Outlining the authors' key point in the study will help the summary. Although they are described in the article's introductory section, the writers' two objectives are not included in the summary. The authors of the article want to find out how much heterozygosity and inbreeding are similar in house sparrows. The other goal is to determine whether heterozygosity and inbreeding levels have an effect on morphology.
Results
The results of this are only briefly stated in the summary when discussing the impact of F and H on fledgling morphology. However, the authors provide extensive results in the article which need to be included in the summary. The summary needs to document these results in detail so that the readers can get an insight on what to expect in the discussion part of the article.
Conclusion
The summary also leaves out the conclusion made in the article based on the findings and discussion. The conclusion part is included in the last section of the discussion part. The conclusion that the study makes is that inbreeding depression results in decreased recruitment of house sparrows. It is through this conclusion that the authors make recommendations for further research an aspect which is not identified in the summary. The summary can be improved by documenting the areas of future research recommended by the research.
In general, the summary can be improved by including the three aspects identified in this essay. The three sections identified to be lacking in the summary are the objective, part of the results, conclusions as well as future research.
