are stopped.
Pandora must endeavor to use its publicized stock better to earn more incomes by focusing on ads both on the web and on their iPhone application.
Pandora should charge the client’s 99 cents for promoting their model. Nevertheless, this would not be for boundless utilization and would be restricted to 80 hours for each month use. The clients utilizing the radio for over 80 hours are probably going to be dormant for long periods, along these lines bringing about an expanding expense to the organization. The point in this manner ought to be to limit the quantity of clients going past 40 hours of tuning in. Accordingly, Pandora should offer a higher cost of $3 for utilization over 80 hours to cover the losses (Pack 38-39).
Clients who need to use Pandora for more than 80 hours a month would be given the offer of buying into the Pandora Premium administration by paying $3 every month. These clients would have the capacity to appreciate better nature of music streaming at high speeds so that there is no buffering time and they can enjoy constant music. The buffering ought to be the way that Pandora can dispatch their "Freemium" show. The Premium clients can likewise be offered different administrations like fewer promotions. Consequently, by enhancing the customers‟ music use and by offering boundless access, Pandora can plug the "Flawed Faucets" and in the meantime create incomes from them for more general use (Lane 462).
Another critical advance that should be taken to unravel the "Defective Faucet" issue is to have benefit timeouts on the administration if there is dormancy for more than one hour to guarantee that clients do not leave the PCs and stay active on Pandora thus, creating incomes from ads (Jengchung 56). For the Premium clients, the latency benefit timeout length would be 5 hours. Accepting, that these clients produce income just for the initial 40 hours of utilization and after that wind up inert, the $3 installment takes care of their variable expense for a further 110 hours, i.e., an aggregate of 150 hours per month. The 5-hour latency benefit timeout would guarantee that the clients do not stay dormant for over 5 hours at a time and regardless of whether the customers take after such utilization design, they would utilize Pandora for 150 hours every month (Gonsalves 20)
Q5. Do Companies such as Pandora have a duty to Behave in a Socially Responsible Manner? If Pandora's Duty Extends Beyond Adherence to the Law and Earning a Profit, what (in your Opinion) is that Duty?
Pandora makes the services accessible in specific purviews universally, including the United States, Australia, and New Zealand, and the regions of the prior nations (each, an "Approved Jurisdiction," and on the whole, the "Approved Jurisdictions"). While offering their services to such jurisdictions, Pandora radio has to behave in a socially responsible manner. The distributions of digital media are subject to age restrictions. The social norm speculates that all adult content being distributed should be rated under Parental Guidance Act. Utilization of the services outside of the authorized jurisdictions is entirely restricted, outside the extent of the permit allowed in this, and if abused, it may be subject a company such as Pandora Radio to legal battles with the affected jurisdictions (Chen 13).
The Pandora code of ethics stipulates ethical aspirations that guide the company moral expectation concerning the people’s behavior. The Code of Ethics covers areas such as human rights, which applies to both the registered users and Pandora’s radio employees, conducive working conditions for their employees, safeguarding the environment, adhering to the accepted legislative laws and maintaining a healthy relationship with the artists. Pandora enhances ethical policies through the use of a code of conduct to their employees. The company code of conduct governs music acquisition rights from the artists, creating awareness of its module available to the users through print advertisements or user manuals and adhering to the accepted code of conduct (applies to the management and employees (Morris 427).
Q6. Cultural Issues that Pandora Should Consider While Operating in a Global Environment
In the past decades, the use of digital technology has changed the cultural way of life in many areas. Today, globalization has turned into a reality. Technological advancement and liberalization in the trade have made it possible for companies to operate globally. Pandora radio has its operations in more than one country. This mode of operation has enabled different personnel from the company to operate together. The expansion by Pandora to other markets can be seen as lucrative, but running a company in a global environment is a lot challenging than managing a local company. The global factors that affect Pandora operations are different legal and political, social and economic environments. Pandora Radio is in the music industry, and there are cultural issues that it should take into account while operating in a global environment.
Cultural Framework for Sustainable Development
Pandora radio should consider implementing a Cultural framework while expanding in another global environment. Pandora should ensure that it actively involves the masses through direct employment of the locals so that they can understand the market needs and areas they should pay close attention so as they gain a competitive edge. There are specific logistics that the company has to take a look at by the mere fact of it being a global company. Pandora employees should ensure that the information they share both within and outside the company is accurate and reflect the company’s commitment as a global player in the internet radio segment. The company should always bring to attention any intent of falsifying digital records by artists. Pandora should control the visibility of the music from one global market to another depending on applicable legislative requirement. By adhering to the cultural frameworks appropriate in different areas, Pandora would be seen as acting on protecting cultural diversity of its regional countries of operation.
Compliance with Policies.
While using copyrighted music from artists, every radio company playing that music to its listeners such as Pandora radio has to conform with the rules and compliance policies applying to the music industry (Ritala 40). The USA has two music licensing bodies that Pandora has to pay to avail the music to its subscribers, the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) and Broadcast Music, Inc (BMI). Other global markets that Pandora radio operate in also have bodies that license the artist's music. Pandora might secure and keep up private and exclusive data in strict certainty, except when the organization approves divulgence or the law requires the company to avail user information for investigative purposes. The utilization or divulgence of this data is for organization purposes only and not for individual advantage or the advantage of others. In order to protect user privacy, exposure and exchange of restrictive or aggressive data ought to be constrained to the employees with consensual knowledge of the information.
The confidential and proprietary information that Pandora radio in its operations as a global market player should take into account include;
i. the non-public data that may be helpful to contenders or that could be destructive to the organization or its clients or merchants if revealed;
ii. the intellectual property which includes patents, trademarks, trade secrets patents and copyrights, as well as business, research and new product plans.
iii. information concerning employees, listeners, advertisers, OEMs, artists, record labels or stockholders.
Pandora radio has to meet the regulations of accepted operational standard and thus avoid legal suits. proprietary losses and negative publicity that may arise by disclosing confidential user information (Anthony 61).
Works Cited
Anthony, Luke. "Seven Key Steps to Licensing Music for Digital Exploitation." Entertainment
Law Review 24.2 (2013): 61-63. Print.
Arditi, David. "iTunes: Breaking Barriers and Building Walls." Popular Music and Society37.4 (2013):
408-424. Web.
Castle, Christian, Tahir Basheer, and Charlie Lexton. "Chapter 3.6: Digital Licensing Challenges: A
Discussion Between Content Providers & Dsps." Licensing of Music - From BC To AD (Before the Change / After Digital) - IAEL 2014. Adrienn Karancsi and James M. Kendrick. 1st ed. London: FRUKT Source, 2014. 254-257. Print.
Chen, R. Finding A Partner Model with Broadcasters at Tunein.Com. Stanford: Case Publisher,
2011. Web.
Goldspink, Justin. "Chapter 2.1: The Streaming Royalty Controversy." The Streaming Revolution In
The Entertainment Industry - IAEL 2015. Marcelo Goyanes and Jeff Liebenson. 1st ed. London: FRUKT Source, 2015. 72-83. Print.
Gonsalves, Andrew K. "Music Licensing - Digital Music Distribution." The Licensing Journal35.3
(2015): 20-22. Print.
Lane, Mary Ann. ""Interactive Services" And the Future of Internet Radio
Broadcasts." Alabama Law Review 62.2 (2011): 459-476. Print.
Morris, Melissa L. "How Streaming Audio and Video Change the Playing Field for Copyright
Claims." Journal of Law and Policy 18.1 (2010): 419-457. Print.
Pack, Thomas. "Pandora Lets Users Create Online Radio Stations." Information Today 25.5 (2008):
38-39. Print.
Ritala, Sofia. "Pandora & Spotify: Legal Issues and Licensing Requirements for Interactive And
Non-Interactive Internet Radio Broadcasters." Idea (Concord, N.H.) 54.1 (2014): 23-53. Print.
