In the documentary the Freedom Riders
The public space is a potent expression tool. It was utilized as a shape of resistance which claimed the directness, accessibility, and equity in shared areas.
Zachary Neal. Seeking Common Ground offers three views on shared spaces.
In this paper, we are going to apply these concepts to the Freedom Riders documentary.
Legal-Economic Perspective
This factor of view presents common areas, and social facilities to inform of public properties. In its complete elementary outline, shared house is a public goods category or assets which is legitimized, entities can consume without restrictions, and any other party can not curb the individual's utilization. During the times of the Freedom Riders, the public transportation was their dominant platform to convey their message to the southern American region who highly subjugated the blacks. Some open spaces had the restriction which was discriminatory.
The Socio-Spatial Perspective
In recognition of public spaces, the social functions are essential as it centers on the maximization of the usefulness of those places within a precise model and organization. In the social space invasion during the revolutionary times of the Freedom Riders, there were several demarcations designated for specific people. Many violent clashes were as a result intrusion of then public ‘spaces,’ for instance first ever attack in southern Carolina against three freedom rider were brutally assaulted in the attempt to move into a whites-only waiting space Weatherford, (112).
Political
The public domain presents people opportunities to take part in political affairs through forums, dialogue, opinion formation and fostering coherence. In this perspective, it stacks individuals’ fundamental right to exploit not only physical public areas but likewise to free shared space of civic involvement that such places made practicable Weatherford, (112). The harsh treatments of the Freedom Riders were to some extent political as some politician as Alabama Governor John Patterson was not in favor of this movement.
In conclusion, each perspective studied
That is political, socio-spatial and legal-economic has distinguished complexities and great literature on which to derive. Even though the attitudes often have correspondence application, they also underline several historical and nonfigurative confines that are distinctive
Work cited.
Weatherford, Carole Boston. Voice of Freedom: Fannie Lou Hamer, Spirit of the Civil Rights Movement. Candlewick Press, 2015.
