Military Deception
Military deception is a broad term that encompasses both deception and denial. Denial seeks to conceal the truth, whereas deception focuses on exposing an operation's false qualities. Deceptive measures are typically those intended to mislead the enemy through manipulation, falsification, or distortion of evidence. Their goal is to persuade the opponent to act in ways that are detrimental to their own interests. Deception has become critical in military operations, and thus its success. It frequently refers to the resources and tactics used to refuse or disclose information to the relevant audience. The target is usually the individual or group of persons who deception efforts have been directed at. The person or individuals are often the decision-makers. Deception can be physical, administrative, or technical. On the other hand, denial often involves concealment and security aimed at preventing photographic surveillance, media, electronic monitoring, and foreign agents from disclosing secretive military or diplomatic information. Military deception includes both denial and deception which is defined as the D&D framework.<\/p>
Principles that Determine the Success of Denial and Deception Efforts
Deception and denial emphasize to be effective, the deceiver is expected to know and understand the target's mind. Understanding the target ensures that the deception has been tailored. The six principles needed to successfully conduct deceptive military operations include focus, integration, centralized control, objective, security, and timeliness. Focus indicates the target of the deceitful operation and is the adversary decision-maker who determines the cause of action of the adversary. In this principle, the intelligent system is not the channel for the flow of information. The objective is the intention to make the enemy take a specified action. Centralized control indicates the organization by one element. Security is the operational security. Timeliness refers to allowing enough time to analyze deceitful information. Integration is incorporating deception plans into the general operation.<\/p>
Relationship between the Six Principles of Deception
The six principles of military deception operations include focus, timeliness, security, integration, centralized planning and control, and objective. In focus, the deception targets a decision that the adversary makes so that they take the desired action. In an objective, the deception needs to encourage the target to take specified action and not only to believe in specific things. In centralized planning and control, the operations need to be planned and directed centrally to achieve a unified effort. In security, the friendly forces have to refute knowledge of the intention of a force to deceive and the implementation of the intent to the adversaries. In timeliness, the operation of the deception requires careful timing. In integration, every military needs to be carefully integrated with the operation that they are supporting. The six principles are usually related. For example, the target is usually the decision-maker of the adversary. The target is normally studied through a process of collecting intelligence, analyzing the information, and disseminating it through the system. In other words, the aim of studying the enemy is to understand him and his way of making decisions. The goal is to make the enemy respond in the desired way, thus, the deception is often focused on a specific objective clearly indicating the relationship between focus and objective.<\/p>
The Role of Deception in National Affairs
Deception has become part of the daily lives of people and differentiates individuals are the degree of deception that is incorporated into their lives. It means that the way people look at and interpret deception depends on the moral grounding, experiences, exposure, and their perspective. Deception plays a vital role in national affairs, especially in politics, because of many reasons. In politics, deception can be used as a form of diversionary tactic to gain a favorable public relation image, to protect society, to attain the greater good. Deception in politics, specifically foreign affairs, involves the decision that is done in the spirit and is excusable because they are done as a way of serving the national interest. It means that deceit is highly needed by politicians so that they can achieve their political success considering the fact that people are overwhelmed with expectations and if it is done in good faith then it is believed that there would not be harsh consequences. There are many arguments on the importance of deception in politics and if it can affect the level of trust that people have on people in government institutions. However, realists the application of deception is dependent on how to achieve its goal and if it is in line with protecting the national values and interests. Deception also has the role of helping to get the job done in terms of distracting people from the negative of the everyday decision making and focusing the emotions of the public towards meeting the expected goals through appealing to their personal preferences, sense of nationalism, and party loyalty. Deception is considered to be necessary because the public cannot deal with the truth. The public needs to be told the bare minimum to ensure that there is unity among people.<\/p>
Why Denial and Deception Operations Succeed when Employed Against Modern, Professional Leaders
Despite the amount of information that is available regarding denial and deception, it is still successful when used against professional leaders. The success of the tactic is mainly related to the employment of surprise, denial, and deception tactics. It usually relies on head-on surprise, psychological dislocation, and shock as ways of multiplying force. However, to defeat the adversaries, it is vital to understand the impact and nature of surprise and also their vulnerabilities. To better understand the phenomenon, there is three crucial proposition that includes the fact that surprise is considered to be a means to an end and it is not the end itself. It means that the initiator needs to understand to not fully exploit the benefits that come with the surprise but also realize its limits and decide the end results. Secondly, deception and surprise are the ultimate asymmetric multipliers of force because they capitalize on hubris and take advantage of vulnerabilities. Finally, historically, carefully planned surprise has often succeeded even though there is information that can be worn about the impending event. It reveals the fallacy of the assumption that indicates that if enough intelligence is available, the surprise would be avoided. It still occurs even with the advance warning. A good example is an operation by the US and its allied force in the operation Desert Storm that showed a successful use of deception through a radio signal. In this case, the Iraqis had their full attention on the training by the United States Marine Corps making them believe that the Americans would invade the country through their coastline and had prepared for the eventuality. In addition, the US forces made them believe that they were completely stationary. The deception made the war last for only three days and the withdrawal of the Iraqis from Kuwait.<\/p>
Conclusion
Deception is considered to be the intention to mislead and is related to lying. However, even though this is true, it has become morally acceptable because it ensures that information has been recovered. However, to ensure the success of deceit, it is vital for the six principles to be met, including focus, integration, centralized control, objective, security, and timeliness. The principles are closely related because one affects the other. For example, the target of a deceit is usually the decision-maker of the adversary. The target is normally studied through a process of collecting intelligence, analyzing the information, and disseminating it through the system. In other words, the aim of studying the enemy is to understand him and his way of making decisions. Deceit has a crucial role in national affairs in terms of acting as a diversionary tactic to gain favorable public relation image, to protect society, to attain the greater good. Deception also has the role of helping to get the job done in terms of distracting people from the negative of the everyday decision making and focusing the emotions of the public towards meeting the expected goals through appealing to their personal preferences, sense of nationalism, and party loyalty. Deception is considered to be necessary because the public cannot deal with the truth.<\/p>
Bibliography
Daniel, Donald C., and Katherine L. Herbig. Strategic military deception. New York: Pergamon Press, 1982.
Bennett, Michael, and Edward Waltz. Counterdeception principles and applications for national security. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2007.
Godson, Roy, and James J. Wirtz. Strategic denial and deception: the twenty-first-century challenge. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 2002.
Rothstein, Hy S., and Barton Whaley. The art and science of military deception, 2013.
Harrington, Brooke. Deception: from ancient empires to Internet dating. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2009.
Keegan, John. Intelligence in war: knowledge of the enemy from Napoleon to Al-Qaeda., 2004.
Heuer, Jr, Richards J. Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Ft. Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center, 1999.
Mahle, Melissa Boyle. Denial and deception: an insider’s view of the CIA. New York: Nation Books, 2006.
Latimer, Jon. Deception in war: the art of the bluff, the value of deceit, and the most thrilling episodes of cunning in military history, from the Trojan horse to the Gulf War. 2010.
Smith, Rodney Lee. The 21 principles of a lie: the logic of the illogical. Mustang, Okla: Tate Pub. & Enterprises. 2010
