The topic about war being natural has raised a lot of debates universally with some individuals arguing that war is natural and others disputing the fact that war is not natural. The absurdities related to war teach us to comprehend that war is not merely an ordinary measure of human survival but it is disputably one of the most significant aspects of defining who we are as human beings (Fry 480-484). War is believed to be a natural manifestation of the usual human sentiments and relations and it is also characterized as a constitutive measure of how we associate as individuals. Therefore, war is illogically a countenance of our despicable innate nature and the standard of our most hyped and esteemed cultured qualities. Bestowing to humanoid race’s documented account, it appears that war and violence have been pervasive and are natural to human beings. The paper argumentatively explores whether war is natural or not.
It is believed to be ordinary for human beings to gang together for the common good of a peaceful society. This happens when we as human beings encounter with another group of human beings undertaking a corresponding activity as we are doing but in a dissimilar method which makes us feel endangered hence we develop a defense mechanism through war. The ancient wars were meant to guard an individual’s margin and food catchment region. At some point, the ancient man perceived the physical benefits of acquiring more land in a larger population, more resources and enhanced standard of living through dependence which was regarded as insatiability and thus war can be referred as a leeway of insatiability. In the ancient times, individuals fought battles, committed assassinations and propagated brutality and only limited times when peace triumphed. The conflicts were over possessions, spiritual beliefs, and land. Flashing back at history, fury, hostility, and brutality happen to be naturally mortal.
Violence happens to be normal to mankind. Human beings are different whereby most people choose to live in peace while a few choose conflicts (Lopez 1-5). Evolution is also very effective in restricting our natural dispositions and incentive collaboration. All beings have had conditions where something troubled them and the first response conceivable is war. Nevertheless, most of the individuals are likely to cool down and evade violence. Merely a few individuals will result in violence as they are incapable to regulate the condition. War is thought to be an extension of the natural aspiration for supremacy and it offers what collaboration cannot offer. Violence cannot be restrained since there will constantly be individuals who are naturally vicious and directing them becomes a major operation.
Therefore, war is natural and cannot be controlled and it will continually occur because we are humans and were created with it within us. War is virtually inescapable, from the fact that human beings have the capability to contemplate, discover, ascertain and make influences. We have had experiences whereby states constantly rise over others concerning various issues which ultimately leads to immigrations. This is a clear depiction of how war is inevitable and happens to be natural with human beings. Individuals are continuously fighting over resources in different parts of the world. They result in conflicts so as to have control over the resources hence leading to the unrelenting conflicts that have been reported in nations such as Iraq. Violence is alleged to warranty terrain and assets to the most dominant groups of the cultured species. It also functions as a tool for population regulation since it occurs during phases of diminished resources (Hedahl et al. 429-435). It is also alleged that the only two species on the planet that participate in war are ants and human beings. Miserably, rudimentary human nature has not reformed since time immemorial and techniques to halt having wars have not been acknowledged. This shows that war is something that human beings were created with and cannot be avoided.
War is believed to unite people together. It conveys a logic of unity with joint objectives and it motivates distinct residents to act ethically and generously for a greater good. War provides significance and tenacity, surpassing the boredom of daily life. It also facilitates the countenance of advanced human potentials such as bravery and altruism that frequently lie inactive in normal life. War is our nature as human beings because we always appear not to avoid it regardless of how determined we attempt to embrace peace. War will constantly disrupt that peace and initiate conflicts since it is natural. When we were born, we learned to follow instructions since we were afraid of reprimands. After maturing, we act in egotism and get to comprehend that there are engagements that are constructive for our self-defense which happens to be war. Individuals with the powerful munitions habitually make use of them to battle adversaries and latent antagonists. Nonetheless, the firearm develops to be a basis of horror which makes individuals arise to fight the anticipated malicious people (Fry 481-485). Human beings will continuously embrace war so as to defend their principles, sentiments, conviction, finances, influence and other peculiar securities which brands it to be human nature.
On the contrary, various debates have been raised arguing that war is not natural but just a fairytale that human beings have incorporated into their lives. War is believed not to be natural in the logic that, there are no other creatures in the globe that exercise it with a similar magnitude as that of human beings. War is virtually constantly conducted for the drive of amassing assets. Most wars arise when there are political, religious and cultural variances amongst states for the aim of procuring resources. Conversely, this drive has developed to be predominantly irrational with the initiation of numerous modern advances. Resources are continuously accessible and triggering wars does not justify the fact that we should have conflicts so as to attain resources. It is probable to culminate war by communally concluding that it is not valuable any longer and also by guaranteeing that we disassemble and extinguish all tools of war that are present globally. This could also be achieved through eradicating confines, redeploying quantifiable affluence and possessions and approving diverse ethnic individualities. War can also be abolished by organizing recompenses as reimbursement for individuals who have lost their property to war and colonialism and holding war convicts liable for their delinquencies against mortality (Lopez 4-10). However, terminating war which has presented vibrant assistance for all people is practically unavoidable since it is perceived as nature which it is not.
War cannot be categorized as natural since it merely occurs because of lack of approval, similar incentives and a shortage of specific essentials. If we approve further than we differ, inaugurate mutual enthusiasms and certify that our elementary prerequisites are achieved, the yearning for war will end. This is a clear depiction that war is not natural but it is something that we as human beings can control. If we eradicate war in our day-to-day lives, those who commit brutality will be outliers, will be outstripped by those preserving peace and it will be cool to handle them. Therefore, war is not natural but happens because we are sluggish and do not want to control it since we assume it’s natural. War is something that can be abolished through excluding the urges to exploit the world. It will be realized that war is an artifact of evolution and cannot be termed as human nature. All over the years, different groups of people universally have indulged in war since they experience an integral logic of prominence to shield those dear to them (Hedahl et al. 431-436). Therefore, it takes cultures’ ethics, scope, and resources to make the verdict if to partake in war or not.
Conclusion
Therefore, founded on the human knowledge of advancement and innate conduct, war and brutality are natural humanoid deeds even though this fact has been disputed by several theories. Over the past years, war has triggered much devastation and agony upon people and the surroundings and has led to valuable understanding and evolutionary encroachments. With the familiarity of the increase and origins of conflicts, human beings can excellently discover techniques to eradicate war and convert battle and violence into harmony. Nevertheless, peace could be a challenging objective to accomplish but it is feasible within the state of actuality. Therefore, war cannot be termed as natural since it something that humans can control from occurring.
Works Cited
Fry, Douglas P. War, Peace, and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.
Hedahl, Marcus, Scott Clark, and Michael Beggins. "The Changing Nature of the Just War Tradition: How Our Changing Environment Ought to Change the Foundations of Just War Theory." Public Integrity 19.5 (2017): 429-443. Print.
Lopez, Anthony C. "The Evolutionary Psychology of War: Offense and Defense in the Adapted Mind." Evolutionary Psychology 15.4 (2017): 1-23. Print.
