Social Theories
Social theories have proved to be vital in the contemporary society. In particular, social theories have attempted to explain patterns or human actions in societies such as why people act in the way they do, functions of certain institutions, as well as how and why societies change. Karl Marxist is one of the renowned social theorists who argued that society comprises of distinct classes and society can be understood through those classes (Crossman, 2018). Consequently, Karl Marxist established a well-known social theory referred to as the social conflict theory. In this perspective, it would be vital to discuss, analyze and provide justifications related to this famous theory.
Discussion of the Marxist Theory of Social Conflict
Marxist conflict theory views society as a competition for the limited resources available. This means that the society comprises of individuals from distinct social classes who are always in competition for social, political, as well as material resources, which include employment, food, and housing, as well as education (Crossman, 2018). In fact, the presence of social institutions such as religion, government, and education are reflections of the competition. The social institutions have played a significant role in maintaining the unequal social structure. In this regard, the social conflict theory as suggested by Karl Marxist claims that society is in the state of unending conflict as a result of ever-existing competition for limited resources. Consequently, the social order is maintained by those with power and control, rather than agreement and conformity. From the discussion, it is imperative to indicate that individuals with wealth and power in the society try to hold on it mainly by oppressing the powerless and the poor.
Analysis of Social Conflict Theory
From the highlighted discussion of the conflict theory, it is clear that the society is a complex system with imbalance. The imbalance possesses the capability to cause conflict, which can result in a social change in the society (Sidanius & Pratto, 2001). As the working class and poor are subjected to worsening conditions, their collective realization of their rights can bring the inequality to light and this can result to revolt. However, if the worsening conditions are adjusted to address the concerns, then the conflict can be minimized. Ideally, different classes within the society are affected differently based on race, gender, as well as education. In fact, the reactions of people caused by the inequality in the society are moderated and controlled by class difference and discernment about the legitimacy of those in power (Lenski, 2013). Thus, it is crucial to indicate that conflict can play a fundamental role in integrating and stabilizing the society. In summary, the main source of problems is the exploitation and oppression of proletariat by dominants.
Justification of the Theorist
From the description and analysis of the Marxist social theory, it would be irrefutable to indicate that the Marx's, as a social theorist, critically explains a wide range of social phenomenon, which encapsulates revolutions and wars as well as wealth. The description of the theorist is an epitome of the development of the modern society. The fact that the theory revolves around concepts of social inequality in regard to the division of resources is a clear indication that supports the applicability of the theory. For instance, the development in the last few decades such as democracy and civil rights are examples elucidating and supporting the theory. In this regard, it would be undisputable to indicate Marx, as a theorist provided explanation for developments being experienced in the contemporary society.
References
Crossman, A. (2018, June 1). Understanding Conflict Theory. Retrieved from Conflict theory: https://www.thoughtco.com/conflict-theory-3026622
Lenski, G. E. (2013). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. UNC Press Books.
Sidanius, J., " Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
