Agrihood
Agrihood is a blend of neighborhood and agriculture which refers to a planned society that is centered on a free farm. The latter is designed as a supportable food model that offers cuisine for the entire population. Consequently, these evolutions mostly involve urban farming systems, community gardens, and secluded ranch for homeowners to increase their productivity. The Agrihoods are made to integrate cultivation with healthy living traits that boost neighborhood safety, happiness, and proximity to amenities.
The Review of the Commercial Agrifood Complex
The review of the commercial agrifood complex depends on an increasing food motion. Therefore, a higher proportion of the cuisine movement influences economic choices and promotes several methods of ethical eating (Allen, 2014). Moreover, the more significant percentage of nourishment does not undermine the principal function of a marketplace in expounding the nutriment frameworks and market roles in defining inequalities (Allen 2014). Considerably, some areas of the food activity emphasize on private economic efforts that promote local, fresh, and organic food which is processed by small-scale farmers as alternative methods of trading food models and its environmental affliction. Ultimately, these mindsets and practices are what are described as foodie logics by critics because individuals in the food motion mostly fail to identify gourmet planning in exclusionary elements such as race and inequalities.
Competition and Disparities
Competition and disparities are some of the independent factors that hinder the food movement to critically handle the issues of cuisine in the low-income societies and limited access to affordable and healthy food in the deprived communities. Moreover, the latter is defined by an idea of food deserts which is described as restricted access to nutritious and affordable food, especially in areas made up of disadvantaged communities and neighborhoods (Reynolds, 2015). Consequently, social discrimination is prevalent in the above societies due to the racially entire operations that cause a lack of food security. Research indicates that structural aspects of food apartheid are averagely accepted in the marginalized fraternity (Reynolds, 2015). Typically, the likely reaction to societal unfairness exists in the nourishment equity that critiques the commercial agrifood complex’s that compromise the society and environment where the food moves target economic and racial impartiality in the context of the environmental and civil rights justice movements.
Difference Between Conformist Food Motion and Cuisine Justice
While the difference between the conformist food motion and the cuisine justice are discontinuous in practice, it is imperative to describe ideological inequalities. These variations reside in normative perceptions concerning food and envisioned solutions and problem definitions (Bradley & Galt, 2014). Concerning the second distinction, more operations in the nourishment motion work under a system that considers food deserts instead of apartheid nutriment as the main problem. Research indicates that addressing sustenance inequality is not as easy as launching farmer’s markets, opening grocery stores, and making food delicious (Bradley & Galt, 2014). Therefore, the reason mentioned above necessitates the adjustment in eating sequence in low-income societies and merits the analysis as leveled by Bradley & Galt (2014) that they can replicate systems of maltreatment.
Addressing Social Discrimination of Food in Agrihood
In summary, to address the issues of social discrimination of food in Agrihood, there is need for developing a fair cuisine justice which ensures that every individual has an access to affordable, sufficient, culturally- appropriate food, healthy, and most importantly self-determination and respect in all cycle of food production, consumption, and exchange. The efforts of ensuring food equity are confined by delineated devaluation comprising of robust corporate advertising, structural racial, deeply entrenched, and socioeconomic inequality. Finally, while administering nourishment fairness is a difficult task, multiple old and new firms are increasingly trying to promote neutrality in nutriment.
References
Allen, P. (2014). Together at the table: Sustainability and sustenance in the American agrifood system. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Bradley, K & Galt, R. (2014). Practicing food justice at Dig Deep Farms & Produce, East Bay Area, and California: Self-Determination as a guiding value and intersections with Foodie Logics. Local Environ. 19, 172–186.
Reynolds, K. (2015). Disparity despite diversity: Social injustice in New York City’s urban agriculture system. Antipode 2015, 47, 240–259.
