Regardless of the subject or practice, argumentation may be extended to almost all modes or writings that may include critical thinking. As a result, it is important for all students to grasp the techniques, values, and concepts that motivate the critical reasoning skills associated with argumentative writing. There must be ” a debatable subject” for a genuine case to form (Richard, 2015). This paper would go through some argumentative techniques that can be used in a debate.
An argument is a rational effort to convince the listener to accept a specific point of view on some debatable subject (Richard, 2015). Therefore, an argument is not irrational as it does not depend firmly on passion or emotion. Instead, an argument should represent a “reasoned attempt” or careful thinking. This is because the person supporting his or her argument will require to convince the audience to buy a particular point of view.
The key concept of an argument is “to convenience the audience”. That is, making other people believe your position, accept your logic and evidence. Not only trying to making them accept the evidence, but also emphasize the audience to agree on “a particular point of view” or your perspective on the topic of argument. This will allow the audience to understand your position or proposition. When the audience understands that, they may be intrigued by the evidence presented to them. For example, you might want the audience to accept your point of view on the topic about safe sex, gun control, or prison sentences for criminal offenders despite the age. Such topics are debatable, and one can argue by providing evidence to the audience and particular point of view, in order to convince them to believe your position.
Richard, J. (2015). Writing Today. Pearson Education