A manager and leader
A manager and leader are necessary for a successful corporate organization. This demonstrates that the two names refer to two distinct jobs within any one organization. Each has a responsibility and a lane to stay in. Since they perform the same functions, the two names are sometimes confused. They are both essential elements of any given organization, yet they each have a certain function to do (Kotterman, 2006). In any given organization, the setting of this study is to analyze and evaluate the contrasts between the two positions.
Members of the corporate organization
Members of the corporate organization who have been given the responsibilities and authority to perform four essential functions in any given body namely; Planning, Organizing, Leading as well as Controlling. Some managers have the qualities of a good leader in the sense that they are involved in activities that aim at encouraging the employees as well as providing instances of inspiration to help motivate the workers' hence better organization performance. However not all managers are leaders thus sparking up the debate whether leaders are made or born.
Leaders vs Managers
Leaders distinguish themselves from the managers in the sense that they do not have to hold an office. Consequently, this implies that a leader does not represent a figure of authority in the given organization since anyone can be a leader. In comparison to the managers, leaders are more influential in the sense that they attract masses and crowds as a result of their personal beliefs as well as behavior. Unlike managers, a leader invests his time and resources on projects that stand for a dedication in the line of work per their passion.
Visions and Goals
Leaders come up with visions while on the other hand; the managers create and set goals for the organization. Concerning coming up with ideas, leaders are more elaborate in painting a picture of what the future will be. It then the work of the manager is to come with the various strategies to help see the vision turn into a reality. If the leader does not have an agenda, the manager is deemed to achieve less or nothing in the organization. Regarding goals set as the various steps followed to attain a specific vision.
Agents of Change
Leaders are known to be the agents of change in that they will change their stands depending on the situation hence having real quick decision-making processes. On the other hand, managers work towards achieving and maintaining the status quo (Stanley, 2006). In regards, leaders are unique hence keep on inventing new ideas in the ever-changing world. However, managers copy regarding the strategies and theories to apply at work moistly by verified scholars or other businesspeople and managers.
Distinguishing Functions
In conclusion, it is evident that managers and leaders have a significant disparity ranging from duties as well as their way of work. It is the high time their various functions are distinguished such as a manager can hire and fire while a leader provides recommendations or guidance.
References
Kotterman, J. (2006). Leadership versus management: what’s the difference?. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 29(2), 13.
Stanley, D. (2006). Role conflict: leaders and managers: David Stanley reviews the literature, and discusses his own research, on the difference between leadership and management. Nursing Management (Harrow), 13(5), 31-38.
