Community corrections act as an alternative approach of effectuating sanctions. Offenders need a supervised sentence away from prison. Supervision usually gets conducted by probation officers. Home confinement against the supervised prisoners may also get considered (Bartlett et al., 2005). Convicts bound to community supervision are usually the first time offenders with mild mistakes. These offenders may pose as non-violent persons; they may not consider the need to unleash any threats to their immediate environment.
Offenders operating away from the prisons have the opportunity of acquiring better services. The supervision program received provides a suitable surrounding compared to what prisons offer (Aday " Krabill, 2005). Sending offenders to jail may result in more harm during their process of acquiring rehabilitation. Meanwhile, offenders may have their prison lifetime limited in case they portray satisfactory behavior.
Supervision and assignment may help determine how an offender responds to correctional services (Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 2005). Conditions of getting released from prison require most offenders to submit to a rigorous supervision approach for a specific duration where they subject to being monitored. Such practices determine whether the offender in question is not harmful to the society upon their release.
The constant appreciation of the number of law offenders who get confined to community supervision typically posts challenges to the society. Meanwhile, the correctional services within the community focus to reveal the significance of their influence. Invaluable tools provided by officers help most offenders to integrate appropriately with the community. The level of supervision extended offenders always depends on the level of assistance which the offenders require (Charlier, 2012).
A convicted offender having the challenge of drug abuse needs an intensive type of supervision. The officer attending to offenders challenged by drug-related with issues should conduct frequent visitations to the offender with the intention of helping such convicts live an upright life. Random drug testing, enforcement of suitable condition to ensure the offender forfeits drug usage, enrolling the offender in a learning institution; or even subjecting the offender to employment would offer the offender significant assistance.
Prisoners may subject to adverse effects from mental illness when subjected incarceration for a significant period. Mental challenges among prisoners may worsen in case prisoners are locked in cells for most of their conviction period. Prisoners usually lose grip with their lives upon their detention; such life events may influence the life encounters by prisoners adversely. The convicted offenders tend to suffer immensely due to the challenges posed by mental illness. Incarnation may also worsen the psychology of most offenders. The affected offenders may then need the influence of attention directed from the community correction officers upon their release.
Offenders need an immediate assessment of the services provided by the correction officers. Correctional officers operating in a given community need to extend immediate assistance to offenders affected by various prison circumstances (Bartlett et al., 2005). The services which always get directed from the correctional services’ officers help offenders assume a well-defined life within the community.
Regardless of the offender’s offense type committed, officers usually help most offenders to integrate appropriately back into their community. The officers in charge of community corrections are always obliged to ensure that they become of assistance to the offenders during the process of conducting the process of rehabilitating the released inmates. It is significant for officers to ensure that the practices associated with recidivism do not occur. Public safety is an essential aspect which officers need to consider while interacting with the offenders.
Officers usually note the fact how danger may not get posted by most offenders. Not all offenders who get released to assume healthy life within the society may focus on the need to disrupt the community by causing havoc (Conly, 1999). Officers serve most offenders by having them participate in various working schedules. Offenders may also pay fines. Besides, multiple forms of punishment subjected to offenders may focus on enforcing service extension to the community. Such an approach shapes the behavior of most offenders.
Community correction helps shape most of the elderly inmates subject to a society’s population. Law protects inmates convicted in prisons. Medical provisions usually cover their health. The compassionate release practiced by most states allows most of the elderly offenders to subject to community supervision under circumstances where such offenders may not acquire specialized treatment from prison hospitals (Aday " Krabill, 2005). The act of shaping and treating of these offenders usually gets conducted within the community under stringent supervision and guidelines enforced by correctional officers.
In conclusion, the various forms of correctional services which usually get directed to most offenders act as a crucial tool that keeps in check the offender’s progress. Officers are obliged to focus on the need for ensuring that offenders that offenders transition into the society’s welfare. Officers may consider exploiting community's resource to enhance the betterment and protection of offenders' conditions. Overall, community corrections play a significant role which shapes the behavior subject to most convicted offenders.
References
Aday, R. H., " Krabill, J. J. (2005). Aging offenders in the criminal justice system. Marq. Elder's Advisor, 7, 237.
Bartlett, C., Dinsmore, J., Gilbert, J. M., Kornblum, A., Latham, J., Oliff, H., ... " Sutton, D. (2005). Substance Abuse Treatment for Adults in the Criminal Justice System. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (2005). Substance abuse treatment for adults in the criminal justice system.
Conly, C. H. (1999). Coordinating community services for mentally ill offenders: Maryland's Community Criminal Justice Treatment Program (p. 19). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
