Gun Control in America
Senate Bill 11 which was put into effect in the year 2016, on August permits students from 21 years to have a licensed firearm and similarly possess them while in colleges. Thus, controversies have been rising concerning gun control in America. Proponents of a firearm control laws believer that such laws lead to vicious crimes in America and should be changed make is more comfortable any USA citizens to buy a handgun, carry it just like a concealed arsenal then subsequently use it for protection when the need arises. However, there are a bunch of people who consider that gun laws results to much violence in the country and there is need to amend them in order to make it hard in acquiring a gun. Thus, people owning illegal firearms should be sent to jail. The paper is an annotated bibliography on gun control in America.
Hayes, D., 2013. Why This Gun Control Debate Has Been Different. Wonkblog, http:\/\/www. washingtonpost. com\/blogs\/wonkblog\/wp\/2013\/01\/28\/whythis-gun-control-debate-has-been-different.
Hayes (2013) of this article investigates the question as to why the preset drive for the control of gun in the USA historically has been more prevalent as compared to any other nation. The author offers past statistics of mass shootings as well as correspondence to media reporting they attracted. He describes various ways in which there exists a form of spiking media consideration just following the mass shooting alongside the duration such process lasted. The author believes that since there lived numerous successive shots made the issue to appeal to the media from all corners of the nation. Unlike mass firings which happened for the past periods, which were incredibly unprompted and extensively covered several parts, the government felt pressurized to take stern actions for the perpetrators of the heinous act.
From the study, it is incredibly essential to establish as to why there was an occurrence of several mass shootings within a shorter duration. Hayes (2013) similarly outlined the motives behind sterner gun control regulations. The article's information comes into the limelight as the writer investigates mass shooting history in America alongside the reactions of media towards such acts. In recap, one is capable of relating coverage frequency on matters which result in the interests spiking concerns on the underlying topics that sequentially brings about a more significant push in support of new-fangled and stringent laws on gun control.
Ludwig, J., 2017. Reducing gun violence in America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(46), pp.12097-12099.
Gun violence rate in American society considerably surpasses that of several nations, which are in the category of developed calibers. The author, notes that in the USA. Deaths arising from guns—mainly homicides—leads to life expectancy disparities between minority groups and whites. The scientific development when it comes to comprehending ways on how to solve such problem is blamed on the limited research funding to establish the causes of the problem. The issue of the financing is mainly attributable to politics surrounding gun control in America. For that matter, Ludwig (2017) in his article proposes firearm control as a measure of reducing violence in the USA.
In the article, Ludwig (2017) argues that adopting compulsory waiting duration in the process of purchasing handgun decreases gun homicides with approximately 17%. These projected results are enormous. The outstanding effect of all indeed is intervention policy which steers to gun violence reductions would appear to inflict few detriments to the communities. The analysis the used in the article similarly breeds various follow-up queries which must be answered aptly by the lawmakers in the USA. That id at all gun laws are useful, then why should only 16 states in America be the only ones implementing them. Primarily, the author seems to provide at the end of the piece on what he purports to be known as "collective action crisis" which results to a small but incredibly inspired minority within a particular population with the intention of dominating the process of legislative. Ludwig (2017) processes that stringent rules on gun control should be enacted to reduce gun violence.
Wasserman, L.M., 2011. Gun control on college and university campuses in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago. Va. J. Soc. Pol'y \\" L., 19, p.1
The article develops standards to steer officials of colleges and universities in their pursuit of fulfilling their strategic objectives, whereas staying devoted towards peoples' Second Amendment obligation of possessing firearms. The qualitative research is done (Wasserman 2011) presents observations on parts where campus officials have the right of securing the enactment gun control within the colleges and Universities.
The article provides illustration of McDonald versus Chicago city of the year 2010. Here, the Supreme Court made a declaration that the Second Amendment was be integrated into subsequent section Fourteenth Amendment, and thus applicable contrary to other states' laws (Wasserman 2011). The section advocates for gun control in the country. The author notes that owing a gun by college going students is the reason why mass shootings happen in most learning institutions.
From the perspective of Wasserman 2011), state legislatures, university and college governing councils which approve the regulations of campus firearm shall be having little likelihood of infringing the Second Amendment liberty of citizens in keeping and having guns. It can happen particularly when they put into effect the presumptively legitimate constraints declared the court of law the case of McDonald and Heller. Most of the restrictions on presumptive regulations are those controlling murderers or persons who are mentally ill. The article documents various limits, which are put in place to avoid mass shooting in colleges and universities resulting from owning firearms in these institutions.
Conclusion
To sum it up, gun control in America is significant due to security motives. Handguns which are offered to civilians for the past periods have flickered a debate among people from all walks of life. Multiple discussions in the public domain are attributed to mass shootings which happened recently at Sandhook Elementary School. Subsequently, as from the three articles annotated, all the authors seem to point out grim adverse implications to come in future when measures of gun control are handled ineffectively. However, there are a group of people supporting obscured handguns alongside those opposing the move to have such guns. Therefore, as proposed by Ludwig (2017) in his article, strict measures should be put in place to reduce gun violence which has taken center stage in a country. Multiple public shootings for past period have been rampant in the USA. Laws and regulations aimed at averting these situations should be enacted to reestablish public confidence as well as circumvent future disasters.
References
Hayes, D., 2013. Why This Gun Control Debate Has Been Different. Wonkblog, http://www. washingtonpost. com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/28/whythis-gun-control-debate-has-been-different.
Ludwig, J., 2017. Reducing gun violence in America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(46), pp.12097-12099.
Wasserman, L.M., 2011. Gun control on college and university campuses in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago. Va. J. Soc. Pol'y " L., 19, p.1
