In the paper, the student addresses appropriately some of the issues that concern the judicial process unlike the common criminal cases, the scenario in this movie revolves around the protection of the environment. As such, the decision of the student to look at the case from the perspective of the environment demonstrates the relationship between the law and the society. In this case, the court is acting for the public good. The role of the court in this situation is to safeguard the environment. Evidently, the student demonstrates the connection between the law and the society. Another aspect of this post is that the writer looks at some of the processes that were used in the determination of the case.
The student notes that the judge in the movie instructed the jurors to take notes during the hearing process. Considerably, I find this observation by the writer to relevant when looking at issues regarding sentencing. In a court, judicial officers tend to make mistakes because of inadequate information about a case. The decision by this post to highlight the significance of the note-taking process demonstrates the significance of having vital information about a case in court.
Also, the author of the post notes the issue of application of the law. Mostly, arguments arise on whether judges should in some cases use personal wisdom rather the law as written. Considerably, the post also focuses on this issue. Such information is insightful since it informs readers on some of the unique ways that judges use in making their judgments. Evidently, there are those cases that will require a judge to look at issues such past court decisions or the defense's arguments rather than looking at the written law.
