According to the reasoning, the issue "reality" is an intriguing one. It shapes positive thinking from society's ignorance or negative thinking. Personally, it was evident from the assumption that everything is a reality, whether as an idea, notion, or action. But, based on the review and inspection, it is now clear that in order for something to be a reality, it must have some amount of existence and the possibility of occurring (Boom, 23).
Actualization is required to make meaning of reality. As a result, any activity should be the product of actualization. The argument is extracted with the view of a German philosopher Herbert Marcuse. The purpose of this reading "Negative thinking" is preferred in-class curriculum to give an exposure and then overcome by the use of revolutionary action to all the contradictions constituting the advanced industrial societies (Marcuse, 125). The problem of non-actualization of concealment occurs in the societies or among people because not only do different communities create contradiction and other forms of dominations that are associated with them, but also provided the psychological and social mechanisms that hide the contradictions. The students need to learn about all these facts of actualization as they occur in the frequent occasion in their societies and should be avoided. For example, a social contradiction can occur in a situation where the growth of national wealth and poverty co-exists in the same place at the same time (Marcuse, 126). In that those who0 win, take control and influence on all the means of production. The same time, the minority grow poorer. Basically, the idea being presented are those of the book's title "Revolution and Reality." Reason gives a distinction between what exist. Therefore, it brings the idea that, if social conditions prevent realization, then reason calls for revolution.
Part 3: Logical Presentation of Argument Examined
Actualization is necessary for making sense of reality. Actualization means to make something possible of happening or be achieved during an action (Rauhut, 17). Therefore, for the necessity of reality, any event should be turned into action or fact. On the same cause, reality means the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to a notional idea about the particular situation. It, therefore, stands that, for any activity to be considered a reality, it should have the possibility of substantial existence or be achieved by people.
[A]2. Based on this idea, it is right to come to a conclusion that actualization should be necessary for making sense of reality.
4. In line with the stated conclusion, the subject of the argument is the reality.
The predicate of the argument is that "should be necessary for making sense of reality."
[B] According to Modus Ponens, an argument is a sequence of the statements whereby all the statements in a sentence are premises except the last one (Rauhut, 18). The last one is always the conclusion.
5. Like in the case above, it can be said p q
Actualization is necessary for making sense of reality
Act should be thought of actualization
6. The first premise will be 1 if actualization promotes reality, then actualization should be a necessity in creating sense of reality
7. The second premise 2. Actualization should be a necessity in creating a sense of reality.
8. P= Actualization is necessary for making sense of reality
Q= Act should be thought of actualization
Justification
[C] 9. First premise: If an act can be made to be a reality through actualization, then actualization creates a sense of reality.
10. Second premise: Actions can be made into reality through actualization.
Part 4: Logical Presentation of the Challenge to the Examined Argument
[A] 11. From the Argument, premise 1 of question 6 is going to be challenged," if actualization promotes reality, then actualization should be a necessity in creating the sense of reality."
12. Using this argument, it is challenged by an approval statement. The conclusion for to challenge the argument should be;
It is not true that actualization should be necessary for making sense of reality.
[B] According to Modus Tollens, an argument that denies, the above conclusion will be represented as
13. ¬qp→q
Basing the presentation on the above conclusion
14. The first premise; if actualization should dictate sense reality, then ideas and notion do not make sense.
15. The second premise; only actions makes sense of reality
In the representation of symbols
16. P= Actualization is necessary for making sense in reality.
Q= only actions makes sense of reality
Justification
[C]17. If anything has no proof of action, then it cannot be a reality.
18. Only actions make sense of reality
Part 5: Evaluation
[A] 19. According to the above argument, it is right to come up to a conclusion that “Actualization should be a necessity in making sense of reality.”
Using the first example in the Logical challenge of the first conclusion, "Actualization should be necessary for making sense of reality" should be accepted.
[B] Breaking the above statement into premise;
20. The first premise; If an action is a proof of existence or substance, then it should be considered a reality.
21. The second premise; Actions are as a result of reason and therefore are a sense of reality.
22. Defending the above statement, it is true that everything that has the ability of happening or some possibility of achieving it is a reality (Jacovides, 32). When an act is said to be real, then it means that it has some level of existence. All actions have got substance or some level of quality, needed to prove reality. When actualization is made a necessity in making sense of reality, then it makes it easy to come up with proofs of something (Jacovides, 32). Bringing in to book ideas or certain notions is not enough to prove the something is actually. It is significant to consider actuality of every situation to justify its reality.
References
Marcuse, Herbert. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge, 2013.
file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Plato_Republic_-_Book_1.pdf
Bloom, Allan, and Adam Kirsch. The Republic of Plato. Basic Books, 2016. file:///C:/Users/user/Documents/EGDownloads/Maritain_Essence_Substance_Act.pdf
Rauhut, Nils Ch, and Robert Bass. "Readings on the Ultimate Questions." (2010).
file:///C:/Users/user/Documents/EGDownloads/Logic_Knowledge_Religion_Rauhut.pdf
Jacovides, Michael. "Locke's Metaphysics." (2015): 153-155.
file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Lock_on_Qualities%20(1).pdf
