According to ancient Indian ideology
According to ancient Indian ideology, human can be defined as atman (Gombrich, 2006). The atman is an externally prevailing spiritual substance that establishes an abiding person moving one body to the other one at rebirth. However, Buddhism rejected this ideology. Rendering to Buddhism, everything is usually impermanent and this comprises of everything that is linked to being human. These aspects include consciousness, thoughts, feelings, and sensations. This is referred to as the doctrine of Anatta, a “no-soul ‘concept in Buddhism. This paper tries to explain how Buddhist describes human nature. It gives details regarding the formation of the human and how reincarnation occurs (Hamilton, 2013).
Explanation through five forms
Human existence can only be explained through five forms which include, consciousness (Vinnana), mental formations or dispositions (sankhara), Ideations (sanna), Feelings or sensations (vedana), and Physical forms (rupa) (Gombrich, 2006). These khandas are compiled at birth to aid in forming the human being. Conferring to these khandas, an individual is a self that shows moral action through karmic accumulation, but not in the idea that a person has an everlasting or unchanging soul (Keown, 2013).
The concept of dependent origination
Dependent origination is a demonstration of the core idea of Buddhist philosophy. It is demonstrated as a wheel in the Bhavacakra. The wheel is commonly understood as the helm of life and death. In the wheel of life and death of human nature, three signs are shown, a cock, snake, and pig. These three symbols represent the human nature of greed, anger, and delusion (Gyatso, 2015). The next phase of the wheel represents the jurisdictions of existence, realms of living creatures, hells, and heavens. This wheel designates the universe where all living creatures exist, as the world where every person faces samsara (Keown, 2013). It portrays human nature from their rebirth and how human existence arises out of mental states. This shows human cycles. However, it only shows cycles in a lifetime, for instance, the life cycle of addiction, connection, and job.
Human nature of rebirth
Human nature of rebirth occurs after ignorance and is ignited by one element (Keown, 2013). Ignorance leads to volitions that cause consciousness. The aspect of consciousness, on the other hand, leads to a body, both in name and form that results in the six senses. The six senses cause interaction that causes sensations, leading to desire. Desire contracts clinging, that primes to the aspect of becoming a habit (Hamilton, 2013). The aspect of becoming a routine facilitates the birth of an individual that gives rise to old age and eventually death. Birth in this phase is the development of a set of predisposition which structures a person’s volition in the next phase of the cycle. People are born with the volition to behave in certain ways due to the ambiance that they might have taken from their previous lives (Keown, 2013). When individuals reach a certain age they gain consciousness and understand that they have a body and they have been reborn.
The analogy of fire
Buddhism describes the difficulty of applying the analogy of fire. It explains that when one candle is applied to light a different one, the new flame cannot be compared to the old flame, despite the second flame originating from the first. In the same manner, one human life, with its given accumulation of characteristics, leads to the next life, despite no passing of the permanent soul from one body to another (Keown, 2013). The theory of Human Nature states that the second mark of existence explains the idea that there is nothing solid or permanent in regards to reality which applies to the self. The perception of the equality showed human nature agreeing to Buddha and the jurisdiction of current environmental ethics and thoughts are described as worth to ethical contradictions. Nevertheless, Soka philosophy of human nature in a Buddhist society offers the explanation. Bestowing to this ideology, all life aspects share a common equality in regards to dignity, but showing the unique human capacity to evaluate cosmic subjectivity, and thus the right to exist should be prioritized.
Responsibility of human beings
Human beings have the responsibility to show cosmic subjectivity and sympathy for all living organisms while operating as creative beings of the ecosystem and developer of symbiosis (Hamilton, 2013). For instance, one demonstration of this kind of thought is showed by Ikeda as he states the explanations associating with slaughtering of animals for food to withstand our daily lives. He states that human beings must be aware of the capacity and worth of life and should show gratefulness for the lives people take to sustain themselves. As human nature is sustained by much sacrifice, people ought to be able to live in the most valuable manner (Murti, 2013). The cosmic idea of humanism does not blindly dishonor the theories of current civilization like the anthropocentric method. However, it tries to incorporate those methods with traits of compassion and with respect to all things existing in the world (Hamilton, 2013).
Human dignity rationale
Human dignity rationale indicates that all beings contain the nature of Buddha and is quoted often when the Buddhist view of human dignity is being discussed. Conversely, this is not the case when the nature of Buddha is viewed as a substantive object, in such a case, all phenomenal are viewed positively, while the importance of the Law is diminished as a principle of negotiation. Thus the notion of Buddha nature is viewed by some as a non-Buddhist philosophy. Though for the past few years the law was a negotiation value when the aspect of its life-affirming was comprehended as one that gives life (Hamilton, 2013). Therefore, human beings own the type of dignity that separates them from all the other organisms.
Human nature and ethics
Taking the logic of one phase further, the philanthropic trait of human beings, as well as their symbiosis mode, is a description of the life-affirming law, leading to an implication that all life aspects have supreme dignity. With supplementary development, the next scenario to pose would be whether or not human nature has a dignity that distinguishes them from other living creatures. Despite a question regarding degree remaining unanswered, both human beings and other living creatures prompt the life-affirming law, consequently there is no important variation in their dignity (Wallace, 2006). Altogether, unlike other living creatures, that only show the law automatically in form, human beings are gifted with the unique capacity to represent the law in an active way through their own prejudice. It is this rare capacity that operates as a foundation for developing the dignity of human beings. Buddhism describes human body as a vessel of the law an explanation that shows the unique self-esteem of human beings rooted in their capacity to give active countenance to the law (Wallace, 2006).
Ethics of subjectivity
The next aspect of human nature is the ethics of subjectivity under the self-discipline of compassion and active ethical. It is essential to understand whether the basic idea of the human being is fundamentally good or evil. The life-affirming law elaborates the compassionate side that helps in nurturing life and naturally considers the good and the opposite as evil. Altogether, all ideologies are a manifestation of the compassionate law, human beings are deemed as naturally good. The Buddhist standard of dependent origination is an ideology of interconnectivity that navigates all dichotomies. Thus, the law’s description as good shows absolute good, not something that is evil is illustrated as good. On the other hand, if the law of total good only submissively enveloped all life forms, human beings existence would be enclosed in absolute good, and thus there would be no requirement for a human to actively manifest the law (Wallace, 2006). The idea that human beings have the capacity to actively manifest the law shows that human beings exist in a monarchy where there is a good and evil battle hence it is only through taking on this battle that human beings can give active manifestation to the law (Zucher, 2007). Soak Philosophy is rooted on the basis of the ideal of distinctiveness of the law and the life of the cosmos, states that the law has an active dimension that operates continuously in destroying evil and manifesting good (Gombrich, 2006).
References
Gombrich, R. (2006). Theravada Buddhism: A social history from ancient Benares to modern Colombo. Routledge.
Gyatso, J. (2015). Being human in a Buddhist world: an intellectual history of medicine in early modern Tibet. Columbia University Press.
Hamilton-Blyth, S. (2013). Early Buddhism: A new approach: The I of the beholder. Routledge.
Keown, D. (2013). Buddhism and human rights. In Contemporary Buddhist Ethics (pp. 67-89). Routledge.
Loy, D. (1996). Lack and transcendence: The problem of death and life in psychotherapy, existentialism, and Buddhism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Murti, T. R. V. (2013). The central philosophy of Buddhism: a study of the Madhyamika system. Routledge.
Rinpoche, S. (2012). The Tibetan book of living and dying: a spiritual classic from one of the foremost interpreters of Tibetan Buddhism to the West. Random House.
Wallace, B. A., " Shapiro, S. L. (2006). Mental balance and well-being: building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 690.
Williams, P. (2008). Mahayana Buddhism: the doctrinal foundations. Routledge.
Zürcher, E. (2007). The Buddhist conquest of China: The spread and adaptation of Buddhism in early medieval China(Vol. 11). Brill.
