Discussion about the change in global
Discussion about the change in global is formed by the knowledge groupings developed to discourse both capitalism and globalization.\u00a0 While the modern technology advances, humans also seem to evolve and acquire great geological force.\u00a0 Until recently, climate change had been associated with human activities. Human actions have been considered to exert a geological force that changes the climate of the whole globe. However according to Dipesh Chakrabarty, environment change in only the exhibition of how humankind varies and the influence on the earth system (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). It is Anthropocene that raises problematic questions of distributive impartiality between developed, underdeveloped countries and also between the rich and the poor.\u00a0 It poses a lot of challenges on the traditions of political thoughts, and it has caused different thoughts about humans on diverse measures and also in different settings.\u00a0 This can be in the context of the global commercial system and as a member of an inferior kinds.<\/p>
Sex difference in children’s toy preference
Sex difference in children\u2019s toy preference is a study that has been carried out by many researchers who aimed to know the real truth behind the perception and behavior of transgendered children (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). This preference can, however, be known through gender socialization and can be observed when the children are engaging in play activities. During early years children learn many things through social interaction, it is during this years that they also come to identify their gender and learns more about gender difference. Often children play in groups of the gender they identify themselves with and finds it pleasurable (Kahle and King 2018, p. 310). Children at the age from 9 months old play with the toys specific to their danger. Children follow different development stages concerning the selection of gender-typed toys.<\/p>
A case study on toy preference in children
A case study was carried out on 12 children to examine their preference of toys during play. Among the children, there were l5 males four female and three transgendered children. The focus, however, was to find out how different genders prefer certain toys. The children were released for play activities every mid-day after their first two lessons of learning in the morning. It was observed that the Boys favor construction and transport toys whereas for girls they prefer toys such as dolls and the transgendered children seemed to get interested in the toys of opposite sex they are identified (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). Boys are more active, and they tend to engage in rough play than girls, for the children with the two-sex system which are identified as males they engage in play activities with girls and could resist playing with boys. This can be concluded that the biological factors influence the sex difference in aspects related to playing behavior (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). The two-sex system is problematic in different ways, in that it affects a child social interaction and the child will tend to grow up identifying himself or herself with the opposite sex.\u00a0 This effect can be transferred to late years of the child when he or she will recognize the real gender (Kahle and King 2018, p. 310). Children learn from the things that happen within the environment; this makes countering gender socialization difficult<\/p>
Society's perception and support for transgender children
Society has contributed much to the insecurity of such children; this is because society has a bad perception of and often regarded as evil (Hyde et al 2018, p. 231). They face discrimination based on their gender identity however people should understand that transgender issues are caused by biological process and learn to perceive it as normal.\u00a0 They should be respected like other normal children. Parents should offer their full support to such children, especially during the early years (Hyde et al 2018, p. 231). In the play the parents should ensure that the children get the suitable toys, the toys they are interested. If there is any need for making them aware of their gender, it should be done at an appropriate age (Kahle and King 2018, p. 310). Their decision with the gender they want to associate themselves with should be respected, this will help the child confidence and will not affect him like the criticism that he or she can get from the society, and they even get insulted and intimidation.<\/p>
Impact of upbringing and societal perception on transgender children
The environment in which the two system children are brought up contributes to who he or she identify herself. Since such children are antisocial, they should be assisted by their parents or caregivers to understand that they are not different from others (Kearney 2017, p. 75).\u00a0 Each of them should also ensure that they play his or her roles properly to give support to the gender they belong for the child to know the roles of the gender that they identify themselves. Another problem is the inferiority that such children develop to have, this is because realizing that they are not biologically the same with other makes them feel intimidated. Some of the parents, however, feel that their children should alter their bodies through a medical intervention such as surgery or hormonal therapy nut the process is so expensive, and it is not affordable to many people (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). Such parents often feel uneasy of people in the society who knows that their child is the two-sex system.<\/p>
Fighting for the rights of transgender children
Some programs and association have however come out to fight for the rights of such children even in schools where they are ensured that they are not insulted by others rather they can engage well with others during play (Kearney 2017, p. 75).\u00a0 We, therefore, can say that sex and gender are closely linked, in that gender is determined by the type of sex of an individual. Gender is the main focus of the society on the life of an individual; this is because it deals with the expectation of people from society (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). This is to act in a certain way. It is therefore normal when a person has one type of sex system since it is easy for him or her to identify is gender and allow for good socialization<\/p>
Question Two: Climate Change
Indeed Dipesh has argued well, and I believe that the human-induced climate change cannot be reduced to a story of capitalism. First, the two situations are quite different in that environment is a natural resource that needs to be preserved since its supports life of all living things Capitalism, however, is artificial and can be managed if it causes disasters and there is a need to save (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). Otherwise, it doesn’t fully put the life of humans into danger. Whenever there is climate change, all human beings experience it and there no one is left out unlike in the case of capitalism where it produces a gap between the rich and the poor.\u00a0 It is through a good environment that people can get enough food and growing environment can be sustained (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). The struggle to combat climate change can bring out the both best and worst of capitalism is all about innovation, and it has been overgrowing in developing countries and has brought about the other alternatives that can be used. This has left most of the people arguing that capitalism will solve climate change catastrophe because green technologies are becoming cheaper. Such people fail to understand that all types of innovation have one goal that is the target of making profits. Capitalists’ economies can produce new energy system and energy efficient technologies, they also produce new technologies of consuming energy, and they are making it cheaper.<\/p>
The dangerous side of innovation and capitalism
Human is endlessly creative, and it seems that every day the technology is advancing and innovation being higher. What is worrying is how the capitalist seems not be seeing the dangerous part of innovation, they do not think of future that is beyond here and now.\u00a0\u00a0 They only mind of their big corporation, making profits but do not care about the damage that their corporation cause to the ecosystem (Laoire 2017, p. 112). They only aimed at maximizing the profits without any interference from the politicians even if the aim is to solve that climate change crisis. Capitalist to an extent seems to be superior, and it is dominating and making other people inferior and weak to even protect the environment (Laoire 2017, p. 112). They are however playing their role as capitalist in the economy to contribute to the growth of GDP; this causes the government only to take risks to manage climate change that does not disrupt wealth accumulation.\u00a0<\/p>
The role of capitalism in solving the climate crisis
This can explain the reason why most of the capitalist countries have not taken into account to reduce the carbon emission in industries.\u00a0 Some scholars have referred to it has creative destruction, the way in which inefficient producers carries the business through disruptive technologies which lead to the negative transformation of climate (Hyde et al 2018, p. 231). Their capitalism, however, plays a big role in solving the climate crisis. This is because such a crisis can be expensive and cannot be solved with poverty. Capitalism is indeed a new system, and some of the systems are more prominent and it needs the government to intervene (Chakrabarty 2017, p. 35). However the system can be too much destructive as it can cause climate change crisis, this, therefore, means that the capitalist needs to properly integrate into the ecosphere so that its effects on the growth of subsystem will not be missed.\u00a0 This is because some of the economists have a misconception that ecosphere is part of the economy and they get confused on the estimation of natural capital.<\/p>
Combating human-induced climate change
Despite all the aims that the new technology is attempting on capitalism, there is no quick change recorded about the positive impacts it has caused on the environment. An example is a decarbonization which is a great experience, and it is causing global warming which will not end soon. However human activities have also contributed much too environmental challenges that have led to climate change, this can only be linked to poverty and ignorance on the need to keep the environment. Human impacts that cause climate change can only be solved by government and creating awareness to the ignorant people.\u00a0<\/p>
Reference
Chakrabarty, D., 2017. The politics of climate change is more than the politics of capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2-3), pp.25-37.
Hyde, J.S., Bigler, R.S., Joel, D., Tate, C.C. and van Anders, S.M., 2018. The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist.
Kahle, L.L., Rosenbaum, J. and King, S., 2018. Examining the Intersections of Gender and Sexual Orientation within the Discipline: A Case for Feminist and Queer Criminology.The Handbook of Race, Ethnicity, Crime, and Justice, pp.303-325.
Kearney, M.C., 2017. Gender and Rock. Oxford University Press.
Laoire, L.Ó., 2017. Murder in a Meadow: Environmental and Cultural Extinction in Cathal Ó Searcaigh's" Scrúdú Coinsiasa Roimh Dhul Chun Suain". Nature, Culture & Literature, 13.
