Both Simine and Whitchurch’s essays examine the links that occur between human and natural life. Despite the writers’ differing perspectives, each of them arranged their views and used vocabulary effectively; they were inspired to have strong points and critics on their positions. Simone’s essay illustrates her research attempts to learn how other people might be skilled at identifying other people’s personalities (Simine & Carlson, 2016). Whitchurch’s article presents insights from the social perspectives of future couples who have yet to understand each other (Whitchurch, Wilson, & Gilbert, 2016). Both essays settle on self-perception, biases as a result of high intimacy and decision of internal traits based on owns understanding. However, they also differ on whether people distinguish themselves better than how others understand them and the issue of detection of personality.
Both the essay expounds on the significance of self-perception but primarily included in Simine’s piece. Simine outlines that the perception of others towards a person is essential as they accurately display the personality of a person (Simine & Carlson, 2016). People are blinded by lack of information and distortion as a result of false motivation about their perception (Erika & Furr, 2013). Correspondingly, the essay by Whitchurch finds that a woman feels more uncertain about the feelings she has on another person as a result of perception (Whitchurch, Wilson, & Gilbert, 2016). People should limit the openness of their affection to their potential partners; he suggests that this will make them appear choosy and allow the possible partner access little information, therefore, making them keep on thinking about their attractiveness.
Both essays support the saying that too much intimacy will lead to biases, therefore, distorting self-perception. Simine suggests that the day to day behavior of a person increases the chances of others to understand our personality whereby they make good use of these traces to understand the nature of others (Simine & Carlson, 2016). The figure of a person is detected right from their surroundings, the music they listen and the online platforms they visit including their social accounts (Erika, 2013). Also, Whitchurch states a description of two people who have a feeling of love towards each other (Whitchurch, Wilson, & Gilbert, 2016). He suggests that a person A will like person B with the same intensity as they think they have towards them. He continues to say that too much intimacy will develop into biases since the potential partners have intruded so much into the others life. It is essential to be unpredictable as it will allow the other partner to spend crucial time thinking about the feelings the other potential partner might have towards them (Association for Psychological Sciences, 2017).
Both the essays illustrate that individuals have better knowledge about themselves about the judgment of their inherent traits. Simine in his article talks about the measurement of implicit personality that is obtained through observing a person’s association among themselves, habits and behaviors (Simine & Carlson, 2016). The logical idea that arises from this observation is that individuals develop automatic relationships based on the patterns of behavior they portray (Erika, 2013). Therefore, the inherent characteristics the people have to predict their behavior more evenly as compared to their implicit state of personality. Consequently, Whitchurch in his essay explains the need how persons are more conversant with their nature when it comes to finding a potential partner (Whitchurch, Wilson, & Gilbert, 2016). A person generates all the possible traits that the partner would quickly find out when judging (Association for Psychological Sciences, 2017). Therefore, potential lovers become so formal and cut off some of their traits but uphold the best characters. The art of being official challenge openness thus enabling a romantic mood between the partners. The essay written by Whitchurch states the findings that were achieved when forty-seven university undergraduates, for that matter the female, made their decisions depending on the little understanding they had on the men who seemed to like them.
The essays differ when Simine says that we do not distinguish ourselves better than other people understand us. He begins by stating that various reasons support people as own best judges since there are certain privileges such as knowledge about their history, understanding about one’s thoughts and their private activities and emotions (Simine & Carlson, 2016). He continues by asking a rhetorical question asking whether we know about persons who deceive their own lives. In fact, the majority of us knows these kinds of people. Therefore he concludes by raising possibilities that other people might see the delusion nature in us too. However, we can derive that Whitchurch in his essay he understands that other persons might have a contradicting perception than self (Whitchurch, Wilson, & Gilbert, 2016). To explain his statements, he expounded the need for a man to remain unpredictable so as the woman becomes uncertain about her mystery man, therefore, swaying Simine idea that none knows others best than self. A journal written by Stefan Robinson compares ‘bromance’ and romance whereby derives the fact that men feel less judged by their fellow male friends than their women (Robinson, 2017). He continues and says that it is easier for the men to overcome conflicts by expressing their emotions to their ‘bromances’ rather than to their romances.
Simine and Whitchurch essays differ on the issue of proficiency in detecting personality. On the one hand, Simine states that there are significant aspects of figures that are open to others; these elements can also occur in unintentional patterns (Simine & Carlson, 2016). Characteristics can be obtained inaccurate measures from the physical appearance, social media profiles or interactions with others (Erika, 2013). Daily behavior indicates personality, and other people like to utilize such opportunities to infer another person’s personality. On the other hand, Whitchurch essay depicts that there are no chances of people expertise in the detection of character (Whitchurch, Wilson, & Gilbert, 2016). When a prospective partner fails to display feeling toward the other person, there are no relative chances of becoming a character- adept (Association for Psychological Sciences, 2017). The determination in this essay shows that a person should play choosy when interacting with their prospects. When people have their first date, it is significant to keep the other in the dark about the feelings hence increasing the perception they have therefore boosting their interest.
In conclusion, Simine and Whitchurch utilized great skills in organizing their essay and their choice of language. Both authors created their articles by developing fundamental conflict. People are less familiar with themselves despite the understanding of their history or their private life (Erika & Furr, 2013). Whitchurch argues the benefit of becoming unpredictable and choosy to avoid openness to the potential partner thus reducing the possibilities discovering your personality efficiently. Whitchurch concludes claiming people not too transparently display their regards on to people but instead become selective.
Association for Psychological sciences. “‘He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not…’: Women Are More Attracted To Men Whose Feelings Are Unclear.” Association For Psychological Science, 2017, https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/he-loves-me-he-loves-me-not-women-are-more-attracted-to-men-whose-feelings-are-unclear.html.
Carlson, Erika N. “Overcoming the barriers to self-knowledge: Mindfulness as a path to seeing yourself as you really are.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 8.2 (2013): 173-186.
Carlson, Erika N., and R. Michael Furr. “Resolution of meta-accuracy: Should people trust their beliefs about how others see them?.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 4.4 (2013): 419-426.
Robinson, Stefan. “Young Men Are Getting More Out Of ‘Bromances’ Than Romances.” Sciencedaily, 2017, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171012091014.htm.
Vazire, Simine and Erika N. Carlson. “Others Sometimes Know Us Better Than We Know Ourselves.” Becoming an Active Reader: A Complete Resource for Reading and Writing. Ed. Eric enderson. 2nd ed. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford UP Canada, 2016. 329-336. Print.
Whitchurch, Enrin R., Timothy D. Wilson, and Daniel T. Gilbert, “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not….”: Uncertainty Can Increase Romantic Attraction. “Becoming an Active Reader: A Complete Resource for Reading and Writing. Ed. Eric Henderson. 2nd ed. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford UP Canada, 2016. 3337-343. Print.