Nozick's Theory of Justice
Nozick’s theory of justice claims that, by examining its history, one can determine if goods have been distributed in a just way or not. Unlike, John Rawls theory of justice based on original agreements and structure of the society (Feibleman, 207), Nozick’s argument is historically based. The distribution of goods is only justified if the process used during acquiring and delivery of the products was legitimate (Green). If a legal method was not used, then a follow up has to be made to determine if the injustice was resolved basing on the third principle. From the follow-up, if it was fixed, the distribution is considered just. Otherwise, it is not just.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Nozick's Theory
Since the Nozick’s theory is based on one getting rewarded for their effort, the approach is fair to individuals since it prohibits oppression and the wealth acquired by one person does not have to be shared to the rest, which is a strength of the theory (Green). However, basing on this theory, the lower class, the unqualified and the disabled do not have a chance of getting better jobs nor even achieve improved financial gains. The shortcomings result in increased gaps between the economic classes. Also, the theory lacks a specific requirement of the principles stated hence it requires a foundation.
Critique of Nozick's Theory
Considering the flaws in Nozick’s theory against redistributive justice, I do not think this theory should be used in organizing a society. One major flaw is its significant lack of content. The use of Locke’s theory of property is inefficient as it lacks clarification on the principles of acquiring justice. An approach that deficiencies completion cannot be used to run a society. The theory’s argument against taxation is a source of difficulties and is also not sufficient enough.
Works Cited
Feibleman, James K. "A THEORY OF JUSTICE. By John Rawls. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971. $15.00." (1973): 198-205.Retrieved from:http://www.csus.edu/indiv/c/chalmersk/econ184sp09/johnrawls.pdf
Green Michael. “The entitlement theory of justice.” Social " Political Philosophy (2009). Retrieved from: http://carneades.pomona.edu/2009-SPP/nts-0413.shtml
