Evil has been posed too many mysterious thoughts by many philosophers, and this has not gone well to have a precise definition, but somewhat better examples are typically used to define it. That entire human associate with can lead either to evil or good. Regardless of what the benefit of the factor is, it has lines of crime. Sex is meant for reproduction according to God, with man rape is forced sex and thus not moral as per God's plan. The perfection of the work of the work of God cannot be appreciated by men if there is no gap of the doubt. Thus evil is part and parcel of the human race, and it is there to understand the good of God's creation.
The real origin of evil
Evil has been distinguished more vastly by many on what it is and its source. Alvin Plantinga who is a Christian philosopher distinguishes crime in two ways that's a defence and a theodicy. Defence according to seeks to demonstrate the existence of God which redefines the reality of evil. This keeps the acknowledgements of the theists that there is the existence of evil, but God exists. Theodicy tries to justify the ways of God to man. Plantinga never takes it as a necessary path as none knows God's plans. The only vast difference between the two is that defence needs a little whereas theodicy requires more.
Evil involves typically things that include pain in life. Pain introduces us usually to dangers that we are likely to face on making choices. God created everything on earth when one is suffering from a disease such as Epidermolysis bulosa
was also part of what was produced. The pain that is associated with that skin disease may be out of evil and for one to lie down or do anything that will feel that pain thus clear that evil has long tracked origin. Pain though can be well realized, and then the primary source is not static from the creation. For instance, God created human beings without illnesses such as cancer but as evolution has taken its course, the condition has come into existence, and a lot of pain accompanies it. If a hiker never went for a hiking enjoyment exploration, could not have injured own leg; but once he decided to go for the hike finally was in much pain out of the decision made by oneself.
Evil comes for the society to learn about the good of the creation. Some conditions rise after we have made a mistake and it happens to give the people a lesson that it’s not good to do some things. At the end of that pain, people note that it’s okay to follow the right channel to access something. Both good and evil exist together and if their no evil it’s hard to appreciate the goodness of something. Being born without limps either front of hind makes those who have them to understand what God has provided to them. This comes not as punishment to those who don’t have but rather as a lesson for them to appreciate the good.
With this way that things happen, it takes the roots of evil back to the creation process where the first beings that Adam and Eve committed sin and fro that pain came out as a punishment. But this could make an unfair judgment on the cause of evil. If they are the ones who led to the torture thus, it would have ended after they died but it is still in existence till now. This doctrine that the first parents are the source of sin came out of the Christian faith trying to deal with the problem and thus relating the facts that a baby born out of a man is a sinner too no matter the fact that they have not committed any.
Man is blown to choices, and the decisions that they make are the cause of the pain. One is free to decide on either to eat or not, and if one eats and develops complications, it's all out of free will. The choices that people make should be out of their options, and the consequences should be treated as own caused and not directed to do it. Unlike animals which lack morals and can do anything that they can't define, human should be responsible for what they are doing. In general, God created the world and all that was there was good; the only problem arose from the contributions of humans which out of free will and thus it led to what we call sin now.
There is existence to two kinds of evils that are natural and moral evils. Natural such as disease, earthquakes and floods are those that are not caused by human whereas, on the other hand, noble such as rape, war and others are intrinsic evils which come out of man responsibility. Perfection is not to any of individuals. If trees bore fruits from without ceasing it would be of no importance since none would appreciate it. If the world were to be created without some factors of intervals such as day and night, none would have enjoyed the excellent work of God. If all were that perfect, there would be no chance for moral development. With such a situation man would have lacked a point to thank God. One would have lacked a position to be generous to others, would have required kindness and perseverance and any creativity. With world round and have many chances to associate with all limits and freedom to do what one thinks is possible leads to the rise of sin or evil which is the source of evil
Money plays very crucial roles in the human race, but it is associated with sorts of problems. Money may lead to the change of the morals of some people in the society. It leads to the rise of some kinds of evils, and thus harm comes from our own hands (Thera, 1978). Money can lead to some morals such as murder, and rape. Lack of funds can also lead to the erosion of some morals such as stealing and even appreciating those who have. Thus evils are own created, and others such as earthquakes may also be caused by men if they do some things that may affect the natural design of the world.
Conclusion
Evils arise during the journey of life, and this changes from time to time. Some catastrophes such as earthquakes and disease also are natural, but man can trigger them. Thus, man is the primary source of the evils.
Reference
Thera, N. The Roots of Good and Evil. Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society 1978, 294-391
