the texas transgender bathroom bill

It is clear that the transgender bill has received dissenting opinions in Texas from both the state and local governments. According to the Bill, a transgender person is free to use any toilet, including that of their newly discovered gender. The state government's endorsement for the bill is prudent and safeguards transgender workers from harassment, ensuring they have strong self-esteem. On the other hand, it seems to be discriminating against municipal governments, who might feel overburdened by the administration. The states are in charge of the public bathrooms, but the local governments are in control of the buildings in the environment such as the schools, health sectors, and such. Hence, making decisions of the particular agenda should be involving all the concerned parties. The state view does not consider some aspects such as the sexual assault against the transgender and non-transgender. It is evident that the trans-gender has received sexual, physical and verbal harassment from the cisgender people in the public bathrooms. On the other hand, there are few cases on the transgender attacking the cisgender, but there is general fear in the changing rooms. The argument by the nation is rational but seems controlling as well. The local government feels that their case is ignored and repressed despite being the same people to implement the ruling.

On the other hand, the local government criticizing the bill is evidence-based, and their view should be considered as well. The argument based on the presence of sexual predators taking the same opportunity to attack women and children. I believe the stated reason is wise, but it has a significant impact on the transgender personnel. The affected are likely to suffer emotionally if the local government view is to be implemented. There have been several bills in support of their view currently which seeks to have it implemented though they have collapsed several times. Despite the local government feeling deprived of their rights, they should still consider the reasons behind the states’ viewpoint.

I believe that the local government should be in control on the matter but work in line with the state. Collaborating on the issues that affect both the national and the local government is essential in avoiding possible conflicts. The problem has led to mixed views among the nationals which show that the issue is sensitive and the state leaders should consider all parties view before passing the bill. The Republican and Democrats should not be partisan while discussing such a delicate matter. Since the local government is the one to oversee the implementation of any law. It is improper to impose them a law which they will be forced to implement. Also, making a law that is not in collaboration with the state government will be improper since the issue affects both the Texas residence and those from other states. The local government should consider both reasons while making the final decisions. The two reasons to support and critic the bill are valid and strong matters. They should be weighed before making the final decision. Hence, despite the Senate being the lawmakers, some issues need to be left to the local government who oversee the building surrounding us. Therefore, the local government should be in control of the Texas transgender bathroom bill.

Deadline is approaching?

Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Receive Paper In 3 Hours
Calculate the Price
275 words
First order 15%
Total Price:
$38.07 $38.07
Calculating ellipsis
Hire an expert
This discount is valid only for orders of new customer and with the total more than 25$
This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.

Find Out the Cost of Your Paper

Get Price