Researchers and Information Selection
Researchers who are approaching a topic for the first time should be cautious about the details they use. Certain information may be helpful, while others cannot, but the utility of information varies depending on the moment, the emergence of the situation, and the gravity of the event.
The Importance of Research Content
For education, the developments that occur each year, such as the implementation of technology in the field, decide the course of study. This paper discusses the importance, authority, accuracy, and intent of the research content, listing the questions to determine the work's correspondence to the issue of inquiry.
First Book - Goldenberg (2006)
The first book on the list, by Goldenberg in 2006, explains the use of technology in solving problems in mathematics. The book is relevant to the topic by stating changes that technology brings in handling mathematical challenges and sciences. Subjects like physics require advanced learning to solve (Goldenberg, 2006). The current child loves solving most of these in an easier way, maybe because of laziness. Calculators are aiding the solutions, as the book underlines. Spreadsheets in computers make the research easy to understand.
Relevance of Outdated Material
The material, written ten years ago may look outdated but gives the origin of the concept in the last decade. It is wise to have one that handles the latest changes (Goldenberg, 2006). It is better for the authors to revise it. The book is relevant for the research and illuminates on the understanding of the idea in its raw form, with information coming from a team of brilliant authors from different universities. Oxford being one of them gives the belief that the content and credibility is unquestionable. Besides, it seeks to inform teachers of the changes that can ensure the right education (California State University, 2010). This handles the research by explaining the ideas of adequate education from the time of writing.
Second Material - Demeo (2008)
The second material, written two years after the first, explains the manual or old-time way of solving problems. Demeo Stephen produces the work in 2008 to handle the multiple solution methods for teaching science. One way of understanding the changes that technology brings to learning is by knowing deep learning methods. The relevance of this is to establish a ground for technology to facilitate in solving the problem of knowledge grasp, though the researchers must know which problem to solve (Demeo, 2008). In the end, it builds the literature of the large education sector in learning the scientific and technical areas of teaching.
Authority and Credibility
The authority of writing is easy to gauge from the information availed about the author. He is an educator who worked in several reputable colleges like Columbia, Hunter among others. These are credible institutions, commanding authority and respect, making the work believable. No errors can be in their publications, as every person has upright principles of work. The publisher also has a team of verifiers who review the work before it comes out for reading (Demeo, 2008). Its principal purpose is to inform the teacher, students, and works as an example for use in their management system. These facts come with figures and options for teachers, without biases.
Credibility of Selected Items
These items are credible for the coursework and investigation of the problem at hand. They meet all the authority, relevance, accuracy, and purpose. The reason for not choosing current ones is to handle the problems from the original dates (California State University, 2010). Besides, no revisions to update their products were available. In conclusion, they have the best sources of information for the benefit of students and researchers of the topics.
References
California State University. (2010). Evaluating information: Applying the crap test. Retrieved from https://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf
Demeo, S. (2008). Multiple solution methods for teaching science in the classroom: Improving quantitative problem solving using dimensional analysis and proportional reasoning. Sydney, Australia: Universal Publishers.
Goldenberg, K. (2006). Using technology for problem solving in middle and high school mathematics: Investigations using scientific and graphing calculators, spreadsheets, and the geometer’s sketchpad. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson.
