The National Policy Process and the 115th Congress
The national policy process is becoming more complicated, and developing a congressional platform has become more difficult than ever. The 115th Congress will undoubtedly be a watershed moment. Furthermore, the Republicans maintained their majority in both the House and the Senate. Furthermore, the previously selected members of Congress are unquestionably deeply interested in campaigning for their concerns (Health Care and Tax Cots) and attaining their political premises, resulting in a potentially drastic judgment on agenda meeting. Taking into account the above information, my observation of the interior and exterior atmosphere of the government via media, political officials and the President’s performances that highlight zeal and devotion to attain his electoral agreements which make the 11the 115th Congress an essential platform to push his programs for legislation.
The Policy Setting Process for IPPDA
Based on the above-mentioned, Kingdon (164), narrates that ccepting your policy IPPDA (The Integrated privileges program for disabled Americans) is recognized to be a massive challenge. While assessing your chances of getting the IPPDA on agenda for the upcoming congress, we must take into account Kingdon’s concepts of problem streams, policy streams, and policy windows (Kingdon 164). The 115th Congress agenda setting process sheds light on numerous distinctive and interesting indexes thatassist us to have a better assessment of our likelihood in listing the IPDDA into the legislative agenda meetings, against our party’s two distinctive major issues (Health Care and Tax Cuts).
Creating Priority for IPPDA
Arguably, I believe that our party’s manifesto will address the Tax Cuts and Health Insurance have better probability than the (The Integrated privileges program for disabled Americans).The kingdom’s multiple streams will be the theoretical section I will look to see how we will frame the IPPDA in an attempt to fit it on the 115th legislative agenda. It would be critical to apply the three streams from the kingdon’s method: policy, political and problem streams so as to make IPPDA the top priority in the legislative agenda meetings at the expense of health and tax cuts.
Using the Political Stream
According to Kingdon (145), looking at the political stream, we can use mood to grab attention towards the IPPDA. We can posts posters using pessimistic and upsetting modes towards the persons with disabilities. Moreover, I will try the above efforts so as to define a more optimistic opinion towards permitting IPPDA to become a top priority in the legislative agenda meeting. Moreover, I would strive to use descriptive statistics to highlight the correlation that exists between stigmatizing the disabled persons to the gross domestic product Kingdon 145). Therefore, I will strive to bring out a negative tone about the importance of delegating funds to carry out programs that assist the disabled Americans. Nevertheless, by defining the association between decreasing the government expenditure on IPDDA, it would assist to form the entire argument of increasing taxes. Evaluating the agencies, groups and legislators, we can suggest that they are all elements in the political stream of the kingdon’s model. Screening the problem stream, we can view that have addressed and indicated why they should be listed as a top priority in the legislative agenda.
Exploring Questions about IPDDA
My proposal to you is at first is to explore a variety of the following predominant questions about the IPDDA program’s development, momentum and likelihood of success. Kingdon (90) asks are the problems that quality IPDDA can highlight acknowledged and viewed as pressurizing. (Kingdon 90) What messages are audiences applying to converse about the topic? Moreover, are the proposal enhancing quality IPDDA assumed? Are they viewed as technically practice, monetarily viable, and inconformity with the mass and policymaker values?
Considering Kingdon's Notions
There are other questions that one needs to ask themselves in regards to Kingdon’s notions of problem streams, policy streams, and policy windows. How are politics sprouting here? Is the backup for quality IPDDA viewed as being national and with vast federal support? Nonetheless, who are acknowledged supporters and antagonists of IPDDA policies? Nevertheless, what is the probability that streams will coalesce to branch out a policy window? Where is quality IPDDA on the overall policy outline? What is the possibility of success and what forces are influencing that possibility?
Implications for Public Policy Process
As explicated above, while there is presently no neat mode to repackage the public policy process to elucidate all of its complexities and nonlinearity, assessments of advocacy and other promotional measures that are ingrained on the theories of the public policy process can assist to lessen the process to assist the assessorscomprehensibly assess supporters'activities and their results within it. While Kingdon's theory offers a solitary mode to execute this, it is just recognized as one of the numerous theories on the public policy process. Kingdon’s theory entails that policymakers have the urge and chance to topicsinfluencing the administration into a public policy. Evidently,counteracting public policy processes will necessitate undertaking a discipline of team work and communication. Teamwork and communication will be instrumental in instilling confidence to assist all parties involved to face challenges in regards to proposing solutions that are helpful to the end user.
Work Cited
Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Update Edition: With an Epilogue on Health Care: Pearson New International. Pearson, 2010.
