Freud’s psychosexual theory of development.

Deadline is approaching?

Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Receive Paper In 3 Hours

The psychological component of the sexual impulse is known as psychosexual. In this theory, Freud describes that psychosexual development is an integral part of the model of psychoanalytic sensual drive that has an intimate drive that progresses in five phases from the time they are born. According to Freud’s philosophy, the oral, the phallic, the latent, and the genitals are the five phases of psychosexual growth. These phases are distinguished by an erogenous zone, which is the explanation behind the libidinal push. He mentions if a child once experienced sexual thwarting in the past about any of the psychosexual development stages he or she will have an anxiety disorder which would continue even in their adulthood as a fixation which is a functional mental ailment. Moreover, Freud perceived that in the period of the liable stages of the early childhood psychosexual growth, the kid’s conduct orients typically to specific parts of the body, for instance, the mouth when the child is breastfeeding, and the anus in the course of toilet teaching. Freud also contended that a grown-up’s functional mental condition is often entrenched in the childhood sexuality, and even thus put forward that aberrant adult behaviors are indicators of the childhood sexual fantasies and desires. These happen for the reason that, humans are instinctive polymorphously obstinate infants can get sexual pleasure from whichever part of their bodies, and that their inetractions direct the visceral libidinal drives into grown-up heterosexuality. However, the theory has its critics, Freud created and forced memories and fantasies, he tends to demean females, and contemporary culture has questioned the normative presumptions of Freud’s psychosexual development theory.

Erikson’s psychological development theory.

Erikson was a man who is American but German-born developmental psychologist and psychoanalyst recognized for his philosophy on psychosocial growth of humans. He may be well known for devising the phrase identity crisis. Erik Erikson collaborates with Joan Erikson in this psychological development theory. They mention that this approach has several phases divided into eight groups. All these eight phases need to be passed through by a healthy individual from the time they are born up to the time they age.

The various eight phases include autonomy vs. shame categorized to even doubt, trust vs. mistrust, generativist when compared to stagnation, integrity compared to despair, identify when compared to role confusion and intimacy vs. isolation.

In the initial phase, trust vs. mistrust Erikson centers on the infant’s essential being that parents meet and his interaction with other people which leads to trust or distrust to them. According to Erikson trust is defined as critical truthfulness in addition to an important sense of one’s honesty. The infant mostly relies on the mother for sustenance and comfort whereas how the child understands the world depends on the parents and their interaction with their kid (Hunderson and Turner, 2003). If the parent’s depiction the kid to warmth, orderliness and reliable fondness, the child is likely to have a view of the world with trust. Mistrust can give the child the feeling of frustration, suspicion, withdrawal, low self-esteem and even lack of confidence in themselves. In the next stage which is the autonomy vs. shame and doubt where the parents still offer a solid base of safety to the child until when the kid can go out to assert their resolve.Tolerance and reassurance from parents also aid in fostering the child’s independence. In this stage, parents take caution for the reason that children may explore things that are risky for their well-being and safety. In all the other stages focuses much on the child’s adolescences.

The similarities between the two theories.

In both Freud’s and Erikson’s theories they center growth on a form of struggle. For instance, when the dispute gets resolved suitably, emotional grief occurs instantly, which may also lead to psychological ailment. Childhood is grave to character growth, and both models put forward that childhood upset can alter growth of behavior. In both psychosexual models regarding Freud and Erik Erikson two critical psychoanalytic models on human growth that can be used to describe the developmental effects of this setup (Taylor and Francis, 2016). Here, we will study what these two methods have in mutual and how they were at variance. Erikson’s model kept an eye on Freud’s and established in a lot of Freud’s ideas. For this, both approaches have comparisons. Both theorists appreciate the significance of the unconscious on growth. They also both distinct events into periods of an individual’s lifetime and use comparable age divisions for these developmental phases. In Both theories, both are certain that a child advances their trust sense at this phase of growth. Freud had a stage called the oral phase of growth for he thought that oral stimulation was the most important means of growth at this time. Erikson labelled this stage of growth as trust vs. mistrust. Moreover, the other developmental phase occurs at the ages of seven to eleven. Freud refers to this phase of development latency and trusts that this is an in-between phase of growth where the child creates relations with the surroundings.It is referred to as industry vs. inferiority by Erikson. He thinks that children start to show their capacity to flourish.

The difference between the two theories.

Freud’s psychosexual approach is able to stress the importance of various basic needs and other natural forces while the psychosocial model generated by Erikson majorly focuses on the environmental and various social aspects. This brings about the difference in Freud and Erickson’s arguments. Erikson major focus is in adulthood while Freud’s theory majorly focuses on the childhood phase. However, there is conflict in terms of the natural surroundings of Freud and Erickson. The theory on Freud conflict majorly revolves around sex while that of Erikson focuses on psychosocial approach.

The psychosocial approach majorly strains on the social order of people that wish to be a part of a certain cluster. Erikson’s theory focuses on the love and care for others thus enhancing the love and care provided for others. Adequate satisfaction in early stages of growth of a person is mainly explained in Freud’s theory.

Freud centered his model on sex, while Erikson did not put forward a lot of importance to the original ambition of a person.Erikson however concentrated on individuality. Freud thought that a person’s position advanced in their teenage years. Erikson concluded, however, that a person’s status grew and evolved all through an individual’s life. Freud mainly focuses on the significance that maturity has while Erikson focuses on the cultural burdens of a kid.

Freud’s theory of development also focuses on the libido’s vitality surrounding the genitals and they he is able to identify with their same-sex parent. To Erikson, though, it is an era of Initiative vs. Guilt where a child starts to take more control over their environs.


Henderson, C. A., & Turner, A. O. (2003). Letters from the Dust Bowl. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Schlein, S. (2016). Clinical Erik Erikson. Taylor and Francis.

This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.

Let a professional writer get your back and save some time!

Hire Writer

Find Out the Cost of Your Paper

Get Price