Sophistry and Nature Philosophy

Sophism refers to a form of rhetorical instruction that was commonly used in Ancient Greece to provide rhetorical education to the aristocracy for a fee. Natural philosophy was a popular philosophical idea prior to the rapid advancement of science, and it sought to discover the facts in the best way possible at the time. Socrates was a famous philosopher who opposed sophism in favor of philosophy.
The precise distinction between sophism and natural philosophy is still a point of contention. Socrates made the first attempts to differentiate between natural philosophy and sophism. In the 4th and 5th centuries BCE, the words philosopher and sophist were used to distinguish between the rivalry schools of thought (Barney 79). The main distinguishing factor that makes sophism different from natural philosophy is the difference in moral character (Gibert 28). The methods used by Socrates were hardly different from those used by the sophists, but the overall purpose of two movements differed greatly. Both Plato and Aristotle emphasized that the style of living of the sophists greatly differed from those of philosophers. Sophists often travelled either together with their students or looking for the new ones. They taught rhetoric that was often combined with other applied sciences, including mathematics and even athletics. Moreover, sophists were known for receiving money for their work. On the other hand, philosophers were the ones who wanted to discover the truth more than anything. Financial benefits and secondary aspects of their activities did not matter to them at all because finding the truth was their only concern. Sophists were largely criticized by the philosophers in 5th century BCE for their mercenary character and overestimation of the figures of speech. Just like the sophists, philosophers often used the figures of speech. However, to them, rhetoric mostly served as a tool to extend their arguments rather than the purpose.

The argument about financial gain has clearly lost its appeal with time because modern-day philosophers are likely to ask money for participation in discussions, and this fact would not make them sophists (Barney 78). However, at times of Plato and Socrates, the argument was essential. Unlike sophists, the philosophers were not expected to ask money for their teachings because it would violate expectation of them dedicating their lives to knowledge. For the ancient natural philosopher, refusing the financial benefits was an evidence of his adherence to the chosen lifestyle. Today, the argument is still significant in the historical context.

Another factor commonly used to distinguish between sophists and natural philosophers is the distinguishing between their arguments. It is believed that the arguments of the natural philosophers are consistent with logical reasoning. On the other hand, the arguments of sophists are said to contain logical fallacies because sophists are mainly concerned with rhetorical styles rather than the principles of formal logic (Gibert 42). The word sophistry of sophism is currently used to indicate intentional logical fallacies, such as in the sentence “Beware of the sophism for they are sophisticated” (Dufour). However, the natural philosophy is not free of the logical fallacies either. Natural philosophers used logical arguments to prove their misconceptions about the universe at the time when the beliefs about Earth and Universe were not consistent with the actual way the Universe is built. Hence, both sophists and natural philosophers can be accused of logical fallacies.

To conclude, despite the differences, both sophism and natural philosophy made the contribution into the contemporary culture and philosophy. The works of natural philosophy became the basis of the human civilization. Sophists contributed to the development of scepticism, relativism, and linguistic interpretation.

Works Cited

Barney, Rachel. “The Sophistic Movement”. A Companion To Ancient Philosophy, edited by

Mary Louis Gille and Pierrre Pellegrin, 1st ed., Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2006, pp. 77-

97.

Dufour, Michel. “On the difference between fallacy and sophism.” OSSA Conference Archive,

80, 2016,

http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2248&context=ossaarchive.

Accessed 26 Mar. 2017.

Gibert, John. “The Sophists”. The Blackwell Guide To Philosophy, edited by Christopher

Shields, 1st ed., Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2003, pp. 27-50.

Deadline is approaching?

Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Receive Paper In 3 Hours
Calculate the Price
275 words
First order 10%
Total Price:
$10.99 $35.97
Calculating ellipsis
Hire an expert
This discount is valid only for orders of new customer and with the total more than 25$
This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.

Find Out the Cost of Your Paper

Get Price