Rhetorical Analysis of the Water Crisis in Cape Town

The main motivation or purpose of writing the final draft is to analyze some of the rhetorical skills that the author of the core source uses to explore the issue of the water crisis in Cape Town. On the other hand, on the audience, my first audience is the instructor and to an extension my peers who would also take an interest in responding to what I have written on the findings of my research analysis. The feedback I get from my peers are critical to the fine tuning of my work. However, the feedback I got from my peers which were both verbal and written helped me improve the content of my analysis by incorporating some of the critical aspects of rhetorical analysis which were previously missing or just overlooked. From an individual perspective, revisions helped improve the quality of the content. Revisions also helped in incorporating important details that were previously missing in the original draft hence it is an essential aspect of writing an analysis. Finally, some of the valuable lessons that I have learned in the process of writing the final draft (rhetorical analysis) is that one needs to do a thorough search of content and information to ensure that the sources are credible and the information valid.