Shakespeare’s Ibsen’s “Doll House” and othello

The human condition is a difficult thing to comprehend. Although some people consider the morality of an act to be immoral, others could potentially see it as positive. This is the case of Nora, the main character in A Doll of the House of Appointment. Leaving her children is considered derogatory by others. Others, however, see it as a liberating gesture in which Nora can actually discover her true self. Although the main character of A Doll Links House has strong reasons for her actions, the same can be said for people in Othello Links. It has been shown that human nature can rely on one motive and purpose. In the case of Othello, it showed that sometimes, people just manipulate others for their own gain. One of the characters acted as if he was acting in good faith, but has secretly been manipulating things for his advantage. The stories of “Othello” and “A Doll’s House” showed that the human condition is complicated and one cannot judge a person right away because motivation and intention is not always revealed. Both plays have made a big impact on how people may understand the human condition. It is not always black and white. One cannot judge an act as good or bad without looking deep into the reasons and origin of such. Sometimes, conflict can arise because there are things that people suppress. In case of “A Doll’s House”, Nora kept to herself the feeling of being treated like a plaything. For “Othello”, Iago hid his true intentions in order to manipulate other characters and fulfill his plans. The artistic expression of such human condition was carefully presented in both plays, as it was portrayed in such a way that people may actually feel or do. It showed the universal truth, regarding the gray areas of morality and the meaning of life.