a multiple choice question

The author relied on five reliable and high-quality sources. Recent journal articles and web app links are among the tools cited (Berkley College). They provide trustworthy facts from credible sources. It should be noted that the author did not use any recent books in this article.
Based on what the writer has presented by referencing the referenced references, I believe there is proof that the writer has paraphrased material from the identified sources. For instance, the phrase "RadioShack is embarking on a three-year strategic plan that will improve revenues, customer service, and sales,” has been presented as it is in the article "RadioShack Corporation Profile." RadioShack Corporation Profile. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2013. There are other several instances where the writer has indeed paraphrased information from the cited sources; the mission and vision are some of the other information paraphrased concerning Radio Shack. The company’s summary is also a rephrase of information from the first three articles among the five presented by the writer.

Part C: Evidence of use of information in an ethical and legal manner

The writer did not give much concern to this particular aspect. There are several circumstances where the writer has presented his ideas the same way they appear in some of the presented sources (plagiarized). Right from the summary, much that has been articulated by the writer has been copied directly from the articles (plagiarism). Some aspects/ pieces of evidence suggest plagiarism in the sub-topics; situational analysis and business strategy.

Paper 2.

Part A: Evidence of high-quality Resources

In this particular paper, the writer has used fourteen high-quality resources. The resources are inclusive of recent books and journal articles. All these sources contain relevant information about the subject of study and are from reputable sources.

Part B: Evidence of Evaluation of Sources

In this particular paper, the writer appears to have rephrased information from some of the identified sources. He has not extensively evaluated the information in regards to his or her understanding. However, there is minimal evidence that suggests that at least the writer made some efforts to evaluate the information from the articles to their knowledge. For instance, there are shreds of evidence of attempts concerning the writer’s evaluation on Porter's five forces in relation to the apparel industry. Though, in the situational analysis particularly on the overview of the company and the SWOT analysis part, the writer has paraphrased most of the ideas articulated.

Part C: Evidence of use of information in an ethical and legal manner

There are minimal cases of plagiarism in this particular paper. This means that the writer was keen to avoid such unethical measures when it comes to writing. From the paper, the writer has quoted statements that they copied directly from the sources. Quoting the phrases gives the reader an impression that the writer acknowledges whoever wrote those relevant pieces of information.

Paper 3.

Part A: Evidence of high-quality Resources

For this paper, the writer has only identified a link. The link, however, does lead to a reputable source that contains relevant information about the subject of study.

Part B: Evidence of Evaluation of Sources

From what the writer has written, it seems they have made fewer attempts in evaluating the information presented as per link source. Most of the information has been rephrased from the source identified. The writer has not presented his own ideas and understanding on the subject, in this case, Coca-Cola company.

Part C: Evidence of use of information in an ethical and legal manner

The writer has not observed academic writing ethics and legal measures. There are pieces of evidence of plagiarism in this particular paper. In fact, several of them. Some of the content has been copied directly as they appear in the source.