The Understanding of the Element of Transition
The understanding of the element of transition is based on the actual transformation from one state to another. When it comes to the theme of good and bad, the prompt "the more things evolve, the more they remain the same" might be valid. The concept of good and bad can be understood differently by different people. The interpretation of the words differs widely depending on how one chooses to view them. In any case, a good understanding of the two words will depend on their isolation, followed by a stronger reliance on the provision of a clarification on a distinct basis. The variation in the aspect of explanation of the themes of good and evil lies in the fact that everyone would perceive an action based on their personal comprehension. For example, a good deed can be viewed by another as being evil and vice versa. The concept of good and evil, in addition to their meanings from the text, are represented and interpreted differently by various individuals.
Response to the Prompt in Regard to Beowulf
Beowulf is seen taking action against the demons and monsters, a move that can be perceived as being good. However, it is critical to comprehend that such a move can be viewed in two perspectives that are good or bad. The good perspective is that one can appreciate the fight against the demons and monsters may bring "good" to people compared to when nothing is done because of the fact that such creatures are definitive of evilness. However, relating the same to the prompt, it is essential to acknowledge that despite the efforts taken by Beowulf to fight against the creatures, nothing substantial is expected to change. For example, no amount of efforts taken by Beowulf can bring meaningful change as nothing changes.Indeed, it is true that the more a particular thing changes, the more it remains the same. The aspect relates to the scenario when Beowulf returns from combat he is offered an opportunity to take the throne considering the tender age of the widow's son and his inexperience for leadership. However, Beowulf turns down the chance citing that he would not want to interfere with the order of succession. Beowulf can be seen as an individual with good character and no matter what is done to change him into being otherwise, the more he remains the same (Kroll 120). Similarly, relating the concept to the theme of good versus evil, one could consider his actions as being noble while a different individual could portray the same as evil since he failed to ascend to the throne.
Response based on Paradise Lost
Indeed, the more one tries to change a thing, the more it remains the same. The aspect can be related to the story in Paradise Lost where Satan describes his conquest at the Garden of Eden. However, it is critical to acknowledge the fact that the quest by Satan to gain a better understanding of issues than God does not change the fact that he remains the same. Satan boasts of his ability to convince Eve to take the forbidden and tries to undermine the authority of God (Hanford 175)."A World who would not purchase with a bruise"However, much as Satan attempts to change the fact that he is inferior to God, nothing out of it is achieved. This truly confirms the fact that no matter how much one tries to change a particular issue, they tend to remain the same. This equally brings out the theme of good versus evil since Satan strives to show his authority by engaging in evil ways. Regardless of the efforts put forth by the devil, it does not change the fact how evil he is. The same sentiments are depicted when analyzing the story of Faustus where he tries to gain more knowledge that would help boost his ego. The nature of Faustus does not change as he remains the same person despite the efforts taken to ensure that he gains more knowledge. Consequently, it would be true to conclude the fact that no matter how much one tries to change a particular issue, no significant reforms are likely to be realized since everything would remain the same.
Response in Relation to Restoration through Transitions to Romanticism
In Restoration through Transitions to Romanticism, fundamental aspects regarding the theme of good versus evil are hugely depicted. The concept of good versus evil is heavily depicted in a situation where Romanticism does not hold significance for what is good or evil, provided that one does what they feel is right (Kirk 183). However, this is subject to debate since a good or evil deed is dependent on an individual. A "good" can be acceptable to an individual, but the same may not be comfortable with. In responding to the prompt, it is crucial to understand that no matter how much change one seeks to achieve, somehow it remains the same. For example, if one was to do an evil deed and try to change the same to be otherwise, it would stick to be the same. However, it is critical to acknowledge the focus of Romanticism is to highlight fundamental aspects of good with the focus on aspects such as loyalty, allegiance, and patriotism. The Restoration Timeline specifically in England was defined by bad deeds. For example, this was a period when the Puritans beheaded Charles the First and sent his son into exile in France."In England, Puritans behead Charles I, send his son to France in exile"In evaluating this situation, it is wrong that such an action took place. In illustrating the theme of good versus evil, one can conclude that such an act is evil since, under ordinary circumstances, it is wrong to undertake such actions. Similarly, in illustrating the concept of "the more things change, the more they stay the same," it is evident that no amount of restoration from the inhuman act can make anything right. The bad deed conducted stays as it is, and no amount of efforts aimed at making any change can be achieved. Such events are definitive of the new era.
Conclusion
Overall, the theme of good versus evil is significantly highlighted in the three texts with relation to the concept of the prompt of "the more things change, the more they stay the same." Indeed, the notion of trying to change a particular issue that is known not to become otherwise can be seen as futile. It is crucial to acknowledge that such changes may not be feasible. This can be attributed to the fact that particular events occur as they are. The issue is depicted in the three texts discussed.
Works Cited
Hanford, James Holly. “The Dramatic Element in” Paradise Lost”.” Studies in Philology 14.2 (1917): 178-195.
Kirk, Terry. “Restoration and Romanticism, 1815–1860.” (2005): 127-183.
Kroll, Norma. “” Beowulf”: The Hero as Keeper of Human Polity.” Modern Philology 84.2 (1986): 117-129.
