Paying both new and existing employees should be based on the company's financial health. Utilizing workers' situations for personal gain is unethical. In a same vein, it is immoral to reduce employee pay. Therefore, the company should raise the pay for new hires to about $18 while keeping the pay for existing employees the same. The corporation should benefit from the wage adjustment as much as the workers. Additionally, the mentioned pay modifications are prompted by the current economic downturn; if the economy were to go up, the corporation would need the employees to continue performance. Therefore, the board of the corporation should refrain from taking actions that stir up controversy.
Situation 8: The company should retain its programs. Sue’s case is individual, and therefore other aspects should be scrutinized before making decisions. According to the Utilitarian model, a decision should offer the utmost benefit to the largest number of people. For this reason, other employees may be in need of receiving education assistance from company A. The current scenario may only benefit Sue and on the other hand create more responsibilities to the business. It is also not plausible for the corporation to satisfy every employee’s individual needs.
Scenario 9
It is morally wrong to pressure an employee to make a monetary contribution. It is also unlawful to force employees to give out their earnings for the corporation’s gain. Creating a favorable image to the community by pressuring employees is an act of deception. The firm should budget the donations from its financial account. This maneuver can enhance the employees’ performance as a way of contributing to the company and the society. This is also an ethical approach to improving the corporate’s image. Therefore, the society can term the company as moral and sustainable.
Type your email