Essay Sample About Genogram

By nature, human beings derive their life from members of the family that came before them. Any of the characteristics people possess may have been inherited directly or indirectly from the family lineage to which an individual belongs. By definition, a genogram can be defined as a family diagram that can be taught as a family tree elaboration (Ranguka, 2015). They provide a way in which it is possible to model relationships between at least three generations. To come up with the characteristics of people, psychologists typically use genograms. For instance, there are very high chances that if your grandfather was a drunkard, you will also develop a strong desire for alcohol. This paper seeks to delve into my own genogram whereby I will be able to describe some of the ethos of those people who came before me.Genogram TableThe genogram table can be clearly given below:From the table, it is clear that my great grandparents were Teddy James and Lilian Brown Clinton. They begot Kelvin Samson and Johnson Terry. Kelvin Samson married Joyce Peterson and together they sired two children; Peters LeBron and Chris Rooney. Peters Lebron married Emily Tiote and together they got 1child; Ferdinand. Ferdinand married Grace Williams and they gave births to me.From the table above, it is crystal clear that some family members suffered from certain conditions. In this section, we delve into unravelling some of this diseases and or conditions that the family members suffered.Teddy James was a persistent drug abuser whereas Lilian Brown was always suspected to be an alcohol abuser. Moreover, Johnson Terry suffered from gambling addiction. On the other hand, Joyce Peterson suffered from depression. Last but not least, Chris Rooney was infected with Sexually transmitted diseases.In a nutshell:Lilian Brown-Suspected Alcohol AbuseJohnson Terry-Gambling addictionJoyce Peterson- DepressionChris Rooney- STDsPsychosocial Stage for My Present LifeThe importance of Erikson’s psychosocial stage theory cannot be underscored. The theory sheds light on some of the developments which happen to an individual in the process of exploring new ideas and the world at large. As indicated by Erikson's hypothesis of adolescence influence on identity, this stage is "expected to build up a fundamental feeling of trust in your condition and in the individuals who administered to you." At this stage, I was in the hands of my mom and my sitter, who I remained with for a considerable period. This stage I had warm child rearing and minding grown-ups around me reliably, for this situation, had some effect to my mental advancement. Amid this time in my life, my mom and I were moving around from Mexico to Klamath Falls, so I adhered for the most part to my mother, yet remained nearby with other relatives.This specific stage is the identity detectable as a part of my identity right up 'til today, I do have self-question, which could have originated from this stage. Erikson trusts that “Too much confinement or feedback at this stage may have prompted self-doubts. Harsh requests made on you past your capacity, for example, potty preparing, and “could have disheartened your endeavors to drive forward in acing new errands (Waterman, 1982)." There is no unique story that I am aware of that would have been noteworthy to this stage, yet knowing how my mom would be defensive and manage what I could and couldn't play with, may have impacted me.This stage I no doubt did not succeed all around ok to proceed to the following stage. Erikson gives the case of kids dressing themselves and over-controlling grown-ups. Not attempting to put make my mom's child rearing appear the most exceedingly bad, yet at the same time right up 'til the present time she is over-controlling. Yet, since this began in this beginning period, debilitated my opportunity and fearlessness. One case is that for any essential family work, I would never dress myself, I generally needed to wear what my mom dressed me in and she generally did my hair, regardless of the possibility that it was a difficult haircut. Also, since my mother dependably put what others thought to start with, right up 'til the present time, mine and her appearance is entirely managed on our identity going to for that specific day (Waterman, 1982).Contrasted with the past stages, I can vividly connect with this one. I am most similar to a debilitated onlooker, as per Erikson, as opposed to the entertainer (Waterman, 1982). "They encounter disappointment that abandons them with the feeling of mediocrity," which is most basic amid this age, which I essentially recollect. I would endeavor to take part, for example a kick ball game, yet sadly, I generally felt mediocre due to the "skippers" picking me near last, or even last at a few times. Humiliating minutes additionally developed the absence of self-assurance (Waterman, 1982).I trust that I have discovered my ethics and know my identity as a man. In this way, Erikson's sufficient determination portrayal, "Agreeable feeling of self as a man, both novel and socially acknowledged," fits me. The examination from an expert clinician may state in an unexpected way, yet in the event that I were to judge myself now, I trust my pre-adult years have been sound, in a psychoanalytical view. Know who my genuine companions are and comprehend what I don't need in a relationship, appears to me, a sound stride for early adulthood.Sigmund Freud’s Theory of PersonalityAccording to Sigmund, personality development occurs in stages. According to him, childhood is the most imperative stage in our development. He posited that real development occurred at five years. Sigmund’s hypothesis supposes that there are three parts of the brain which determine the identity of an individual namely; sense of self, personal identity, and superego (Feist 1985). Many scholars in psychology have regarded this theory as Freud’s hypothesis simply because it places a lot of emphasis on mental condition of individuals.Effective cooperation between the key parts of the brain advance as a result of around five improvements which occur psychosexually (Feist, 1985). Recent decades however have seen Feist’s suppositions meet criticism from some quarters. This is mainly due to its sole attention on sexuality as the only driver of human personality development (Feist, 1985).Freud's Structure of the Human MindAs indicated by Freud, our identity creates from the communications among what he proposed as the three major structures of the human personality: the id, self-image, and superego. Clashes among these three structures, and our endeavors to discover adjust among what each of them "wants," decides how we carry on and approach the world (Feist, 1985). What adjust we strike in any given circumstance decides how we will resolve the contention between two overall behavioral propensities: our natural forceful and delight looking for drives versus our mingled inside control over those drives (Feist, 1985).Personality versus Part ConfusionAt this stage, I have not yet turned into a youthful grown-up, but rather am close, and the vital elements are darlings, companions, and work associations. These impacts decide hint connections, work and social lives. The negative results are wantonness and restrictiveness (Feist, 1985). Closeness versus SeclusionOnce the last stage is finished, this stage is centered on kids and group. Adding to something demonstrates that amid this age classification, care and generation of kids is sound. Be that as it may, if things turn out badly, rejectivity is inclined to happen.Generativity versus StagnationThe last stage is clearly the late grown-up one. Towards the end, Erickson supposes that we as a whole attempt to clarify our lives, relating it to the world and society. The importance of our lives and reason we served by our life accomplishments. We spread our astuteness to our relatives which by one means or another satisfies the finish of our lives, ideally with little laments (Feist, 1985).How Culture has influenced meThe imperativeness of culture in shaping an individual’s character cannot be downplayed. Technically, most media houses day in day out run programs related to culture. Inexactly characterized, culture alludes to the common esteems, convictions and standards of a particular gathering of individuals. Culture, in this manner, impacts the way we learn, live and carry on. Along these lines, numerous scholars trust that culture is a critical shaper of our identity. One of the general presumptions attesting the impact of culture to identity is that individuals who are brought up in a similar culture share normal identity qualities.On a Personal capacity, culture has had a huge impact in my life. To begin with, I grew up in a large extended family where brotherhood and diversity was always encouraged. As a result, this made me to appreciate people from different cultures as well as people with divergent opinions from mine. This has made me to integrate with new people quite easily and as such as enabled me to get many friends from different backgrounds.ReferencesFeist, J. (1985). Theories of personality. Holt McDougal.Rangka, I. B. (2015). Genogram and Narrative Counseling: An Approach for Helping Student to Find Direction of Career Choice.Waterman, A. S. (1982). Identity development from adolescence to adulthood: An extension of theory and a review of research. Developmental psychology, 18(3), 341.