Art criticism refers to the analyzing and evaluating works of art, in art criticism we look at different forms of arts we view them in a business way. We look at what the piece of art represents that is the time the a of done, the movement and the style. We look at each and every feature that makes art -art.
Criticism of art involves four basic steps that are looking at the obvious features. Analyzing the piece of art, deciding on the interpretation and evaluate the importance of the art. A piece of art should Renaissance use the art as a result of the features used by the artist, interpretation of the piece of art should be done by suggesting what the artist is trying to say using the previous stages that have already been done. As the last step judgment should be issued on the value of the piece of work. Art criticism is the discussion and assessment of optic artisans. Art is often times criticized on the basis of beauty. One of the major goals of art criticism is the search for a logical part of praising art work. Art is a vital aspect of human life which can be seen in all fields of human life irrespective of their culture or era. Often time's artists have had difficult relationships with their critics. For art to be bought, artists usually need positive criticism from the critics. Art criticism is not as easy as many people perceive it to be, views of recent arts are dependent on a lot of corrections as time passes. Critics are often blamed for favoring artists. Examples the judgment of critics such as enlighten or understanding. A piece of art can be neutral or intuitive on the basis of individual preference towards artistic taste and form. There are many forms of discussions to criticize and value variety of artwork. This criticism and appreciation can be on individual choices towards taste and form, or it can be on the basis of the features and rules of artist impression and by societal as well as cultural acceptance.
The following four steps are followed by art critics to discuss an art work. The activity of art assessment can be divided into four stages as briefly mentioned in the introduction that is description, analysis, interpretation, and evaluation:
Description- the art critic first describes what he/ she can see. The critic is expected to leave out his own judgments and interpretation of what he thinks it means and his analysis of the art. Instead, the critic focuses on the other features such as the magnitude and plate of the art, the general appearance used on the art, the use of upright and parallel lines on the piece of art, angles. Color and color schemes are also described. Also in this first stage, the critic also looks at the historical context of the piece of work in question.
The second step is the analysis step, the critic analyzes the artwork by deciding what they described features are representing and try to explain why the creator of the work art used the certain shades, aspects, and structures among many others, to carry sentiments, aims and past occurrences. In this stage it is vital to pay attention to the construction of the artwork, paying attention on details, such as its use of illumination, outline, extent, and environment. These characteristics are very important in the criticism of a piece of art since it affects the feelings of the critic, just as the color and the light used.
The third step for critics in art criticism is the breaking down of the art work, after the piece of art has been described and analyzed it must be interpreted. Interpretation is used to explain background and describe why the painter created it and what it implies. While breaking down a work of art it is vital to interpret the entire meaning of the work by the use of proof that is presented in the interior of the work. This involves suggestions of the past background such as what was going on at the time, making it simpler to realize when it was done and what hypothesis, as well as flows, are related to it.
The fourth and final step in the steps of art criticism is evaluation, also known as judgment. An art critic is expected to describe where an artwork belongs among alike pieces of work and decide which ones of its aspects the most vital when are making a decision on its quality. Judgment can be difficult as a result of the critic's biased views often interfere and this should not be the case. A critic has to separate his own bias opinions and let the work speak for itself.
Art movement
Art movements are aggregate titles that are given to fine arts which share the equivalent artistic thoughts, style, specialized methodology or time period. There are no tenets that figure out what establishes art movements. The artists associated with a given movement may pursue strict managing standards, while the individuals who share something in common.
Art movements are simply a historical convenience for putting together artists of a certain period or styles so that they may be understood within a specific context or styles and they might be comprehended inside a specific setting.
The movements are normally named by artist faultfinders or historians and their titles are sarcastic nicknames pulled from an awful review. A portion of the artistic groups are for the most part put together by qualities and comparative interests. Artistic movements are the twentieth century developments on the grounds that there were much greater styles than some in art history. There are few words that can be utilized to critique art by art pundits, there are numerous words that can be utilized to talk on every line on art. There are words to remark on each and every part of art. The line, tone, development, surface, and shape are only a couple of ways by which art can be critiqued. This is an instances of words, for example, the six words of critique line, in art, a line can be portrayed in a few things. The words used to portray the line as art are a regular kind of words, not that fancy:
Flowing – this term can be used to describe the flow of the art piece, the way in which different patterns are aligned in a piece of art.
Delicate- this term can be used to refer to a situation in the painting where the colors and lighting used seems to make the piece of work seem fragile.
Simple- this term is used to describe pieces of art that are very clear and precise, not complicated.
Bold- this term is used to show bold patterns in a piece of work.
Thick- this term is used to explain how the paint makes a piece of art seem either thin or thick.
Thin- used to explain how certain pieces of art appear thin.
There are also four words that critique tone, none of the words are fancy, such as:
Subtle- this means that the tone of the piece of work is neutral, not loud or slow.
Contrasting- this means that a piece of art, is contrasting with the real image.
Muted- this means that the piece of art, is muted it is silent and it is difficult to interpret the mood.
Dramatic- sometimes the mood is dramatic meaning that it represents a lot of detail.
There are five words to critique texture
Rough- rough texture refers to the texture that represents bad experience, the context in which the piece of art is done is rough.
Fine- this means that a piece of art is a little smooth, in that the context in which it was drawn is not of bad experience, it is fine.
Smooth- smooth texture means that the context in which the piece is done is of good memories, it carries joy and happiness.
Coarse- this means that the texture is color like it contains a bit of roughness but not too much.
Uneven- the texture is not really clear, some part of it might have been rough while some other part was fine.
Words that critique Shape-
Art comes in various shapes, there are specific words to critique shape:
Organic
Curvaceous – curvaceous shape means that the piece of art has curves, it does not have a definite the .
Geometric – this shape means that the piece of art has no details on the location, scale, orientation, and reflection. It is bare.
Angular- refers to a piece of art that has one or more sharp angles, forms the shape as distinct from its substance.
Elongated- this refers to a shape that has been increased in length towards a certain direction.
Three words to critique movement
Swirling- means a piece of art has a twisted type of movement.
Flowing- it means that a shape is moving and running smoothly, moving continuously.
Dramatic- meaning in the shape of a piece of art there is a lot of conflicts, tension, and uncertainty.
5 words to clarify the measure
Measure is just like massiveness of a piece of work, these terms used are: enormous, small, intimate, small and colossal.
Three words to analysis the contrast
Out of every two of three words for comparison have already been used to interpret more features of art, they are very descriptive words that can be used to critique art, these words are: dramatic, subtle and strong.
There are six words to critique color,
When it comes to art, color is completely vital. Color allows each art piece to stand out. This aid define the artist piece. A critic artist can define who did the piece by looking at the colors, this is because different artists use specific colors in every piece of work. Words which can be used to critique color are:
Bold, vibrant, subtle, pale, earthy and naturalistic.
There are other general words that are descriptive to critique art such as;
Saturation- this is used to refer to the brightness of color
Geometric- this is a descriptive word that refers to figures such as circles, trios, quadrangles among many others.
Organic- can be used to explain free flowing or round.
Symmetry- To show that it’s of equivalent measure on both sides.
Asymmetrical- used to describe not equal and non-propotional elements.
Flat tones- to describe a piece of art that has no tonal outcome in color.
Undesirable space- this refers to the space all over the actual art form.
Depth- to refer to the impression created by area space.
Broken color- This is used to refer to color that is used in small amounts.
Focal point- used by art critics to refer to the spots that stand out in the piece of artwork.
Distorted- It is a changed shape in a piece of art that does not look proportioned.
Art criticism is more than just pointing out mistakes in a piece of work or commending a piece of work. Art criticism involves the interpretation of a critic, it is done to help comprehend a specific piece of work by utilizing known art theories and it also establishes where a piece of art fits among the varying artistic way and flow throughout the past of art. Art criticism has been a part and parcel of many different cultures, such as evaluating art is a tradition, in the past African cultures used verbal evaluations to recognize a work of arts order, form, beauty and how it ties to spiritual and communal activities. There are different styles that are used in different pieces of artwork. There are seven major art styles, some of them are described as realist while others are not realistic. This styles include :
Realism- this is an artistic style where most people see it as real and genuine art, This is where the painting looks much like the real object, it is less stylized or abstracted. This is the most dominant style of painting since the renaissance. The artists uses viewpoint to make a thought of room and profundity. Setting Composition and lighting with the end goal that the subject seems genuine. One of the principle precedent is Leonardo da Vinci's "Mona Lisa".
Another style is the Painterly, which is showed up as the Industrial Revolution cleared Europe. Specialists did not conceal their specialized work. As its name recommends the accentuation is on the emphasis on the painting. Expressions of the human experience of Henri Matisse are great instances of this style.
Another style is alluded to as Impressionism in this style, artists tried to catch light not through the detail of authenticity but rather with motion and dream. The shading utilized is so intense and can be seen from a far distance. A model is crafted by Claude Monet.
The following style is expressionism and fauvism this sort of styles are comparative, their significant highlights are the utilization of strong, unreasonable hues spoke to life as it appears to the artist. Expressionists tried to demonstrate the frightening and awful highlights in regular day to day existence a precedent is The Scream by Edward Munch. Fauvists needed to indicate life in a glorified and intriguing nature a precedent is Henri Matisse's frolicking dancers.
Deliberation is additionally another style of workmanship, it is tied in with paying point of interest to the embodiment of a subject as the artist translates it, instead of illustration the noticeable subtle elements. The artist may utilize hues, shapes, and examples to demonstrate a bit of art. A model is Pablo Picasso who did this with his renowned wall painting of three performers.
The following style is abstract, Abstract does not seems to appear as though anything reasonable. The purpose of the bit of artist is generally the shading utilized, the surface in the artist and the materials used to make it. A model is shown by Mark Rothko.
The following style of realism is photo realism, it is more genuine than the real world, where no detail is forgotten and every single blemish is critical. A case of such specialists is Chuck Close.
The next style of realism is photorealism, it is more real than reality, where no detail is left out and each and every flaw is significant. An example of such artists is Chuck Close.
Light is important in a piece of art especially paintings because we cannot see anything without light. Light is what brings shape, value, texture, and color to things. How an artist uses light to convey his painting, the amount of light says a lot about which points the artist emphasizes, and also tells the critic what type of an artist the artist is.
There are many types of critics such as professional art critics such as newspaper reporters assigned to arts, an artist writing about other artists another type of professional artist is a scholar writing for professional journals and texts. Journalist critics write for the purpose of the general public and if focuses on the reviews of art exhibitions in galleries and museums. Journalists are a good addition to critics because they make art headlines on the news.
Criticism is edited for an extra specialized art listeners and is written on journals arts, Scholar criticizers can be lecturers and colleges and universities professors, who are knowledgeable about styles, periods, mediums and artists.
Art criticism addresses issues such as an artworks cultural and artistic context, historical circumstances and its use within a given social background, art criticism attempts to analyze and interpret a given work. Art criticism can branch into topics such as feminism, environmentalism, the ender that is the queer theory, structuralism, modernism and post modernism as well as all other current topics and issues of controversies. However, the definition of art criticism varies from one person to another based on an individual’s experience over time. Art theory is also close to art criticism in that it discusses what may be considered as art. In some ways, art can be compared to literature due to its complexity and vastness,
Art criticism is by one way or another attached to the hypothesis, it is interpretive in that it comprehends a specific masterpiece from a hypothetical point of view and to build up its centrality ever of. A considerable measure of societies have solid traditions in art history. Basic methodologies contrast and depend upon the sort of art locked in. It has a basic effect and stylish experience whether of art or nature.
Conclusion
In conclusion, art criticism is an important part of arts because other than criticizing artists, they also play an important role in the purchase and appreciation of pieces of art. As shown in the essay above. That is the description, analysis, evaluation, and judgment. This four stages are very important in assessing and analyzing of pieces of work. Art criticism is also interrelated with theory. Many factors influence the kind of judgment that a critic is going to have by the end of the assessment of a piece of art.
Foster, H. (2015). Bad new days: Art, criticism, emergency. Verso Books.
Porter, J. I. (2016). The origins of aesthetic thought in ancient Greece: matter, sensation, and experience.
Culler, J. (2014). On Deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Routledge.
Teubner, R. (2017). The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. Macat Library.
Clarke, M. (2017). Critical Voices: Women and Art Criticism in Britain 1880-1905. Routledge.
