The major points from both sources are succinctly summarized in the paper. You were able to describe The Battle of the Yarmuk in great detail, as it is the subject matter in Al-Baladhuri. The explanation provides a clear summary of the historical event so that readers who have read the original source can understand it with ease. The second source also deals with a similar situation, so I commend you for including it in your writing. For instance, you were effective in sequencing the battle's chronology of events, which helps the readers understand the significance of what happened. The paper is in tandem with the classroom coverage of the historical account of these past events. However, the analysis part of the assignment needs to be revised; it does not look into the authors regarding their positions in the society. Also, your work is deficient in the explanation of the purpose of the pieces and in this sense, you have not explained the rationale behind the work. Further, your work does not point out the values that are behind the content written in the source. Beyond the narrative of the unfolding of events, your work fails to analyze the credibility or incredibility of the sources.
The narration of these historical events is exemplary, and I wish to commend you for this particular attribute. It gives the reader a clear image of the historical accounts of these events. However, the analysis part needs to be fixed; your paper fails to look into the sources in a critically and objectively. For this reason; the paper needs significant revision in order to be in strict conformity with the instructions. In totality, the paper is written well, but you have deviated from the instructions, and you need to revise this part.