Art History: the neoclassic and romantic eras

Line is an instrumental element of art. During the 18th and the 19th century, different era of art came forward and was differentiated on the methods to use. In the above stated century, Neoclassical and Romanticism controlled the field of art. As such the need to compare and contrast their differences. Their approach was informed by social reforms, the change is necessary. Line plays a significant role in the interpretation of any piece of artwork. Sharp and geometric line with limited brush is recommended by Neo classical artists. In simpler terms, the neoclassical opinion is created on the conservative side that the line should be a bit sharp, definite and within the tenets of athletics.
Neoclassical artists use painting as secondary to the actual work. In essence, neoclassical artists utilize line to influence perception, direction, and content. Jacqeus-Loiuse David advances classical art through the drawing of “Death of Socrates” while Eugene Delacroix portrays Romanticism through his drawing, Death of Sardanapalus. Classical artists used more horizontal and vertical lines to emphasize stability. Besides, gender presentation was distinctively clear in terms of thickness, tone, and appeal. A view of the work of Jacques shows an exceptional emphasis on lines with limited growing. For instance, the painting of Socrates is dominated by sharp .The underlying concept of classical use of line is emphatic on the curves, other body parts to create a better visual impression. Most of the application of line based on gender is oriented on their appeal, affected by shape, texture, and form. Neoclassical having emphasis on drawing less stressful lines with relatively lower brushstroke represent an era of conservatism.
Romanticism tends to be keen on line sensitivity as well. The death of Sardanput is drawn in a way that lines take random shape but close relate to the object in question. The use of lines is a recipe to the anesthetic of a particular market powered. Taking a creative, critical, and innovate aspects of Romanticism. In essence, Romanticism targeted such emotional appeals as love and therefore used lines to set painting boundary only.
Neoclassical use lines in a rather finite manner to retain pro-geometric identity of 18th century. As such, neoclassical art just uses line because it has been considered the epitome of straight line grids. In most cases, the two eras are so close but slightly divergent in terms of their theme as implied by the color.
Romanticism enjoys a blend of colors that accurately remain within the boundaries of the object lines. Romanticism depicts thin lines that portray attempt of passion, precision, and aesthetics. Besides, the lines from Romanticism manifest acts of romance. Most importantly, female nudity is depicted with which lines in some parts but more paint in the background to realize balance, visibility, color tone, and gender.
Either era attach significance to line in terms of the interpretation of their work. It is evident that Neoclassical and Romanticism point towards the unavoidable use of line to give shape to objects and provide boundary on the object for as long as paint will also be included. In conclusion, Neoclassical emphasize use of straight lines while Romanticism is flexible and constitute technical blend of other elements to enhance the appearance and interpretation of the object.