About Gender Performativity

Gender performativity is a concept that can be discussed from several perspectives. Judith Butler’s theory focuses on the ways in which gender is performed through language and the body. It is not done by a pre-existing individual. In this way, Butler re-appropriates Friedrich Nietzsche’s famous argument from On the Genealogy of Morals (1887) that “there is no “being” behind the doing”.

Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity
Judith Butler’s theory of gender performacity focuses on the performative nature of gender. Gender is not a biologically determined trait; it is instead a social construct that we create through our language. In this way, gender is not a stable, coherent identity. Instead, gender is a series of repeated words and actions that define our bodies. Yet, we rarely perform these actions freely.

Gender is a performance, and performances are often flawed. Because gender isn’t fixed, people are often subjected to psychological violence when they don’t conform to the ‘norm’. Butler points to the case of Mathew Shepard, who was killed for being ‘feminine’.

Butler’s theory of gender performativity makes explicit reference to John Searle’s speech act theory, which explores how people engage in socially prescribed practices. For instance, she argues that when a judge closes a case, he sets in motion a series of events that require the character to conform to a series of societal conventions.

Derrida’s account of performativity
Jacques Derrida’s account of gender performacies is an example of the interdisciplinary work that Derrida has developed. Initially, Derrida focused on the performativity of the individual subject formation. In later works, Derrida broadened the field of performativity to historical dimensions.

Derrida refutes Husserl’s residual anthropology by asserting that power and force are qualitative rather than relational. Rather, force is a relation already present in difference. In this way, Derrida’s account of gender performacies argues that gender performativity is a process of deferring, renouncing, and opening.

Despite the difficulty of defining deconstruction, Derrida demonstrates that it is possible to identify the overlapping processes of the written and spoken word. He describes these processes as arche-writing. Arche-writing aims to separate two modes of writing, one with an ‘originary’ aspect and the other with a ‘differentiating’ aspect.

Searle’s analysis of performatives
Searle’s analysis of gender performacity highlights that gendered actions are not necessarily voluntary. Instead, they are a result of repeated practice. For example, when a judge closes a case, it sets in motion a chain of events, requiring the judge to follow a set of conventions.

Searle’s analysis of gender performacies is controversial, because it assumes that the mind is not a fixed pre-existing thing, but rather an ongoing achievement of an embodied organism. As a result, the mind is mutable, shaped by the larger context.

A common misunderstanding is that gender is simply a social construct. In reality, gendered behaviors are actually performed by bodies, which are shaped by language and actions. Similarly, a woman cannot perform a man’s sexuality without a woman’s consent. This approach ignores the fact that gender is an important part of a person’s identity.

Performativity can only be characterized as happy if certain conditions are fulfilled. Conversely, it can be construed as infelicitous if the conditions are not met. In this way, the performative can only be seen as an assertion if it says something that is true.

Austin’s account of performativity
Performativity is a concept that emphasizes the way identities are passed through discourse. Performative acts are forms of authoritative speech that a person carries out with a certain level of power and control. They also require repetition and consistency. Unlike ordinary speech, performative acts do not occur one-time.

Austin introduced the term in 1962 and it has since been translated into numerous languages by scholars including Derrida, Butler, Callon, Lyotard, and others. This volume is an exegetical work, which is sure to stimulate further discussion. However, it does fall short in following the premise Austin sets forth. It also fails to provide an outline for Derrida’s critique of Austin.

Austin’s account of gender performativity is a classic work of critical feminism, but it has been critiqued in various fields. The author argues that gender performance is an important element in the formation of identities. Austin uses the term performative to refer to the way in which people describe and create reality. Austin’s account is a useful starting point for thinking about gender.

Deadline is approaching?

Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Receive Paper In 3 Hours
Calculate the Price
275 words
First order 10%
Total Price:
$35.97 $35.97
Calculating ellipsis
Hire an expert
This discount is valid only for orders of new customer and with the total more than 25$
This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.

Find Out the Cost of Your Paper

Get Price