According to John Locke, a Conjugal Society
John Locke’s concept of conjugal society adds a new dimension to the concept of conjugal partnerships. The same holds true for marriage, relationships, and even companionship. According to the author, the two pillars of a marital society are the man and the woman, and the association is entirely voluntary. Individually, the inclusion of additional components of the family, rather than just the man and the woman, suggests the term “society.” Locke is correct in asserting that the conjugal society entails a form of communion. Locke supports this notion by emphasizing the principle of volition that is the communion is deliberate. However, what makes this argument more interesting and intriguing is the idea that conjugal society goes beyond mere companionship. It presents privileges and responsibilities as well. The right to another’s body is a provision of this communion. Nevertheless, the same comes with the responsibility of procreation, and the need to enhance posterity and continuity.
Inclusivity and Exclusivity in Conjugal Society
Besides, it is interesting how these aspects of conjugal society intertwine into a complex web of both exclusivity and inclusivity, and this is paradoxical. For example, the responsibility to procreate is inclusive of both external and internal factors. The right to another’s body is entirely exclusive and is only practicable between a man and a woman. Nonetheless, the results of the act of procreation which are the offspring must be nourished, and this is the responsibility of the man and the woman collectively and is the right of the offspring on the other hand. The particular assertion can be justified by the given quote, “, but necessary to their common offspring, who have a Right…” Finally, it is evident that according to John Locke a conjugal society is formed on the basis of mutual understanding, assistance and support with the ultimate goal of procreation in mind.
