Changing the Smoking Policy in College

Deadline is approaching?

Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Receive Paper In 3 Hours

Starting September 9, 2009, the Portland Community College was once declared to be a tobacco-free zone following the declaration of the Tobacco-Free Policy – B 709. The announcement led to the clarification of several regulations that each outlined how the process will be implemented to make certain that the school environment is free from tobacco. The main focal point of the analysis of the rules is that the Policy discourages the use of tobacco and its possession within the faculty environs. The understanding of the rules, however, creates one major weakness that deserves to be constant if the implementation is intended to have even better response considering the purpose of making Portland Community College tobacco-free. There ought to be a mechanism out in place to eliminate the existence of Good Neighbor Zones because having such places within the college means that the school is ironically promoting the possession of tobacco around the school while trying to make the institution tobacco-free. In line with the goal of making PCC a tobacco-free zone, absolute measures to ensure there is no possession of tobacco and related products is critical including the elimination of Good Neighbor Zones through the use of collaborative effort.

The suggested technique involves the changing of the school’s program to ensure that the Good Neighbor Zones are eliminated because they tend to promote the use of tobacco around the school environment. One of the rules states that “The inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying of any lighted smoking material, including cigarettes, e-cigarettes, cigars, or pipes, is prohibited on college property excluding Good Neighbor Zones” (Portland Community College). The assessment of this provision highlights a glaring weakness where the school appears to encourage the possession of cigarettes only that it is mentioned that smoking should be done from a restricted point. It thus follows that the institution is trying to be accommodative of smoking when at the same time the goal is to ensure that PCC is a tobacco-free zone. It thus calls for the need for total elimination to ensure that the Good Neighbor Zones are scrapped so that the students do not think of smoking at any time within the school environment. The justification for this idea is that it will drastically reduce the number of new smokers because they will not see any area within the school where there can test their smoking anxieties.

The recommended strategy entails involving parents in the school prevention programs that are targeted at helping the affected populations quit. The role of the families cannot be ignored when a school tries to make the institution a tobacco-free zone because if a student gets support to continue engaging in smoking from the family, then the efforts put in schools could be futile. In a setting where some of the family members openly promote smoking, students will not perceive it as wrong and will try to influence other students to engage. Family meetings should be put in place to ensure that the topic is discussed openly and the adverse effects of tobacco outlined to students to aid the policies put at school be effective.

The involvement of parents should, however, be accompanied by efforts that are intended at ensuring that smokers are assisted to quit. The approach is based on the finding that Good Neighbor Zones are created to accommodate people who are already smokers and who are finding it difficult to stop because they are addicted to it. Community-cessation programs must be implemented if any positive results are anticipated and the programs should be supported by the parents and volunteer organizations. However, opponents to the idea of banning smoking often cite that there are reduced chances of success. For example, a 2015 study by scholars found that out of 55.4 adults who tried to quit the use of tobacco, only 7.4 percent managed to stay quit for six months and more (Bach 1). It illustrates that there are lower chances of success. However, the principle of improving these percentages is that parents will be involved so that there is increased awareness in both the schools and the domestic setting with all members of the community being involved. The opponents to the elimination of total elimination can acknowledge that with such efforts in all dimension put in place, there will be no need for Good Neighbor Zones at PCC.

To become a tobacco-free zone, the suggested mechanism should involve the elimination of smoking in all areas including the Good Neighbor Zones. The use of community-based support and family support is expected to improve the response from the addicts in an effort to help them quit smoking. The intervention is expected to have a positive effect overall because the students will not be thinking about smoking within the institution because all areas will be restricted. Overall, by making use of the support from parents, the society and volunteer organization, the realization of implementing community-based intervention is attainable to ensure that PCC is genuinely a tobacco-free zone.

Works Cited

Bach, Laura. “How Schools Can Help Students Stay Tobacco-Free.” Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (2005): n. pag. Print.

Portland Community College. “Tobacco Free Policy, Rules, & Procedures.” An Affirmative Action Equal Opportunity Institution (2017): n. pag. Web.

This sample could have been used by your fellow student... Get your own unique essay on any topic and submit it by the deadline.

Let a professional writer get your back and save some time!

Hire Writer

Find Out the Cost of Your Paper

Get Price

Can’t find the essay you need? Our professional writers are ready to complete a unique paper for you. Just fill in the form and submit your order.

Proceed to the form No, thank you
Can’t find the essay you need?