The Effects of Living in a Disadvantaged Neighborhood on Youth
The youth growing up in a poor neighborhood often have a significantly reduced chance of proper development in life. The essence of this is associated with hardships experienced due to the negative impacts such as increased rate of crime, and poor living conditions. The evidence which supports this aspect indicates that the comparison to growing up in affluent neighborhoods, the youths in these ghetto often have high levels of unemployment rates and poverty which limits many chances to succeed in life (Schaefer, 2012). Further, their life often begins affected by reduced opportunities to graduate from high school in most regions.
The Effects of Disadvantaged Neighborhoods on Cognitive Development in Childhood
The research question entails the effects of living in ghetto or disadvantaged regions on youth population. Additionally, the importance of this study assists in demonstrating the significance of neighborhoods to the childhood which resonates with impacts on cognitive development in a later generation. The ghetto is also referred to as disadvantaged neighborhoods which are characterized by a high level of poverty, welfare receipt, unemployment few educated adults and female-headed households (Shroder " Orr, 2012). Besides, there is a correlation between the poor neighborhood and is associated with impaired cognitive skills among the youths which have reduced chances to advanced beyond their parent’s capabilities. Therefore the outcome of such condition reflects on that bad environment often worsen the life chances of the youth in their future.
Literature Review
The are various research conducted about the effects on ghetto on youth pointing multiple aspects in the topic. The evidence regarding the impact of neighborhood environment on youth has been categorized as the central way to design a broader range of public policies. The essence of this is addressed through the long-term survey data from the moving to opportunity. The primary objective is to demonstrate the evaluation of opportunity to understand whether neighborhood poverty with their related characteristics has an independent causal effect on the life chances of the youth within these societies (Gennetian, Sanbonmatsu, Katz, Kling, Sciandra, Ludwig, " Kessler, 2012). Further, it worth noticing that there is an empirical correlation in regards to the impact of neighborhood environments given the outcomes ranging from the characteristics of the youth and their families. The essence of this factor is attributed with the list choice and means of survival due to the hardships experienced among these people in the society.
The Impact of Growing Up in High Crime Neighborhoods on Youth Criminal Behavior
There is also research describing whether growing up in high crime neighborhood have an impact on youth criminal behavior. Moreover, the investigation in this study explores more on neighborhood crime as a subsequent criminal behavior of youth where they exploit a unique environment. There is also evidence linking the possibility of this association whereby convicted youth for crime are exposed to neighborhoods with a high rate of criminal activities(Damm, " Dustmann, 2014). The question of whether a lifelong disadvantage neighborhood has a relation to the impact on youth is the concern for public policy debate for many research conducted. However, there is a given the fact that crime is often reflected to be an outcome of particular interest. The existing studies of neighborhood characteristics on the behavior of delinquent youth often illustrate overall mixed findings.
Comparing and Contrasting Article Reviews
In the article, The Long-Term Effects of Moving to Opportunity on Youth Outcomes describes the evidence regarding the effects of neighborhood environment of children and youths as a central way to design public policies. The essence of this article is to indicate the life chances among the youth which varies with the neighborhoods. The youth growing up in regions which have a concentration of poverty often tends to have elevated rates in the adverse outcomes. These outcomes entail lower tests scores, school dropouts, and involvement of criminal activities (Gennetian, Sanbonmatsu, Katz, Kling, Sciandra, Ludwig, " Kessler, 2012). Further, the article indicates that the government of U.S has developed a program referred to as moving to the opportunity to overcome the challenge of bias selection associated with the ghettos. The importance of such project was programmed to reduce the level of poverty to ensure an increased lifelong chance among the youth in their future.
The article Does Growing Up in a High Crime Neighborhood Affect Youth Criminal Behavior, describes the effects of early exposure to the neighborhood crimes as being a subsequential behavior of the youth. The overall neighborhood characteristics expose various elements which have an impact on the lifelong development of the youth (Damm, " Dustmann, 2014). Further, there is a response to youth criminal behavior given the establishment of an association or in the presence of illegal activities. The differentiation between the shared neighborhood effects and criminal context is determined by the local economic conditions of the region.
The similarity on these articles indicates that one of the significant impacts of the ghetto on youth is the assimilation of criminal activity. The involvement of the youth in these activities is based on both the hardships of economic and social conditions such as poverty, high rate of unemployment and school dropouts. However, the difference is that in the article Does Growing Up in a High Crime Neighborhood Affect Youth Criminal Behavior; the overall findings indicate that the measure of criminal context as an impact of youths in the ghetto has an empirical identification on the behavior of the youth (Damm, " Dustmann, 2014). The essence of this is that the neighborhood characteristics have a systematic effect on criminal convictions that are affected by the hardship experienced during the early age in life. In the article, The Long-Term Effects of Moving to Opportunity on Youth Outcomes, the outcome evaluate the primary disruptive effects associated with moving to opportunity program as a likelihood to benefit the influences of the youths in the ghetto. The importance of this platform is targeting permanent change over a long time as a child begins to grow until their future age of being responsible for their actions (Gennetian, Sanbonmatsu, Katz, Kling, Sciandra, Ludwig, " Kessler, 2012). Besides, the program helps to create the livelihood to eradicate unemployment. Primarily this can also contribute to change the desire for the youth to finish their study as well as also changing their mental and physical behaviors within these regions.
Conclusion
These studies are relevant to the public because they investigate and expose the effects of the disadvantaged neighborhood on youth. Further, the evidence and the causes of these impacts are also addressed to disclose the necessary public policies to change the situations. One of the designed programs identified is moving to the opportunity which assists in creating excellent housing developments in these areas. Moreover, the essence of these initiatives is to eliminate poverty and improve the economic conditions of the people living in the ghetto to positively impact the lives of the youth.
References
Damm, A. P., " Dustmann, C. (2014). Does growing up in a high crime neighborhood affect youth criminal behavior?. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1806-32.
Gennetian, L. A., Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. F., Kling, J. R., Sciandra, M., Ludwig, J., ... " Kessler, R. C. (2012). The long-term effects of Moving to Opportunity on youth outcomes. Cityscape, 137-167.
Schaefer, D. R. (2012). Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects. Social networks, 34(1), 141-149.
Shroder, M. D., " Orr, L. L. (2012). Moving to Opportunity: Why, How, and What Next?. Cityscape, 31-56.
